Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:51:19.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of Approaches to Photometric Redshift Estimation of Quasars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Yang Tu
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 20A Datun Road, Chaoyang District, 100012, Beijing, P.R.China email: [email protected]
Yan-Xia Zhang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 20A Datun Road, Chaoyang District, 100012, Beijing, P.R.China email: [email protected]
Yong-Heng Zhao
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 20A Datun Road, Chaoyang District, 100012, Beijing, P.R.China email: [email protected]
Hai-Jun Tian
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 20A Datun Road, Chaoyang District, 100012, Beijing, P.R.China email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We probe many kinds of approaches used for photometric redshift estimation of quasars, including KNN (K-nearest neighbor algorithm), Lasso (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator), PLS (Partial Least Square regression), ridge regression, SGD (Stochastic Gradient Descent) and Extra-Trees.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2016 

References

Yanxia, Zhang, He, Ma, Nanbo, Peng, Yongheng, Zhao, Xue-bing, Wu, AJ 2013 146, 22 (10pp)Google Scholar