Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:55:15.735Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Direct Imaging of Planet Transit Events

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2014

Gerard T. van Belle
Affiliation:
Lowell Observatory, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA email: [email protected]
Kaspar von Braun
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA email: [email protected]
Tabetha Boyajian
Affiliation:
Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA email: [email protected]
Gail Schaefer
Affiliation:
Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Exoplanet transit events are attractive targets for the ultrahigh-resolution capabilities afforded by optical interferometers. The intersection of two developments in astronomy enable direct imaging of exoplanet transits: first, improvements in sensitivity and precision of interferometric instrumentation; and second, identification of ever-brighter host stars. Efforts are underway for the first direct high-precision detection of closure phase signatures with the CHARA Array and Navy Precision Optical Interferometer. When successful, these measurements will enable recovery of the transit position angle on the sky, along with characterization of other system parameters, such as stellar radius, planet radius, and other parameters of the transit event. This technique can directly determine the planet's radius independent of any outside observations, and appears able to improve substantially upon other determinations of that radius; it will be possible to extract wavelength dependence of that radius determination, for connection to characterization of planetary atmospheric composition & structure. Additional directly observed parameters - also not dependent on transit photometry or spectroscopy - include impact parameter, transit ingress time, and transit velocity.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Armstrong, J. T., Mozurkewich, D., Rickard, L. J., et al. 1998, ApJ, 496, 550Google Scholar
Baines, E. K., van Belle, G. T., ten Brummelaar, T. A., McAlister, H. A., Swain, M., Turner, N. H., Sturmann, L., & Sturmann, J. 2007, ApJL, 661, L195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakos, G. Á., et al. 2006, ApJ, 650, 1160Google Scholar
Bouchy, F., et al. 2005, A&A, 444, L15Google Scholar
Burrows, A., Sudarsky, D., & Hubeny, I. 2006, ApJ, 650, 1140Google Scholar
Ghasempour, A., Muterspaugh, M., Hutter, D., et al. 2012, American Astronomical Society Meeting 219, Abstract #446.13Google Scholar
McArthur, B. E., Endl, M., Cochran, W. D., et al. 2004, ApJL, 614, L81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monnier, J. D., et al. 2006a, Proc. SPIE, 6268Google Scholar
Monnier, J. D., et al. 2007, Science, 317, 342Google Scholar
Monnier, J. D. 2007, New Astronomy Review, 51, 604Google Scholar
van Belle, G. T. 2008, PASP, 120, 617Google Scholar
von Braun, K., Boyajian, T. S., ten Brummelaar, T. A., et al. 2011, ApJ, 740, 49Google Scholar
Zhao, M., Monnier, J. D., Che, X., et al. 2011, PASP, 123, 964CrossRefGoogle Scholar