Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:48:52.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Calibration and Standardisation

Workshop 14

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2019

C. Sterken
C. Sterken*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

One of the great challenges in time-domain astronomy is the problem of combining data obtained at various epochs with very different instruments. These problems are mostly discussed from within a specific observational mode, for example photometry, spectroscopy or imaging. This Workshop explored by example diverse pitfalls of time-domain calibration by discussing calibration and standardisation problems across various types of variables.

Keywords

Stars: imagingstars: individual (AG Car, η Car, CY Aqr, HD 269209, HD 34664, Tr 16-64, Tr 16-65, HD 303308, CPD–59 2628)techniques: photometric
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 14 , Symposium S339: Southern Horizons in Time-Domain Astronomy , November 2017 , pp. 275 - 280
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2019 

References

Freyhammer, L. M. et al. 2001, A&A, 369, 561Google Scholar
Garrison, R. F. 1985, in: Hayes, D. S., Pasinetti, L. E., & Davis Philip, A. G. (eds.), Calibration of Fundamental Stellar Quantities, Proc. IAUS 111 (Springer), p. 27Google Scholar
Grmek, M. D. 1981, in: Grmek, M. D. et al. (eds.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science (Springer), Vol 34, p. 10Google Scholar
Herschel, J. F. W. 1847, Results of astronomical observations made during the years 1834, 5, 6, 7, 8, at the Cape of Good Hope (London: Smith, Elder & Co.), p. 38Google Scholar
Hippke, M., et al. 2017 ApJ, 837, 85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laycock, S., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z., et al. 1992, in: MacGillivray, H. T. & Thomson, E. B. (eds.), Digitised Optical Sky Surveys (Kluwer), p. 193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, N. D., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 5417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, B. E. 2016, ApJ, 822, 34LCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterken, C. 2007, in: The Future of Photometric, Spectrophotometric and Polarimetric Standardization, ASPCS, 364, 613Google Scholar
Sterken, C. 2010, in: Sterken, C., Samus, N. & Szabados, L. (eds.), Variable Stars, the Galactic halo and Galaxy Formation (SAI, Moscow), p. 125Google Scholar
Sterken, C. 2011, IBVS, 6000Google Scholar
Sterken, C., et al. 1999, A&A, 346, 33Google Scholar
Tsubaki, T., & Engvold, O. 1975, AAS Photo-Bulletin, 9, 17Google Scholar
Tuvikene, T., et al. 2007, in: The Future of Photometric, Spectrophotometric and Polarimetric Standardization, ASPCS, 364, 579Google Scholar
van Genderen, A. M., et al. 1994, in: Sterken, C. & de Groot, M. (eds.), The Impact of Long-Term Monitoring on Variable Star Research (Kluwer), NATO ASI Series C, 436, 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar