Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:31:27.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cepheids with giant companions: A new, abundant source of Cepheid astrophysics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2024

Bogumił Pilecki Open the ORCID record for Bogumił Pilecki [Opens in a new window]
Bogumił Pilecki*
Affiliation:
Centrum Astronomiczne im. Mikołaja Kopernika, PAN, Bartycka 18, 00-716 Warsaw, Poland
*
email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present a progress report of our project aiming to increase the number of known Cepheids in double-lined binary (SB2) systems from six to 100 or more. This will allow us, among other goals, to accurately measure masses for a large sample of Cepheids. Currently, only six accurate Cepheid masses are available, which hinders our understanding of their physical properties and renders the Cepheid mass–luminosity relation poorly constrained. At the same time, Cepheids are widely used for essential measurements (e.g., extragalactic distances, the Hubble constant). To examine Cepheid period–luminosity relations, we selected as binary candidates Cepheids that are too bright for their periods. To date, we have confirmed 56 SB2 systems, including the detection of significant orbital motions of the components for 32. We identified systems with orbital periods up to five times shorter than the shortest reported period to date, as well as systems with mass ratios significantly different from unity (suggesting past merger events). Both features are essential to understand how multiplicity affects the formation and destruction of Cepheid progenitors and what effect this has on global Cepheid properties. We also present eight new systems composed of two Cepheids (only one such system was known before). Among confirmed SB2 Cepheids, there are also several wide-orbit systems. In the future, these may facilitate independent accurate geometric distance measurements to the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds.

Keywords

Cepheidsbinary systemsphysical propertiesP-L relation
Type
Contributed Paper
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 18 , Symposium S376: At the crossroads of astrophysics and cosmology: Period–luminosity relations in the 2020s , December 2022 , pp. 150 - 158
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Anderson, R. I., Saio, H., Ekström, S., et al. 2016, A&A, 591, A8.Google Scholar
Bono, G., Caputo, F., Castellani, V., & Marconi, M. 1999, ApJ, 512, 711–723.Google Scholar
Bono, G., Marconi, M., Cassisi, S., et al. 2005, ApJ, 621, 966–977.Google Scholar
Evans, N. R., Proffitt, C., Carpenter, K. G., et al. 2018, ApJ, 866, 30.Google Scholar
Gallenne, A., Kervella, P., Borgniet, S., et al. 2019a, A&A, 622a, A164.Google Scholar
Gallenne, A., Pietrzyński, G., Graczyk, D., et al. 2019b, A&A, 632b, A31.Google Scholar
Gieren, W., Pilecki, B., Pietrzyński, G., et al. 2015, ApJ, 815, 28.Google Scholar
Leavitt, H. S. & Pickering, E. C. 1912, Harvard College Obs. Circ., 173, 1–3.Google Scholar
Neilson, H. R., Schneider, F. R. N., Izzard, R. G., et al. 2015, A&A, 574, A2.Google Scholar
Pietrzyński, G., Graczyk, D., Gallenne, A., et al. 2019, Nature, 567(7747), 200–203.Google Scholar
Pilecki, B., Gieren, W., Pietrzyński, G., et al. 2018, ApJ, 862, 43.Google Scholar
Pilecki, B., Graczyk, D., Pietrzyński, G., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 436, 953–967.Google Scholar
Pilecki, B., Pietrzyński, G., Anderson, R. I., et al. 2021, ApJ, 910, 118.Google Scholar
Pilecki, B., Thompson, I. B., Espinoza-Arancibia, F., et al. 2022, ApJL, 940, L48.Google Scholar
Riess, A. G., Yuan, W., Macri, L. M., et al. 2022, ApJL, 934, L7.Google Scholar
Sana, H., de Mink, S. E., de Koter, A., et al. 2012, Science, 337, 444.Google Scholar
Soszyński, I., Poleski, R., Udalski, A., et al. 2008, AcA, 58, 163–185.Google Scholar
Soszyński, I., Poleski, R., Udalski, A., et al. 2010, AcA, 60(1), 17–39.Google Scholar
Soszyński, I., Udalski, A., Szymański, M. K., et al. 2017, AcA, 67(2), 103–113.Google Scholar
Valle, G., Marconi, M., Degl’Innocenti, S., & Prada Moroni, P. G. 2009, A&A, 507, 1541–1554.Google Scholar