Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:31:20.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

6th and 8th Order Hermite Integrator Using Snap and Crackle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2007

Keigo Nitadori ,
Masaki Iwasawa  and
Junichiro Makino
Keigo Nitadori
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan email: [email protected]
Masaki Iwasawa
Affiliation:
Department of General System Studies, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 3-8-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902 email: [email protected]
Junichiro Makino
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8588, Japan email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present sixth- and eighth-order Hermite integrators for astrophysical N-body simulations, which use the derivatives of accelerations up to second order (snap) and third order (crackle). These schemes do not require previous values for the corrector, and require only one previous value to construct the predictor. Thus, they are fairly easy to be implemented. The additional cost of the calculation of the higher order derivatives is not very high. Even for the eighth-order scheme, the number of floating-point operations for force calculation is only about two times larger than that for traditional fourth-order Hermite scheme. The sixth order scheme is better than the traditional fourth order scheme for most cases. When the required accuracy is very high, the eighth-order one is the best.

Keywords

stellar dynamicsmethods: n-body simulationsmethods: numerical
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 3 , Symposium S246: Dynamical Evolution of Dense Stellar Systems , September 2007 , pp. 473 - 474
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Aarseth, J. S., 2003, Gravitational N-Body Simulations [Cambridge Univ. Pr.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heggie, D. C. & Mathieu, R. D. 1986, The Use of Supercomputers in Stellar Dynamics, 267, 233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makino, J., 1991, ApJ 369, 200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makino, J. 1991b, PASJ, 43, 859Google Scholar
Makino, J. & Aarseth, S. 1992, PASJ, 44, 141Google Scholar
McMillan, S. L. W. 1986, in The Use of Supercomputer in Stellar Dynamics, ed. Hut, P. & McMillan, S. (New York: Springer), 156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitadori, K., Makino, J., & Hut, P. 2006, New Astronomy, 12, 169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitadori, K. & Makino, J. 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 708, arXiv:0708.0738Google Scholar
Warren, M. S., Salmon, J. K., Becker, D. J., Goda, M. P., & Sterling, T. 1997, In The SC97 Proceedings, CD–ROM. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CAGoogle Scholar