Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:40:50.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The abundance distribution of [α/Fe] in the Galactic disk stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2014

Ji Li  and
Ruijuan Fu
Ji Li
Affiliation:
College of Physics and Information Engineering, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhaung 050024, P. R. China email: [email protected]
Ruijuan Fu
Affiliation:
College of Physics and Information Engineering, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhaung 050024, P. R. China email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The abundance ratio [α/Fe] is a useful tracer to probe the history of star formation and the chemical evolution of the Galaxy. We present a statistical analysis of [α/Fe] in 953 dwarf stars to investigate the distributions of [α/Fe] in the the thin- and thick-disk stars.

Keywords

Galaxy: diskstars: abundancesstars: kinematicsstars: fundamental parameters
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 9 , Symposium S298: Setting the scene for Gaia and LAMOST , May 2013 , pp. 419 - 420
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Bensby, T., Feltzing, S., & Lundström, I. 2003, A&A 410, 527Google Scholar
Bensby, T., Feltzing, S., Lundström, I., et al. 2005, A&A 433, 185Google Scholar
Bovy, J., Rix Hans-Walter, , & Hogg, D. W. 2012, ApJ 751, 131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Mary-Margaret, Carney, Bruce W. 2006, AJ 131, 431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y. Q., Nissen, P. E., Zhao, G., et al. 2000, A&A 141, 431Google Scholar
Edvardsson, B., Andersen, J., Gustafsson, B., et al. 1993, A&A 275, 101Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, K. 2004, AN 325, 3Google Scholar
Fulbright, J. P. 2000, AJ 120, 1841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratton, R. G., Carretta, E., Claudi, R., et al. 2003, A&A 404, 187Google Scholar
Haywood, M. 2006, MNRAS 371, 1760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehin, E., Magain, P., Neuforge, C., et al. 1999, A&A 341, 241Google Scholar
Jonsell, K., Edvardsson, B., Gustafsson, B., et al. 2005, A&A 440, 321Google Scholar
Lee, Y. S., Beers, T. C., An, D., et al. 2011, ApJ 738, 187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meusinger, H., Srecklum, B., Reimann, H-G. 1991, A&A 245, 57Google Scholar
Mishenina, T. V. & Kovtyukh, V. V. 2001, A&A 370, 951Google Scholar
Mishenina, T. V., Soubiran, C., & Kovtyukh, V. V. 2004, A&A 370, 951Google Scholar
Prochaska, J. X., Naumov, S. O., Carney, B. W., et al. 2004, A&A 418, 989Google Scholar
Reddy, B. E., Tomkin, J., Lambert, D. L., et al. 2003, MNRAS 340, 304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, B. E., Lambert, D. L., & Prieto, C. A. 2006, MNRAS 367, 1329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, B. E. & Lambert, D. L. 2008, MNRAS 391, 95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H. W. & Zhao, G. 2006 A&A, 449, 127Google Scholar