Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:19:13.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Delayed Galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2007

Curtis Struck
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames IA 50011, email: [email protected]
Mark Hancock
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Astronomy, and Geology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City TN 37614
Beverly J. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Astronomy, and Geology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City TN 37614
Phillip N. Appleton
Affiliation:
Spitzer Science Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91125
Vassilis Charmandaris
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Crete, Heraklion Greece 71003
Mark Giroux
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Astronomy, and Geology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City TN 37614
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We can define Delayed Galaxies as a class of rare galaxies that maintained the bulk of their gas for most of the age of the universe following the initial formation of their disks, with little or no star formation. Invisible galaxies and Malin 1 type low-surface-brightness galaxies qualify as class members. Rare examples among interacting galaxies show that collisions can restart the stalled evolution of such galaxies, and suggest that other members of the Delayed class can be found among interacting systems with vigorous current star formation.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Amran, P., Marcelin, M., Boulesteix, J., & le Coarer, E. 1989, A&AS 81, 59Google Scholar
Barth, A. J. 2007, AJ, 133, 1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charmandaris, V., et al. , 1999, A&A, 341, 69Google Scholar
Elmegreen, D. M., Sundin, M., Elmegreen, B. G., & Sundelius, B. 1991 A&A, 244, 52Google Scholar
Hancock, M., et al. 2007a, AJ, 133, 676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, M., et al. 2007b, AJ, submittedGoogle Scholar
Higdon, J. L. 1996, ApJ, 467, 241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horellou, C., Charmandaris, V., Combes, F., Appleton, P. N., Casoli, F., & Mirabel, I. F. 1998 A&A, 340, L51Google Scholar
Kaufman, M., et al. , 1997, AJ, 114, 2323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamers, H. J. G. L. M. 1997, arXiv:0704.3159Google Scholar
Moore, L., & Parker, Q. A. 2006, PASA, 23, 165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owers, M. S., Blake, C., Couch, W. J., Pracy, M. B., & Bekki, K. 2007, MNRAS, submitted (arXiv:0707.2566)Google Scholar
Pickering, T. E., Impey, C. D., van Gorkom, J. H., & Bothun, G. D. 1997, AJ, 114, 1858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheepmaker, R. A., et al. , 2007, AJ, 114, 2323Google Scholar
Smith, B. J., Struck, C., Hancock, M., Appleton, P. N., Charmandaris, V., & Reach, W. 2007, AJ, 133, 791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toomre, A., & Toomre, J. 1972, ApJ, 178, 623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorobyov, E. I., & Bizyaev, D. 2001, A&A, 377, 835Google Scholar
Wallin, J. F., & Stuart, B. V. 1992, ApJ, 339, 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmore, B. C., Chandar, R., & Fall, S. M. 2007, AJ, 133, 1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, D. F., & Geller, M. J. 2007, AJ, 134, 527CrossRefGoogle Scholar