Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:33:25.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

24 synoptic maps 1974-1982 (ascending phase of cycle XXI) of 323 prominence average magnetic fields measured by the Hanle effect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2014

Véronique Bommier
Véronique Bommier*
Affiliation:
LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS-INSU-UMR8109, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, Université Paris Diderot-Paris 7; 5, Place Jules Janssen, 92190 Meudon, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The poster was made of 323 average prominence magnetic fields reported on 24 synoptic maps. The paper first resumes the methods for the field derivation, and the different results of the whole program of these second generation Hanle effect observations. From their conclusions, it was possible to derive a unique field vector for each of the 323 prominences. The maps put in evidence a large scale structure of the prominence magnetic field, probably distorted by the differential rotation, which leads to a systematically small angle (on the order of 30°) between the field vector and the prominence long axis.

Keywords

ProminencesMagnetic FieldHanle effectPolarization
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 8 , Symposium S300: Nature of Prominences and their role in Space Weather , June 2013 , pp. 397 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013 

References

Athay, R. G., Querfeld, C. W., Smartt, , et al. 1983, Solar Phys., 89, 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bommier, V. 2009, in Lecture Notes in Physics, BerlinSpringer Verlag, Vol. 765, 231–259Google Scholar
Bommier, V., Landi Degl'Innocenti, E., Leroy, J.-L., & Sahal-Brechot, S. 1994, Solar Phys., 154, 231Google Scholar
Bommier, V., Leroy, J. L., & Sahal-Brechot, S. 1986a, Astron. Astrophys., 156, 90Google Scholar
Bommier, V. & Sahal-Brechot, S. 1978, Astron. Astrophys., 69, 57Google Scholar
Bommier, V., Sahal-Brechot, S., & Leroy, J. L. 1981, Astron. Astrophys., 100, 231Google Scholar
Bommier, V., Sahal-Brechot, S., & Leroy, J. L. 1986b, Astron. Astrophys., 156, 79Google Scholar
Hyder, C. L. 1965, Astrophys. J., 141, 1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landi Degl'Innocenti, E., Bommier, V., & Sahal-Brechot, S. 1987, Astron. Astrophys., 186, 335Google Scholar
Leroy, J. L., Bommier, V., & Sahal-Brechot, S. 1983, Solar Phys., 83, 135Google Scholar
Leroy, J. L., Bommier, V., & Sahal-Brechot, S. 1984, Astron. Astrophys., 131, 33Google Scholar
Leroy, J. L., Ratier, G., & Bommier, V. 1977, Astron. Astrophys., 54, 811Google Scholar
Lyot, B. 1934, Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci., 198, 249Google Scholar
Lyot, B. 1934, Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci., 202, 392Google Scholar
Querfeld, C. W., Smartt, R. N., Bommier, V., et al. 1985, Solar Phys., 96, 277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratier, G. 1975, Nouvelle Revue d'Optique, 6, 149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahal-Brechot, S. 1981, Space Sci. Rev., 29, 391Google Scholar
Sahal-Brechot, S., Bommier, V., & Leroy, J. L. 1977, Astron. Astrophys., 59, 223Google Scholar