Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:57:52.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Coevolution (or not) of supermassive black holes and host galaxies: Black hole scaling relations are not biased by selection effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2020

John Kormendy*
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstrasse, D-85748 Garching by Munich, Germany Munich University Observatory, Scheinerstrasse 1, D-81679 Munich, Germany Department of Astronomy, University of Texas at Austin, 2515 Speedway, Mail Stop C1400, Austin, TX78712-1205, USA email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The oral version of this paper summarized Kormendy & Ho 2013, ARA&A, 51, 511. However, earlier speakers at this Symposium worried that selection effects bias the derivation of black hole scaling relations. I therefore added – and this proceedings paper emphasizes – a discussion of why we can be confident that selection effects do not bias the observed correlations between BH mass M and the luminosity, stellar mass, and velocity dispersion of host ellipticals and classical bulges. These are the only galaxy components that show tight BH-host correlations. The scatter plots of M with host properties for pseudobulges and disks are upper envelopes of scatter that does extend to lower BH masses. BH correlations are most consistent with a picture in which BHs coevolve only with classical bulges and ellipticals. Four physical regimes of coevolution (or not) are suggested by Kormendy & Ho 2013 and are summarized here.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2020

References

Baes, M., Buyle, P., Hau, G. K. T., & Dejonghe, H. 2003, MNRAS, 341, L4410.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06680.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baggett, W. E., Baggett, S. M., & Anderson, K. S. J. 1998, AJ, 116, 162610.1086/300525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behroozi, P. S., Wechsler, R. H., & Conroy, C. 2013, ApJ, 770, 5710.1088/0004-637X/770/1/57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, R., Burstein, D., & Faber, S. M. 1992, ApJ, 399, 46210.1086/171940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bureau, M. 2019, in IAU Symposium 353, Galactic Dynamics in the Era of Large Surveys, ed. Valluri, M. & Sellwood, J. A. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), in pressGoogle Scholar
Cappellari, M., Bacon, R., Bureau, M., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 112610.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09981.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vaucouleurs, G. 1959, Handbuch der Physik, 53, 275Google Scholar
Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration 2019, ApJ, 875, L610.3847/2041-8213/ab1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faber, S. M. & Jackson, R. E. 1976, ApJ, 204, 66810.1086/154215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrarese, L. 2002, ApJ, 578, 9010.1086/342308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, D. B. 2006, ApJ, 642, L1710.1086/504351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, D. B. & Drory, N. 2008, AJ, 136, 77310.1088/0004-6256/136/2/773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, D. B., Drory, N., & Fabricius, M. H. 2009, ApJ, 697, 63010.1088/0004-637X/697/1/630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaskell, C. M. 2010, in The First Stars and Galaxies: Challenges for the Next Decade, ed. Whalen, D. J.et al. (Melville, NY: AIP), 261Google Scholar
Gavazzi, G., Franzetti, P., Scodeggio, M., Boselli, A., & Pierini, D. 2000, A&A, 361, 863Google Scholar
Gebhardt, K., Adams, J., Richstone, D., et al. 2011, ApJ, 729, 11910.1088/0004-637X/729/2/119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebhardt, K., Lauer, T. R., Kormendy, J., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 246910.1086/323481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebhardt, K. & Thomas, J. 2009, ApJ, 700, 169010.1088/0004-637X/700/2/1690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, J. E., Peng, C. Y., Kim, M., et al. 2010, ApJ, 721, 2610.1088/0004-637X/721/1/26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschmann, M., Khochfar, S., Burkert, A., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 101610.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17006.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, P. F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T. J., et al. 2006, ApJS, 163, 110.1086/499298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, J. 2008, MNRAS, 386, 224210.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13195.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubble, E. P. 1936, The Realm of the Nebulae (New Haven: Yale University Press)Google Scholar
Jahnke, K. & Macciò, A. V. 2011, ApJ, 734, 9210.1088/0004-637X/734/2/92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, I., Franx, M., & Kjærgaard, P. 1996, MNRAS, 280, 16710.1093/mnras/280.1.167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennicutt, R. C. 1998a, ApJ, 498, 54110.1086/305588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennicutt, R. C. 1998b, ARA&A, 36, 18910.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormendy, J. 1977, ApJ, 218, 33310.1086/155687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormendy, J. 1993, in IAU Symposium 153, Galactic Bulges, ed. Dejonghe, H. & Habing, H. J. (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormendy, J. 2013, in XXIII Canary Islands Winter School of Astrophysics, Secular Evolution of Galaxies, ed. J. Falcón-Barroso & J. H. Knapen (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1 (arXiv:1311.2609)10.1017/CBO9781139547420.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormendy, J. & Bender, R. 2009, ApJ, 691, L14210.1088/0004-637X/691/2/L142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormendy, J. & Bender, R. 2011, Nature, 469, 37710.1038/nature09695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormendy, J. & Bender, R. 2012, ApJS, 198, 210.1088/0067-0049/198/1/2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormendy, J. & Bender, R. 2013, ApJ, 769, L510.1088/2041-8205/769/1/L5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormendy, J., Bender, R., & Cornell, M. E. 2011, Nature, 469, 37410.1038/nature09694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormendy, J., Fisher, D. B., Cornell, M. E., & Bender, R. 2009, ApJS, 182, 21610.1088/0067-0049/182/1/216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormendy, J. & Ho, L. C. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 51110.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormendy, J. & Kennicutt, R. C. 2004, ARA&A, 42, 60310.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauer, T. R., Faber, S. M., Richstone, D., et al. 2007, ApJ, 662, 80810.1086/518223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macchetto, F., Marconi, A., Axon, D. J., et al. 1997, ApJ, 489, 57910.1086/304823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, N. J., Chen, S.-F. S., Ma, C.-P., et al. 2013, ApJ, 768, L2110.1088/2041-8205/768/1/L21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, N. J., Ma, C.-P., Gebhardt, K., et al. 2011, Nature, 480, 21510.1038/nature10636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehrgan, K., Thomas., J., Saglia, R., et al. 2019, ApJ, 887, 19510.3847/1538-4357/ab5856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, D., Ferrarese, L., & Joseph, C. L. 2001, Science, 293, 111610.1126/science.1063896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, C. Y. 2007, ApJ, 671, 109810.1086/522774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusli, S. P., Thomas, J., Saglia, R. P., et al. 2013, AJ, 146, 4510.1088/0004-6256/146/3/45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandage, A. 1961, The Hubble Atlas of Galaxies (Washington: Carnegie Institution of Washington)Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. 1959, ApJ, 129, 24310.1086/146614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulze, A. & Gebhardt, K. 2011, ApJ, 729, 2110.1088/0004-637X/729/1/21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzschild, M. 1979, ApJ, 232, 23610.1086/157282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shankar, F., Bernardi, M., Sheth, R. K.et al. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 311910.1093/mnras/stw678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thater, S. 2019, in IAU Symposium 353, Galactic Dynamics in the Era of Large Surveys, ed. Valluri, M. & Sellwood, J. A. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), in pressGoogle Scholar
Tremaine, S., Gebhardt, K., Bender, R., et al. 2002, ApJ, 574, 74010.1086/341002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsukui, T. 2019, in IAU Symposium 353, Galactic Dynamics in the Era of Large Surveys, ed. Valluri, M. & Sellwood, J. A. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), in pressGoogle Scholar
van den Bosch, R. C. E. 2016, ApJ, 831, 13410.3847/0004-637X/831/2/134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Bosch, R. C. E., Gebhardt, K., Gültekin, K., Yildirim, A., & Walsh, J. E. 2015, ApJS, 218, 1010.1088/0067-0049/218/1/10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. J., Bureau, M., & Cappellari, M. 2009, MNRAS, 400, 166510.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15582.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar