Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T15:24:05.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Differential Rotation and Magnetism in Simulations of Fully Convective Stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2011

Matthew K. Browning*
Affiliation:
Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 60 St. George St, Toronto, Canada email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Stars of sufficiently low mass are convective throughout their interiors, and so do not possess an internal boundary layer akin to the solar tachocline. Because that interface figures so prominently in many theories of the solar magnetic dynamo, a widespread expectation had been that fully convective stars would exhibit surface magnetic behavior very different from that realized in more massive stars. Here I describe how recent observations and theoretical models of dynamo action in low-mass stars are partly confirming, and partly confounding, this basic expectation. In particular, I present the results of 3–D MHD simulations of dynamo action by convection in rotating spherical shells that approximate the interiors of 0.3 solar-mass stars at a range of rotation rates. The simulated stars can establish latitudinal differential rotation at their surfaces which is solar-like at “rapid” rotation rates (defined within) and anti-solar at slower rotation rates; the differential rotation is greatly reduced by feedback from strong dynamo-generated magnetic fields in some parameter regimes. I argue that this “flip” in the sense of differential rotation may be observable in the near future. I also briefly describe how the strength and morphology of the magnetic fields varies with the rotation rate of the simulated star, and show that the maximum magnetic energies attained are compatible with simple scaling arguments.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Browning, M. K., 2008, ApJ, 676, 1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, M. K., Basri, G., Marcy, G. W., West, A. A., & Zhang, J., 2010, AJ, 139, 504Google Scholar
Brun, A. S., Miesch, M. S., & Toomre, J. 2004, ApJ, 614, 1073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, U. R., Holzwarth, V., & Reiners, A., 2009, Nature, 457, 167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donati, J. F., Forveille, T., Cameron, A. C., Barnes, J. R., Delfosse, X., Jardine, M. M., & Valenti, J. A., 2006, Science, 311, 633Google Scholar
Durney, B. R., De Young, B. S., & Roxburgh, I. W., 1993, Sol. Phys., 145, 207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Featherstone, N. A., Browning, M. K., Brun, A. S., & Toomre, J., 2009, ApJ, 706, 1000Google Scholar
Gilman, P. A., 1977, GAPFD, 8, 93Google Scholar
Miesch, M. S., Elliott, J. R., Toomre, J., Clune, T. L., Glatzmaier, G. A., & Gilman, P. A., 2000, ApJ, 532, 593Google Scholar
Mohanty, S. & Basri, G., 2003, ApJ, 583, 451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morin, J., et al. , 2010, MNRAS 1077Google Scholar
Ossendrijver, M. 2003, Astron. Astrophys. Rev., 11, 287Google Scholar
Parker, E. N. 1993, ApJ, 408, 707Google Scholar
Reiners, A. & Basri, G., 2009, A&A, 496, 787Google Scholar
Reiners, A., Basri, G., & Christensen, U. R., 2009, ApJ, 697, 373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spruit, H. C. 2010, arXiv:1004.4545Google Scholar