Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-c4bhq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-09T09:02:56.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards cycling engagement by mapping design interventions to observed barriers: an example from Glasgow's bike share programme

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Mia Shepherd ,
Tripp Shealy ,
Lewis Urquhart ,
Deirdre Harrington  and
Anja Maier
Mia Shepherd*
Affiliation:
University of Strathclyde, United Kingdom
Tripp Shealy
Affiliation:
Virginia Tech, United States of America
Lewis Urquhart
Affiliation:
University of Strathclyde, United Kingdom
Deirdre Harrington
Affiliation:
University of Strathclyde, United Kingdom
Anja Maier
Affiliation:
University of Strathclyde, United Kingdom Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
*
[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The benefits of cycling are well-established, but how to engage people with bikes for active travel is far less understood. This study offers insights into the motivations, barriers, and design solutions associated with cycling. Interviews with 30 bike-share users in Glasgow, UK found a key motivation to be commuting time efficiency and the predominant barrier was shared space with vehicles. Alignment between the most mentioned design solution, dedicated cycling lanes, and the significant barrier of sharing space with vehicles underscores the importance of behavioural design interventions.

Keywords

human behaviourbehavioural designcyclingmobilitytransport
Type
Human Behaviour and Design Creativity
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 1065 - 1074
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Al-Haboubi, M.H., 1999. Modelling energy expenditure during cycling. Ergonomics 42, 416–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401399185568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barberan, A., de Abreu e Silva, J., Monzon, A., 2017. Factors influencing bicycle use: a binary choice model with panel data. Transportation Research Procedia, 20th EURO Working Group on Transportation Meeting, EWGT 2017, 4-6 September 2017, Budapest, Hungary 27, 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.12.097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biehl, A., Ermagun, A., Stathopoulos, A., 2019. Utilizing multi-stage behavior change theory to model the process of bike share adoption. Transport Policy 77, 30–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G., Glanz, H., 2018. Identifying potential NIMBY and YIMBY effects in general land use planning and zoning. Applied Geography 99, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.07.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buehler, R., Goel, R., 2022. Chapter Seven - A global overview of cycling trends, in: Heinen, E., Götschi, T. (Eds.), Advances in Transport Policy and Planning, Cycling. Academic Press, pp. 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.atpp.2022.04.007Google Scholar
Buhl, A., Schmidt-Keilich, M., Muster, V., Blazejewski, S., Schrader, U., Harrach, C., Schäfer, M., Süßbauer, E., 2019. Design thinking for sustainability: Why and how design thinking can foster sustainability-oriented innovation development. Journal of Cleaner Production 231, 1248–1257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgen, S., 2023. Cycle lanes scrapped in south-east Spain as council takes pro-car stance. The Guardian.Google Scholar
Cash, P., Gonçalves, M., Dorst, K., 2023. Method in their madness: Explaining how designers think and act through the cognitive co-evolution model. Design Studies 88, 101219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2023.101219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, M.-C., Kuo, T.-C., Liao, H.-T., 2020. Design for sustainable behavior strategies: Impact of persuasive technology on energy usage. Journal of Cleaner Production 248, 119214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicchino, J.B., McCarthy, M.L., Newgard, C.D., Wall, S.P., DiMaggio, C.J., Kulie, P.E., Arnold, B.N., Zuby, D.S., 2020. Not all protected bike lanes are the same: Infrastructure and risk of cyclist collisions and falls leading to emergency department visits in three U.S. cities. Accident Analysis & Prevention 141, 105490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105490CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crane, N., 2022. Cycling as a form of self-care: Incorporating and sustaining purposeful movement practices to support wellbeing, in: Creative Expression and Wellbeing in Higher Education. Routledge.Google Scholar
Doğru, O.C., Webb, T.L., Norman, P., 2021. What is the best way to promote cycling? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 81, 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.06.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorst, K., Cross, N., 2001. Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution. Design Studies 22, 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00009-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eren, E., Uz, V.E., 2020. A review on bike-sharing: The factors affecting bike-sharing demand. Sustainable Cities and Society 54, 101882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fosgerau, M., Łukawska, M., Paulsen, M., Rasmussen, T.K., 2023. Bikeability and the induced demand for cycling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120, e2220515120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2220515120CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, T.A., 2005. NIMBY and the Civic Good. City & Community 4, 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6040.2005.00144.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldmann, K., Wessel, J., 2021. Some people feel the rain, others just get wet: An analysis of regional differences in the effects of weather on cycling. Research in Transportation Business & Management, Active Travel and Mobility Management 40, 100541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100541Google Scholar
Green, S., Sakuls, P., Levitt, S., 2021. Cycling for health: Improving health and mitigating the climate crisis. Canadian Family Physician 67, 739–742. https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.6710739CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haustein, S., Koglin, T., Nielsen, T.A.S., Svensson, Å., 2020. A comparison of cycling cultures in Stockholm and Copenhagen. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 14, 280–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1547463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, C.B., Morita, A., 2017. Introduction: Infrastructures as Ontological Experiments. Ethnos 82, 615–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2015.1107607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimbell, R., Stables, K., 2007. Researching Design Learning: Issues and Findings from Two Decades of Research and Development, 2007th edition. ed. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong, H., Jin, S.T., Sui, D.Z., 2020. Deciphering the relationship between bikesharing and public transit: Modal substitution, integration, and complementation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 85, 102392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, S.F., Karnilowicz, W., 2015. ‘In Our Country it's Just Poor People who Ride a Bike’: Place, Displacement and Cycling in Australia. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 25, 296–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leyland, L.-A., Spencer, B., Beale, N., Jones, T., Reekum, C.M. van, 2019. The effect of cycling on cognitive function and well-being in older adults. PLOS ONE 14, e0211779. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211779CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lubitow, A., Zinschlag, B., Rochester, N., 2016. Plans for pavement or for people? The politics of bike lanes on the ‘Paseo Boricua’ in Chicago, Illinois. Urban Studies 53, 2637–2653. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015592823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, A., Cash, P., 2022. Designing for Human Behaviour in a Systemic World, in: Maier, A., Oehmen, J., Vermaas, P.E. (Eds.), Handbook of Engineering Systems Design. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 493–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81159-4_16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquart, H., Schlink, U., Ueberham, M., 2020. The planned and the perceived city: A comparison of cyclists’ and decision-makers’ views on cycling quality. Journal of Transport Geography 82, 102602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matias, I., Santos, B., Virtudes, A., 2020. Making Cycling Spaces in Hilly Cities. KnE Engineering 152–165. https://doi.org/10.18502/keg.v5i5.6933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maus, J., 2023. Portlanders stand in front of truck to prevent bike lane removal [WWW Document]. BikePortland. URL https://bikeportland.org/2023/11/01/portlanders-stand-in-front-of-truck-to-prevent-bike-lane-removal-381391 (accessed 11.12.23).Google Scholar
Meadows, Donella H. (2008), Thinking in systems: a primer. Earthscan, London; Sterling, VA. ISBN: 978-1-84407-726-7.Google Scholar
Médard de Chardon, C., Caruso, G., Thomas, I., 2017. Bicycle sharing system ‘success’ determinants. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 100, 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.020Google Scholar
Nello-Deakin, S., Nikolaeva, A., 2021. The human infrastructure of a cycling city: Amsterdam through the eyes of international newcomers. Urban Geography 42, 289–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2019.1709757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesshana, G., Romanel, C., Novo, J., 2020. An Index for Evaluation for Urban Bicycle Lanes. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 503, 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/503/1/012001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pucher, J., Dill, J., Handy, S., 2010. Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: An international review. Preventive Medicine 50, S106–S125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.028CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purcell, A.T., Williams, P., Gero, J.S., Colbron, B., 1993. Fixation Effects: Do They Exist in Design Problem Solving? Environ Plann B Plann Des 20, 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1068/b200333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robartes, E., Chen, E., Chen, T.D., Ohlms, P.B., 2021. Assessment of local, state, and federal barriers to implementing bicycle infrastructure: A Virginia case study. Case Studies on Transport Policy 9, 488–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.02.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rynda, R., Tanaka, V.M.D., Qudsiyah, I., Maharani, N.K.A., Rachelia, D.V., Notoprawiro, N.C., Augusto, K., Wulandari, M.A.M., Juhanna, I.V., 2022. Effect of cycling on Cardiovascular health associate with aging process. Sport and Fitness Journal.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schon, D.A., Wiggins, G., 1992. Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design Studies 13, 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(92)90268-FCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, R., Brennan, C., 2013. Grumbles, gripes and grievances: the role of complaints in transforming public services.Google Scholar
Zhou, J., Guo, Y., Sun, J., Yu, E., Wang, R., 2022. Review of bike-sharing system studies using bibliometrics method. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) 9, 608–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2021.08.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar