Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-02T01:52:19.252Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gorenstein model structures and generalized derived categories

Part of: Applied homological algebra and category theory Homological algebra Abelian categories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2010

James Gillespie  and
Mark Hovey
James Gillespie
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Penn State Greater Allegheny, 4000 University Drive, McKeesport, PA 15132-7698, USA ([email protected])
Mark Hovey
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT 06459, USA ([email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In a paper from 2002, Hovey introduced the Gorenstein projective and Gorenstein injective model structures on R-Mod, the category of R-modules, where R is any Gorenstein ring. These two model structures are Quillen equivalent and in fact there is a third equivalent structure we introduce: the Gorenstein flat model structure. The homotopy category with respect to each of these is called the stable module category of R. If such a ring R has finite global dimension, the graded ring R[x]/(x2) is Gorenstein and the three associated Gorenstein model structures on R[x]/(x2)-Mod, the category of graded R[x]/(x2)-modules, are nothing more than the usual projective, injective and flat model structures on Ch(R), the category of chain complexes of R-modules. Although these correspondences only recover these model structures on Ch(R) when R has finite global dimension, we can set R = ℤ and use general techniques from model category theory to lift the projective model structure from Ch(ℤ) to Ch(R) for an arbitrary ring R. This shows that homological algebra is a special case of Gorenstein homological algebra. Moreover, this method of constructing and lifting model structures carries through when ℤ[x]/(x2) is replaced by many other graded Gorenstein rings (or Hopf algebras, which lead to monoidal model structures). This gives us a natural way to generalize both chain complexes over a ring R and the derived category of R and we give some examples of such generalizations.

Keywords

Gorenstein ringderived categorymodel categorygeneralized chain complexstable module category

MSC classification

Secondary: 18E30: Derived categories, triangulated categories 18G35: Chain complexes 55U15: Chain complexes 55U35: Abstract and axiomatic homotopy theory
Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , October 2010 , pp. 675 - 696
Copyright
Copyright © Edinburgh Mathematical Society 2010

References

1. Dubois-Violette, M., d N= 0: generalized homology, K-Theory 14(1998), 371–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Eilenberg, S. and Nakayama, T., On the dimension of modules and algebras, II, Frobenius algebras and quasi-Frobenius rings, Nagoya Math. J. 9(1955), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Enochs, E. and García Rozas, J. R., Tensor products of chain complexes, Math. J. Okayama Univ. 39(1997), 19–42.Google Scholar
4. Enochs, E. and Jenda, O., Gorenstein injective and projective modules, Math. Z. 220(1995), 611–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Enochs, E. and Jenda, O., Relative homological algebra, De Gruyter Expositions in Mathematics, No. 30 (Walter de Gruyter, New York, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Enochs, E. and López Ramos, J. A., Gorenstein flat modules(Nova Scientific Publishers, Huntington, NY, 2001).Google Scholar
7. Estrada, S., Monomial algebras over infinite quivers: applications to N-complexes of modules, Commun. Alg. 35(2007), 3214–3225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. García Rozas, J. R., Covers and envelopes in the category of complexes of modules, Research Notes in Mathematics, No.407 (Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 1999).Google Scholar
9. Gillespie, J., The flat model structure on Ch(R), Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 356(8) (2004), 3369–3390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Gillespie, J., Kaplansky classes and derived categories, Math. Z. 257(4) (2007), 811–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Gillespie, J., Cotorsion pairs and degreewise homological model structures, Homology Homotopy Applic. 10(1) (2008), 283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Hirschhorn, P. S., Model categories and their localizations, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, Volume 99 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2003).Google Scholar
13. Hovey, M., Model categories, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, Volume 63 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999).Google Scholar
14. Hovey, M., Cotorsion pairs, model category structures, and representation theory, Math. Z. 241 (2002), 553–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Iwanaga, Y., On rings with finite self-injective dimension, Commun. Alg. 7(1979), 393–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Iwanaga, Y., On rings with finite self-injective dimension, II, Tsukuba J. Math. 4(1980), 107–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Kassel, C. and Wambst, M., Algèbre homologique des N-complexes et homologie de Hochschild aux racines de l'unité, Publ. RIMS Kyoto 34(1998), 91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Mac Lane, S., Homology, Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Volume 114 (Springer, 1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Martsinkovsky, A., Cohen–Macaulay modules and approximations, in Trends in mathematics: infinite length modules(ed. Krause, H. and Ringel, C.), pp. 167–192 (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Schwede, S. and Shipley, B. E., Algebras and modules in monoidal model categories, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 80(2) (2000), 491–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Tikaradze, A., Homological constructions on N-complexes, J. Pure Appl. Alg. 176(2002), 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar