Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:42:02.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constraining gamma-ray burst progenitors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2012

Andrew Levan
Andrew Levan*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 9GE, UK, email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The past decade has seen great progress towards the unmasking of the progenitors of gamma-ray bursts, starting with the unambiguous detection of a supernova in the light of the long-GRB 030329 almost ten years ago, and the discovery of the first afterglows to short-GRBs in 2005. Here I review progress towards unveiling the progenitors of both long and short-duration GRBs. Furthermore, I examine the diverse broader population of GRBs and high energy transients, and suggest that a full consideration of this parameter space leads to the conclusion that additional progenitor models are likely to be needed, if we are to understand the complete view of GRBs and the transient high-energy sky.

Keywords

gamma-rays: bursts(stars:) supernovae: general
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 7 , Symposium S279: Death of Massive Stars: Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts , April 2011 , pp. 95 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2012

References

Abadie, J., Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., et al. 2010, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 27, 173001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, J. S., Kulkarni, S. R., & Djorgovski, S. G. 2002, AJ, 123, 1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, J. S., Giannios, D., Metzger, B. D., et al. 2011, Science, 333, 203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrows, D. N., Kennea, J. A., Ghisellini, G., et al. 2011, Nature, 476, 421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campana, S., Mangano, V., Blustin, A. J., et al. 2006, Nature, 442, 1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campana, S., Lodato, G., D'Avanzo, P., et al. 2011, Nature, 480, 69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, R. P., Levan, A. J., Davies, M. B., & Tanvir, N. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Valle, M., Malesani, D., Benetti, S., et al. 2003, A&A, 406, L33Google Scholar
Della Valle, M., Chincarini, G., Panagia, N., et al. 2006, Nature, 444, 1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fruchter, A. S., Levan, A. J., Strolger, L., et al. 2006, Nature, 441, 463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fong, W., Berger, E., & Fox, D. B. 2010, ApJ, 708, 9Google Scholar
Fynbo, J. P. U., Watson, D., Thöne, C. C., et al. 2006, Nature, 444, 1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal-Yam, A., Fox, D. B., Price, P. A., et al. 2006, Nature, 444, 1053Google Scholar
Gehrels, N., Norris, J. P., Barthelmy, S. D., et al. 2006, Nature, 444, 1044Google Scholar
Guseinov, O. K. & Vanek, V. 1974, APSS, 28, L11Google Scholar
Hjorth, J., Sollerman, J., Møller, P., et al. 2003, Nature, 423, 847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjorth, J. & Bloom, J. S. 2011, arXiv:1104.2274Google Scholar
Hurley, K., Boggs, S. E., Smith, D. M., et al. 2005, Nature, 434, 1098Google Scholar
Kouveliotou, C., Meegan, C. A., Fishman, G. J., et al. 1993, ApJL, 413, L101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, N., van Marle, A.-J., & Yoon, S.-C. 2010, New Astronomy Reviews, 54, 206Google Scholar
Larsson, J., Levan, A. J., Davies, M. B., & Fruchter, A. S. 2007, MNRAS, 376, 1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levan, A. J., Tanvir, N. R., Jakobsson, P., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 384, 541Google Scholar
Levan, A. J., Tanvir, N. R., Cenko, S. B., et al. 2011, Science, 333, 199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levesque, E. M., Kewley, L. J., Berger, E., & Zahid, H. J. 2010, AJ, 140, 1557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzger, B. D. & Berger, E. 2012, ApJ, 746, 48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modjaz, M., Kewley, L., Kirshner, R. P., et al. 2008, AJ, 135, 1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakar, E. 2007, Physics Reports, 442, 166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perley, D. A., Cenko, S. B., Bloom, J. S., et al. 2009, AJ, 138, 1690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pian, E., Mazzali, P. A., Masetti, N., et al. 2006, Nature, 442, 1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quataert, E. & Kasen, D. 2012, MNRAS, 419, L1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raskin, C., Scannapieco, E., Rhoads, J., & Della Valle, M. 2008, ApJ, 689, 358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rau, A., Kulkarni, S. R., Law, N. M., et al. 2009, PASP, 121, 1334Google Scholar
Sparre, M., Sollerman, J., Fynbo, J. P. U., et al. 2011, ApJL, 735, L24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanek, K. Z., Matheson, T., Garnavich, P. M., et al. 2003, ApJL, 591, L17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starling, R. L. C., Wiersema, K., Levan, A. J., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 411, 2792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svensson, K. M., Levan, A. J., Tanvir, N. R., Fruchter, A. S., & Strolger, L.-G. 2010, MNRAS, 405, 57Google Scholar
Svensson, K. M., Levan, A. J., Tanvir, N. R., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 25Google Scholar
Tanvir, N. R., Levan, A. J., Fynbo, J. P. U., et al. 2011, GRB Coordinates Network, 11564, 1Google Scholar
Thöne, C. C., de Ugarte Postigo, A., Fryer, C. L., et al. 2011, Nature, 480, 72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vreeswijk, P., Fynbo, J., & Melandri, A. 2011, GRB Coordinates Network, 12648, 1Google Scholar
Woosley, S. E. & heger, A. 2011, arXiv:1110.3842Google Scholar
Zauderer, B. A., Berger, E., Soderberg, A. M., et al. 2011, Nature, 476, 425Google Scholar
Zeh, A., Klose, S., & Hartmann, D. H. 2004, ApJ, 609, 952CrossRefGoogle Scholar