Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T10:28:38.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chaos identification through the auto-correlation function indicator (ACFI)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2022

Valerio Carruba
Affiliation:
São Paulo State University (UNESP), Guaratinguetá, SP, 12516-410, Brazil email: [email protected]
Safwan Aljbaae
Affiliation:
National Space Research Institute (INPE), C.P. 515, 12227-310, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil
Rita C. Domingos
Affiliation:
São Paulo State University (UNESP), São João da Boa Vista, SP, 13876-750, Brazil
Mariela Huaman
Affiliation:
Universidad tecnológica del Perú (UTP), Cercado de Lima, 15046, Perú
William Barletta
Affiliation:
São Paulo State University (UNESP), Guaratinguetá, SP, 12516-410, Brazil email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Close encounters or resonances overlaps can create chaotic motion in small bodies in the Solar System. Approaches that measure the separation rate of trajectories that start infinitesimally near, or changes in the frequency power spectrum of time series, among others, can discover chaotic motion. In this paper, we introduce the ACF index (ACFI), which is based on the auto-correlation function of time series. Auto-correlation coefficients measure the correlation of a time-series with a lagged duplicate of itself. By counting the number of auto-correlation coefficients that are larger than 5% after a certain amount of time has passed, we can assess how the time series auto-correlates with each other. This allows for the detection of chaotic time-series characterized by low ACFI values.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Carruba, V., Aljbaae, S., Domingos, R. C., Huaman, M., Barletta, W., (2021) CMDA, 133, A38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frahm, KM., Fleckinger, R., Shepelyansky, DL. (2004) Eu- ropean Physical Journal D 29(1), 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Swan, RJ., Safavi-Naini, A., Bollinger, JJ., Rey, AM. (2019) Nature Communications 10, 1581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, K. (1895) Proceed. Royal Society of London , Series I, 58, 240.Google Scholar
Pellegrini, F., Montagero, S. (2007) Physical Review A 76(5):052327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skokos, CH. (2001) Journal of Physics A Mathematical General 34, 10029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skokos, C., Antonopoulos, C., Bountis, T., Vrahatis, M. (2003) Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement 150, 439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skokos, C., Antonopoulos, C., Bountis, TC., Vrahatis, MN. (2004) Journal of Physics A Mathematical General 37, 6269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skokos, CH., Gottwald, GA., Laskar, J. (2016) Lecture Notes in Physics, Berlin Springer Verlag 915:E1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar