Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:29:37.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Confronting the Models of 3 : 2 QPOs with the Evidence of Near Extreme Kerr Black Hole

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2013

Andrea Kotrlová
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Faculty of Philosophy and Science, Silesian University in Opava, Bezručovo nám. 13, CZ-74601 Opava, Czech Republic email: [email protected]
Gabriel Török
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Faculty of Philosophy and Science, Silesian University in Opava, Bezručovo nám. 13, CZ-74601 Opava, Czech Republic email: [email protected]
Eva Šrámková
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Faculty of Philosophy and Science, Silesian University in Opava, Bezručovo nám. 13, CZ-74601 Opava, Czech Republic email: [email protected]
Zdeněk Stuchlík
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Faculty of Philosophy and Science, Silesian University in Opava, Bezručovo nám. 13, CZ-74601 Opava, Czech Republic email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The black hole mass and spin estimates assuming various specific models of the 3 : 2 high frequency quasi-periodic oscillations (HF QPOs) have been carried out in Török et al. (2005, 2011). Here we briefly summarize some current points. Spectral fitting of the spin acJ/GM2 in the microquasar GRS 1915 + 105 reveals that this system can contain a near extreme rotating black hole (e.g., McClintock et al., 2011). Confirming the high value of the spin would have significant consequences for the theory of the HF QPOs. The estimate of a > 0.9 is almost inconsistent with the relativistic precession (RP), tidal disruption (TD), and the warped disc (WD) model. The epicyclic resonance (Ep) and discoseismic models assuming the c- and g- modes are instead favoured. However, consideration of all three microquasars that display the 3 : 2 HF QPOs leads to a serious puzzle because the differences in the individual spins, such as a = 0.9 compared to a = 0.7, represent a generic problem almost for any unified orbital 3:2 QPO model.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013

References

McClintock, J. E., Narayan, R.Davis, S. W., et al. 2011, CQG, 28, 114009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Török, G., Abramowicz, M. A., Kluźniak, W., & Stuchlík, Z. 2005, A&A, 436, 1Google Scholar
Török, G., Kotrlová, A., Šrámková, E., & Stuchlík, Z. 2011, A&A, 531, 59Google Scholar