Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:42:55.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dwarf Galaxies in the Core of Coma Cluster

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2019

S. N. Hasan
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Maulana Azad National Urdu University, Gachibowli, Hyderabad 500 032, India email: [email protected]
Priya Shah
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Maulana Azad National Urdu University, Gachibowli, Hyderabad 500 032, India email: [email protected]
P. Nagamani
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, Osmania University, Hyderabad 500 007, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Dwarf galaxies constitute 18% of the galaxies in the core of the Coma Cluster. We present the correlation between structural properties and morphology of galaxies in the central region of Coma Cluster for 221 objects within the apparent magnitude range m < 19.5. The data is taken from the HST/ACS Coma Cluster Treasury Survey. For cluster membership we have used photometric redshifts and spectroscopic redshifts from literature. From the investigation of correlations of effective radius, Sersic index, absolute magnitude and bulge to total light ratio, we find the galaxies are distributed as follows: dwarfs 18%, E/SO 33%, SO 22%, Sb & Sb0 17% and 10% are Spirals+Irregulars+Ring. We found that multiple component fits are best for giants and the single Sersic fit is best for dwarfs & spiral galaxies. We shall try to explain why the single Sersic fit is best for dwarfs and what kind of stellar orbits do they correspond to using the bulge Sersic index of dwarfs.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2019 

References

Ahn, C. P., Alexandroff, R., Allende Prieto, C., et al . 2012, ApJS, 203, 21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buta, R. J. 2013, Secular Evolution of Galaxies, 155Google Scholar
Carter, D., Goudfrooij, P., Mobasher, B., et al . 2008, ApJS, 176, 424 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer et al . 2010, ApJS, 191, 1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasan, P. 2007, ApSS, 312, 12Google Scholar
Kormendy, J. 2015, Lessons from the Local Group: A Conference in honour of David Block and Bruce Elmegreen, ISBN 978-3-319-10613-7, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland Google Scholar
Mahajan, S., Haines, C. P., & Raychaudhury, S. 2011, MNRAS, 412, 1098 Google Scholar
Mobasher, B., Bridges, T. J., Carter, D., et al . 2001, ApJS, 137, 279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, C. Y., Ho, L. C., Impey, C. D., & Rix, H.-W. 2002, AJ, 124, 266 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, C. Y., Ho, L. C., Impey, C. D., & Rix, H.-W. 2010, AJ, 139, 2097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar