Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:07:06.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Combining Probes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2015

Anaïs Rassat ,
François Lanusse ,
Donnacha Kirk ,
Ole Host  and
Sarah Bridle
Anaïs Rassat
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Astrophysics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) email: [email protected]
François Lanusse
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Astrophysics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) email: [email protected]
Donnacha Kirk
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Astrophysics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) email: [email protected]
Ole Host
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Astrophysics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) email: [email protected]
Sarah Bridle
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Astrophysics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

With the advent of wide-field surveys, cosmology has entered a new golden age of data where our cosmological model and the nature of dark universe will be tested with unprecedented accuracy, so that we can strive for high precision cosmology. Observational probes like weak lensing, galaxy surveys and the cosmic microwave background as well as other observations will all contribute to these advances. These different probes trace the underlying expansion history and growth of structure in complementary ways and can be combined in order to extract cosmological parameters as best as possible. With future wide-field surveys, observational overlap means these will trace the same physical underlying dark matter distribution, and extra care must be taken when combining information from different probes. Consideration of probe combination is a fundamental aspect of cosmostatistics and important to ensure optimal use of future wide-field surveys.

Keywords

cosmologymethods: statistics
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 10 , Symposium S306: Statistical Challenges in 21st Century Cosmology , May 2014 , pp. 192 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2015 

References

Albrecht, A., Bernstein, G., Cahn, R., et al. 2006, ArXiv e-prints 0609591Google Scholar
Bennett, C. L., Larson, D., Weiland, J. L., et al. 2013, ApJS, 208, 20Google Scholar
Bennett, C. L., Smoot, G. F., & Kogut, A. 1990, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 22, Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 1336–+Google Scholar
Bobin, J., Sureau, F., Paykari, P., et al. 2013, A & A, 553, L4Google Scholar
Boughn, S. P. & Crittenden, R. G. 2002, Physical Review Letters, 88, 021302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debono, I., Rassat, A., Refregier, A., Amara, A., & Kitching, T. D. 2010, MNRAS, 404, 110Google Scholar
Dicke, R. H., Peebles, P. J. E., Roll, P. G., & Wilkinson, D. T. 1965, ApJ, 142, 414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodelson, S. 2003, Modern Cosmology, Amsterdam (Netherlands): Academic Press. ISBN 0-12-219141-2Google Scholar
Dupé, F.-X., Rassat, A., Starck, J.-L., & Fadili, M. J. 2011, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 534, A51Google Scholar
Giannantonio, T., Scranton, R., Crittenden, R., et al. 2008, Physical Review D, 77, 123520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heavens, A. F. & Taylor, A. N. 1995, MNRAS, 275, 483Google Scholar
Joachimi, B. & Bridle, S. L. 2010, A&A, 523, A1Google Scholar
Kirk, D., Lahav, O., Bridle, S., et al. 2013, ArXiv e-prints 1307.8062Google Scholar
Kirk, D., Rassat, A., Host, O., & Bridle, S. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 1647Google Scholar
Lanusse, F., Rassat, A., & Starck, J. 2014, ArXiv e-prints 1406.5989Google Scholar
Laureijs, R., Amiaux, J., Arduini, S., et al. 2011, ArXiv e-prints 1110.3193Google Scholar
Peacock, J. A., Schneider, P., Efstathiou, G., et al. 2006, ESA-ESO Working Group on “Fundamental Cosmology”, Tech. rep., ArXiV e-prints 0610906Google Scholar
Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., et al. 2011, A&A, 536, A1Google Scholar
Rassat, A., Land, K., Lahav, O., & Abdalla, F. B. 2007, MNRAS, 377, 1085Google Scholar
Rassat, A. & Starck, J.-L. 2013, A&A, 557, L1Google Scholar
Rassat, A., Starck, J.-L., & Dupe, F.-X. 2013, A&A, 557, A32Google Scholar
Rassat, A., Starck, J.-L., Paykari, P., Sureau, F., & Bobin, J. 2014, JCAP, 8, 6Google Scholar
Sachs, R. K. & Wolfe, A. M. 1967, Astrophys. J., 147, 73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tegmark, M., Taylor, A. N., & Heavens, A. F. 1997, ApJ, 480, 22CrossRefGoogle Scholar