Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:05:59.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Update on the ACS Virgo and Fornax Cluster Surveys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2007

Patrick Côté
Affiliation:
Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics, Victoria, Canada
Laura Ferrarese
Affiliation:
Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics, Victoria, Canada
Andrés Jordán
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA
John P. Blakeslee
Affiliation:
Washington State University, Pullman, WA
Chin-Wei Chen
Affiliation:
Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics, Victoria, Canada National Central University, Taiwan
Leopoldo Infante
Affiliation:
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile
Simona Mei
Affiliation:
Observatoire de Paris, France
Eric W. Peng
Affiliation:
Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics, Victoria, Canada
John L. Tonry
Affiliation:
Institute for Astronomy, Honolulu, USA
Michael J. West
Affiliation:
European Southern Observatory, Santiago, Chile
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present a brief update on the ACS Virgo and Fornax Cluster Surveys — Hubble Space Telescope programs to obtain ACS imaging for 143 early-type galaxies in the two galaxy clusters nearest to the Milky Way. We summarize a selection of science highlights from the surveys as including new results on the central structure of early-type galaxies, the apparent continuity of photometric and structural parameters between dwarf and giant galaxies, and the properties of globular clusters, diffuse star clusters and ultra-compact dwarf galaxies.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Aguerri, , et al. 2005, AJ, 130, 475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binggeli, B., Sandage, A., & Terenghi, M. 1984, AJ, 89, 64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binggeli, B., Sandage, A., & Tammann, G.A. 1985, AJ, 90, 1681Google Scholar
Caldwell, N. 1983, AJ, 88, 804Google Scholar
Caldwell, N. 1987, AJ, 94, 1116Google Scholar
Côté, P., et al. 2004, ApJS, 153, 223 (ACSVCS Paper I)Google Scholar
Côté, P., et al. 2006, ApJS, 165, 57 (ACSVCS Paper VIII)Google Scholar
Côté, P., et al. 2007, ApJ, in press (ACSFCS Paper II)Google Scholar
Drinkwater, M. J., et al. 2000, PASA, 17, 227Google Scholar
Ebisuzaki, T., Makino, J., & Okumura, S.K. 1991, Nature, 354, 212Google Scholar
Faber, S. M., et al. 1997, AJ, 114, 1771Google Scholar
Ferguson, H. C. 1989, AJ, 98, 367Google Scholar
Ferrarese, L., et al. 1994, AJ, 108, 1598Google Scholar
Ferrarese, L., et al. 2006a, ApJ, 164, 334 (ACSVCS Paper VI)Google Scholar
Ferrarese, L., et al. 2006b, ApJ 644, L21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrarese, L., et al. 2006c, arXiv:astro-ph/0612139Google Scholar
Ford, H. C., et al. 1998, Proc. SPIE, 3356, 234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavazzi, G., et al. 2005, A&A, 430, 411Google Scholar
Graham, A. W., et al. 2003, AJ, 125, 2951Google Scholar
Graham, A. W., & Guzmán, R. 2003, AJ, 125, 2936Google Scholar
Grant, N. I., Kuipers, J. A., & Phillipps, S. 2005, MNRAS, 363, 1019Google Scholar
Harris, W. E. 2001, Saas-Fee Advanced Course 28: Star Clusters, 223Google Scholar
Haşegan, et al. 2005, ApJ, 627, 203 (ACSVCS Paper VII)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilker, M., et al. 1999, A&AS, 134, 75Google Scholar
Jerjen, H., & Binggeli, B. 1997, in ASP Conference Series, Vol. 116, p. 239Google Scholar
Jerjen, H., Binggeli, B., & Freeman, K. C. 2000, AJ, 119, 593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerjen, H., Binggeli, B., & Barazza, F. D. 2004, AJ, 127, 771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordán, A., et al. 2004a, ApJS, 154, 509 (ACSVCS Paper II; J04)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordán, A., et al. 2004b, ApJ, 613, 279 (ACSVCS Paper III)Google Scholar
Jordán, A., et al. 2005, ApJ, 634, 1002 (ACSVCS Paper X)Google Scholar
Jordán, A., et al. 2006, ApJ 651, L25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordán, A., et al. 2007a, ApJS, 169, 213 (ACSFCS Paper I)Google Scholar
Jordán, A., et al. 2007b, ApJS 171, 101 (ACSVCS Paper XII)Google Scholar
King, I. R. 1966, AJ, 71, 64Google Scholar
Kormendy, J. 1985, ApJ, 29573Google Scholar
Larsen, S. S., & Brodie, J. P. 2000, AJ, 120, 2938Google Scholar
Lauer, T. R., et al. 1995, AJ, 110, 2622Google Scholar
Lauer, T. R., et al. 2007, ApJ, 664, 226Google Scholar
McConnachie, A. W., & Irwin, M. J. 2006, MNRAS, 365, 1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mei, S., et al. 2005a, ApJS 156, 113 (ACSVCS Paper IV)Google Scholar
Mei, S., et al. 2005b, ApJ 625, 121 (ACSVCS Paper V)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mei, S., et al. 2007, ApJ, 655, 144 (ACSVCS Paper XIII)Google Scholar
Mihos, J. C., & Hernquist, L. 1994, ApJ, 437, L47Google Scholar
Neilsen, E. H., & Tsvetanov, Z. I. 2000, ApJ, 536, 255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, E. W. et al. 2006a, ApJ 639, 95 (ACSVCS Paper IX)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, E. W. et al. 2006b, ApJ 639, 838 (ACSVCS Paper XI)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, E. W. et al. 2007, ApJ, submitted (ACSVCS Paper XV)Google Scholar
Ravindranath, S., Ho, L. C., & Filippenko, A. V. 2002, ApJ, 566, 801Google Scholar
Rest, A., et al. 2001, AJ, 121, 2431Google Scholar
Sérsic, J.-L. 1968, Atlas de Galaxias Australes (Córdoba: Obs. Astron., Univ. Nac. Córdova)Google Scholar
Sivakoff, G. R., et al. 2007, ApJ, 660, 1246Google Scholar
Stiavelli, M., et al. 2001, AJ, 121, 1385Google Scholar
Tonry, J. L., et al. 2000, ApJ, 530, 625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasuda, N., Fukugita, M., & Okamura, S. 1997, ApJS, 108, 417Google Scholar
Young, C. K., & Currie, M.J. 1995, MNRAS, 273, 1141Google Scholar
Zibetti, S., et al. 2005, in IAU Colloq. 198, p. 380Google Scholar