Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:59:43.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The chemical signatures of the Large Magellanic Cloud globular clusters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2008

Alessio Mucciarelli*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Astronomia, Università degli Studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present the first results of a long-term project based on the analysis of high-resolution optical spectra for a sample of Large Magellanic Cloud globular clusters. The final aim is to build a new, reliable metallicity scale for this cluster system and shed some light on the role played by the different chemical contributors (AGB, SN II and SN Ia), in order to understand the chemical enrichment history of the Large Magellanic Cloud. The analysis of 6 young and intermediate-age clusters and 11 field stars, observed with the UVES@FLAMES spectrograph, provides crucial information about the chemical composition of the dominant stellar population of the LMC. All these stars are metal-rich ([Fe/H]~ −0.4 dex), with solar-scaled [α/Fe] ratios, that point toward an enrichment from SN Ia. Moreover, we observed a general depletion for the [Al/Fe] ratio (indication of a chemical enrichment by metal-poor SN II) and a strong enhancement of the [Ba/Y] ratio (likely due to the enrichment by metal-poor AGB stars).

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2009

References

Carrera, R., Gallart, C., Hardy, E., Aparicio, A., & Zinn, R. 2008, AJ, 135, 836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, A. A., Tolstoy, E., Gallagher, J. S. III, & Smecker-Hane, T.A. 2005, AJ, 129, 1465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraro, F. R., Mucciarelli, A., Carretta, E., & Origlia, L. 2006, ApJ, 133, L3Google Scholar
Grocholski, A. J., Cole, A. A., Sarajedini, A., Geisler, D., & Smith, V. V. 2006, AJ, 132, 1630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, V., François, P., Spite, M., Primas, F., & Spite, F. 2000, A&AS, 364, 19Google Scholar
Johnson, J. A., Ivans, I., & Stetson, P. 2006, ApJ, 640, 801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mucciarelli, A., Ferraro, F. R., Origlia, L., & Fusi Pecci, F. 2007a, AJ, 133, 2053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mucciarelli, A., Origlia, L., & Ferraro, F. R. 2007b, AJ, 134, 1813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mucciarelli, A., Carretta, E., Origlia, L., & Ferraro, F. R. 2008, AJ, 136, 375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mucciarelli, A., Origlia, L., & Ferraro, F. R. 2009, AJ, submittedGoogle Scholar
Olszewski, E. W., Schommer, R. A., Suntzeff, N. B., & Harris, H. C. 1991, AJ, 101, 515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pompéia, L., Hill, V., Spite, M., et al. 2008, A&A, 480, 379Google Scholar
Reddy, B. E., Lambert, D. L., & Allende Prieto, C. 2006, MNRAS, 367, 1329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sbordone, L., Bonifacio, P., Buonanno, R., Marconi, G., Monaco, L., & Zaggia, S. 2007, A&A, 465, 815Google Scholar
Travaglio, C., Gallino, R., Arnone, E., Cowan, J., Jordan, F., & Sneden, C. 2006, ApJ, 601, 864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venn, K. A., Irwin, M.Shetrone, M. D., Tout, C. A., Hill, V., & Tolstoy, E. 2004, AJ, 128, 1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar