Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:00:47.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bridging planets and stars using scaling laws in anelastic spherical shell dynamos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

R. K. Yadav ,
T. Gastine ,
U. R. Christensen  and
L. Duarte
R. K. Yadav
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, 37191 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany Institut für Astrophysik, Georg-August-Universität, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
T. Gastine
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, 37191 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany
U. R. Christensen
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, 37191 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany
L. Duarte
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, 37191 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Dynamos operating in the interiors of rapidly rotating planets and low-mass stars might belong to a similar category where rotation plays a vital role. We quantify this similarity using scaling laws. We analyse direct numerical simulations of Boussinesq and anelastic spherical shell dynamos. These dynamos represent simplified models which span from Earth-like planets to rapidly rotating low-mass stars. We find that magnetic field and velocity in these dynamos are related to the available buoyancy power via a simple power law which holds over wide variety of control parameters.

Keywords

stars: low-massbrown dwarfsstars: magnetic fieldconvectionmethods: numerical
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 9 , Symposium S302: Magnetic Fields throughout Stellar Evolution , August 2013 , pp. 174 - 175
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Jones, C. A. 2011, Annual Rev. of Fluid Mech., 43, 583Google Scholar
Christensen, . 2010, Spa. Sci. Rev., 152, 565Google Scholar
Christensen, U. R. & Aubert, J. 2006, Geophys. J. Int., 166, 97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, U. R., Holzwarth, V., & Reiners, A. 2009, Nature, 457, 167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duarte, L. D., Gastine, T., & Wicht, J. 2013, Phys. Earth and Planet Int., 222, 22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, M., Becker, A., Lorenzen, W., et al. 2012, ApJS, 202, 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gastine, T., Duarte, L., & Wicht, J. 2012, A&A, 546, A19Google Scholar
Gastine, T., Morin, J., Duarte, L., et al. 2013, A&A, 549, L5Google Scholar
Yadav, R. K., Gastine, T., & Christensen, U. R. 2013a, Icarus, 225, 185Google Scholar
Yadav, R. K., Gastine, T., Christensen, U. R., & Duarte, L. D. 2013b, ApJ, 774, 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar