Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T06:44:32.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The age-metallicity relation in the thin disk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2008

Ji Li ,
Bo Liang  and
Weishi Fan
Ji Li
Affiliation:
College of Physics and Information Engineering, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhaung 050016, P. R. China email: [email protected]
Bo Liang
Affiliation:
College of Physics and Information Engineering, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhaung 050016, P. R. China email: [email protected]
Weishi Fan
Affiliation:
College of Physics and Information Engineering, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhaung 050016, P. R. China email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

With two stellar sample A and B, the age-metallicity relation (AMR) in the Galactic thin disk is investigated. The results show two different AMRs: one is a nearly flat AMR from photometric analysis of sample A, the other is an obvious AMR derived from spectroscoipic analysis of sample B.

Keywords

Galaxy: solar neighbourhoodGalaxy: diskGalaxy: kinematics and dynamicsGalaxy: evolutionStars: fundamental parameters
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 4 , Symposium S252: The Art of Modeling Stars in the 21st Century , April 2008 , pp. 265 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Bensby, T., Feltzing, S., & Lundström, I. 2004, A&A 421, 969Google Scholar
Bensby, T., Feltzing, S., & Lundström, I., et al. 2005, A&A 433, 185Google Scholar
Brewer, Mary-Margaret & Carney Bruce, W. 2006, AJ 131, 431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edvardsson, B., Andersen, J., Gustafsson, B., et al. 1993 A&A 275, 101Google Scholar
Feltzing, S., Holmberg, J., & Hurley, J. R. 1983, A&A 377, 911Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, K. 2004, AN 325, 3Google Scholar
Fulbright, J. P. 2000, AJ 120, 1841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehren, T., Liang, Y. C., & Shi, J. R. et al. 2004, A&A 413, 1045.Google Scholar
Gratton, R. G, Carretta, E., & Claudi, R., et al. 2003, A&A 404, 187Google Scholar
Haywood, M. 2006, MNRAS 371, 1760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehin, E., Magain, P., & Neuforge, C., et al. 1999, A&A 341, 241Google Scholar
Jonsell, K., Edvardsson, B., & Gustafsson, B., et al. 2005, A&A 440, 321Google Scholar
Meusinger, H., Srecklum, B., & Reimann, H-G. 1991, A&A 245, 57Google Scholar
Mishenina, T. V. & Kovtyukh, V. V. 2001, A&A 370, 951Google Scholar
Ng, Y. K. & Bertelli, G. 1998, A&A 329, 943Google Scholar
Nordström, B., Mayor, M., & Andersen, J., et al. 2004, A&A 418, 989Google Scholar
Reddy, B. E., Tomkin, J., & Lambert, D. L., et al. 2003, MNRAS 340, 304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, B. E., Lambert, D. L., & Prieto, C. A. 2006, MNRAS 367, 1329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocha-Pinto, H. J., Maciel, W. J., & Scalo, J., et al. 2000, A&A 358, 850Google Scholar
Twarog, B. A. 1980, ApJS 44, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yi, S., Demarque, P., & Kim, Y. C., et al. 2003, ApJS 144, 256CrossRefGoogle Scholar