Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:59:59.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AGN feedback and galaxy evolution in nearby galaxy groups using CLoGS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2021

Konstantinos Kolokythas
Affiliation:
Centre for Space Research, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa emails: [email protected] (KK), CLoGS: http://www.sr.bham.ac.uk/ejos/CLoGS.html
CLoGS team
Affiliation:
Centre for Space Research, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa emails: [email protected] (KK), CLoGS: http://www.sr.bham.ac.uk/ejos/CLoGS.html
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Much of the evolution of galaxies takes place in groups where feedback has the greatest impact on galaxy formation and evolution. We summarize results from studies of the central brightest group early-type galaxies (BGEs) of an optically selected, statistically complete sample of 53 nearby groups (<80 Mpc; CLoGS sample), observed in radio 235/610 MHz (GMRT), CO (IRAM/APEX) and X-ray (Chandra and XMM-Newton) frequencies. We characterize the radio-AGN population of the BGEs, their group X-ray environment and examine the jet energetics impact on the intra-group gas. We discuss the relation between the radio properties of the BGEs and their group X-ray environment along with the relation between the molecular gas content and the star formation that BGEs present. We conclude that AGN feedback in groups can appear as relatively gentle near-continuous thermal regulation, but also as extreme AGN activity which could potentially shut down cooling for longer periods.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

Footnotes

KK acknowledges support from the Grants for IAU Symposia and Regional IAU Meetings

References

Alonso, S., Mesa, V., Padilla, N., et al. 2012, A&A, 539, 46 Google Scholar
Eke, V. R., Baugh, C. M., Cole, S., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 1147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolokythas, K., O’Sullivan, E., Giacintucci, S., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 1732 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolokythas, K., O’Sullivan, E., Raychaudhury, S., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 1550 Google Scholar
Kolokythas, K., O’Sullivan, E., Intema, H., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 2488 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolokythas, K., O’Sullivan, E., Giacintucci, S., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 1471 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, B. & Nulsen, P. 2007, ARA&A, 45, 117 Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, E., Combes, F., Hamer, S., et al. 2015, A&A, 573, 111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Sullivan, E., Ponman, T. J., Kolokythas, K., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 472, 1482 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Sullivan, E., Combes, F., Salome, P., et al. 2018a, A&A, 618, 126 Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, E., Kolokythas, K., Kantharia, N. G., et al. 2018b, MNRAS, 473, 5248 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponman, T. J., Cannon, D. B., & Navarro, J. F. 1999, Nature, 397, 135, 33 CrossRefGoogle Scholar