Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:25:53.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Deep Astrometric Standards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2007

I. Platais
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University, Department of Physics & Astronomy, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA email: [email protected], [email protected]
A. L. Fey
Affiliation:
US Naval Observatory, Washington DC, USA
S. Frey
Affiliation:
FöMI Satellite Geodetic Observatory, Hungary
S. G. Djorgovski
Affiliation:
Caltech, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
C. Ducourant
Affiliation:
Observatoire de Bordeaux, Floirac, France
Ž. Ivezić
Affiliation:
University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98155, USA
A. Rest
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
C. Veillet
Affiliation:
CFHT, Kamuela, HI 96743, USA
R. F. G. Wyse
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University, Department of Physics & Astronomy, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA email: [email protected], [email protected]
N. Zacharias
Affiliation:
US Naval Observatory, Washington DC, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The advent of next-generation telescopes with very wide fields-of-view creates a need for deep and precise reference frames for astrometric calibrations. The Deep Astrometric Standards (DAS) program is designed to establish such a frame, by providing absolute astrometry at the 5–10 mas level in four 10 deg2 Galactic fields, to a depth of V=25. The source of our basic reference frame is the UCAC2 catalog, significantly improved by additional observations, and new VLBI positions of radio-loud and optically visible QSOs. We describe all the major steps in the construction of the DAS fields and provide the current status of this project.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Condon, J. J., Cotton, W. D., Greissen, E. W., et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 1693Google Scholar
Frey, S., Platais, I., & Fey, A. L. 2007, in Proc. 18th European VLBI for Geodesy and Astrometry Working Meeting, eds. Boehm, J., Pany, A., Schuh, H., p. 111Google Scholar
Gregory, P. C., Scott, W. K., Douglas, K., & Condon, J. J. 1996, ApJS, 103, 427Google Scholar
Kaiser, N. 2004, Proc. SPIE, 5489, 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platais, I., Wyse, R. F. G., & Zacharias, N. 2003, PASP, 118, 107Google Scholar
Platais, I., Kozhurina-Platais, V., Girard, , et al. 2002, AJ, 124, 601Google Scholar
Rapaport, M., Le Campion, J.-F., Soubiran, C., et al. 2001, A&A, 376, 325Google Scholar
Schechter, P., Mateo, M., & Saha, A. 1993, PASP, 105, 1342Google Scholar
Tyson, J. A. 2002, Proc. SPIE, 4836, 10Google Scholar
Zacharias, N., Urban, S. E., Zacharias, M. I., Wycoff, G. L., Hall, D. M., Monet, D. G., & Rafferty, T. J. 2004, AJ, 127, 3043CrossRefGoogle Scholar