Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:57:15.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SUSTAINABLE AND RESILIENT SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT IN A VUCA-WORLD: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY TO DEVELOP A PROCESS ORIENTATED METHOD OF RISK AND TECHNICAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT IN AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Jennifer Lechner  and
Nadine Schlüter
Jennifer Lechner*
Affiliation:
Bergische Universität Wuppertal
Nadine Schlüter
Affiliation:
Bergische Universität Wuppertal
*
Lechner, Jennifer, Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Germany, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Revolutionary changes of a VUCA-world are effecting more and more industries. Focusing the automotive industry, this is caused by several new trends in technology or market. This situation is requiring high flexibility and is questioning for sustainability as well as resilience in system development projects. This publication represents results out of a survey, part of a wider research. The objective is the development of a process orientated method for risk and technical change management. The survey is conducted by participants of transdisciplinary system development in automotive industry. Topics questioned are VUCA, complexity, (re-)action, quality and module interfaces of Generic Systems Engineering. The results demonstrate the participants’ experience and demands for sustainable and resilient system development projects. In conclusion, this report provides information on the considering elements to develop a process orientated method for risk and technical change management in automotive industry.

Keywords

Case studyComplexityIntegrated product developmentProcess modellingProject management
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 3255 - 3264
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Abidi, S./ Joshi, M. (2015). The VUCA Company, How Indian companies have faced Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity & Ambiguity, JAICO, https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262916629015Google Scholar
Alam, D./ Guehl, U., (2022). Project Management for Practice. A Guide and Toolbox for Successful Projects, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-65159-9Google Scholar
Antonaras, A./ Deasley, P. J., (1999). Managing Engineering Change Throughout the New Product/Service Introduction Process Using a Systems Dynamics Approach, Conference: 6th International Product Development Management Conference At: University of Cambridge, UK, http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2062.4166Google Scholar
Bajzek, M./ Fritz, J./ Hick, H., (2021). Systems Engineering Principles in: Hick, H. Dr./ Kuepper, K. Dr./ Sorger, H. Dr., (2021) Systems Engineering for Automotive Powertrain Development, Springer Nature Switzerland AG, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99629-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, K./ Beedle, M./ van Bennekum, M./ Cockburn, A./ Cunningham, W./ Fowler, M./ Grenning, J./ Highsmith, J./ Hunt, A./ Jeffries, R./ Kern, J./ Marick, B./ Martin, R. C./ Mellor, S./ Schwaber, K./ Sutherland, J./ Thomas, D., (2001). Manifesto for Agile Software Development, https://agilemanifesto.org/, dated 2021-06-17Google Scholar
Bennett, D., (2003). Agile or adaptable? Finding a paradigm for an uncertain world. International Journal of Agile Manufacturing, 6(2), 11–22Google Scholar
Bennett, N./ Lemoine, G. J., (2014). What a difference a word makes: Understanding threats to performancein a VUCA world in Business Horizons (2014) 57, pp. 311–317, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundtzen, H., Hinrichs, G., (2021). The Link Between Organizational Agility And VUCA – An Agile Assessment Model, SocioEconomic Challenges, Volume 5, Issue 1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.21272/sec.5(1).35-43.2021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chechile, I., (2021). NewSpace Systems Engineering, Springer Nature Switzerland AG, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66898-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, J./ Eckert, C., (2005). Design process improvement. A review of current practice, Springer London Limited, ISBN: 1–85233-701-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conboy, K./Fitzgerald, B., (2004). Toward a conceptual framework of agile methods: a study of agility in different disciplines. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM workshop on Interdisciplinary software engineering research pp. 37–44, https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1029997.1030005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekkers, R., (2017). Applied Systems Theory, 2nd Edition, Springer International Publishing AG, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57526-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doerner, D., (2008). Umgang mit Komplexität, in: von Gleich, A., Goeßling-Reisemann, S., (2008). Industrial Ecology. Erfolgreiche Wege zu nachhaltigen industriellen Systemen, Vieweg+Teubner Verlag Wiesbaden, ISBN: 978-3-8351-0185-2Google Scholar
Fridgeirsson, T. V./ Kristjansdottir, B. H./ Ingason, H., (2021). An Alternative Risk Assessment Routine for Decision Making; Towards a VUCA Meter to Assess the Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity and Ambiguity of Complex Projects in: Cuevas, R./ Bodea, C.-N./Torres-Lima, P., (2021). Research on Project, Programme and Portfolio Management. Integrating Sustainability into Project Management, Springer Nature Switzerland AG, ISBN (ebook): 978-3-030-60139-3Google Scholar
Funke, J., (2012). Complex problem solving in: Seel, N.M. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning pp. 682–685, Springer Heidelberg, ISBN: 978-1-4419-1427-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberfellner, R./ de Weck, O./ Fricke, E./ Voessner, S., (2019). Systems Engineering. Fundamentals and Applications, Springer Nature Switzerland AG, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13431-0_1Google Scholar
Hevner, A.R./ March, S.T./ Park, J./Ram, S., (2004). Design science in information systems research, MIS Quarterly, 28(1), pp. 75–105, https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohl, P./ Kluender, J./ van Bennekum, A./ Lockard, R./ Gifford, J./ Muench, J./ Stupperich, M. / Schneider, K., (2018). Back to the future: origins and directions of the 'Agile Manifesto'–views of the originators. Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development, 6(1), pp. 1–27, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40411-018-0059-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
INCOSE, 2022., https://www.incose.org/about-systems-engineering/system-and-se-definition/systems-engineering-definition, dated 2022-11-06Google Scholar
Jarratt, T./ Eckert, C./ Clarkson, J., (2003). A taxonomy of change. Technical Report CUED/C-EDC/TR123, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kreimeyer, M. /Lindemann, U., (2011). Complexity Metrics in Engineering Design. Managing the Structure of Design Processes, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20963-5Google Scholar
Krishnan, V./ Bhattacharya, S., (2002). Technology Selection and Commitment in New Product Development: The Role of Uncertainty and Design Flexibility, Management Science Informs, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 313–327, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.3.313.7728Google Scholar
Kuechler, B./ Vaishnavi, V., (2008). On theory development in design science research: anatomy of a research project, European Journal of Information Systems, 17:5, pp. 489–504, https://dx.doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuster, J./ Huber, E./Lippmann, R./ Schmid, A./ Schneider, E/ Witschi, U. / Wüst, R., (2015). Project Management Handbook, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45373-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennartsson, V./ Sadia, J., (2020). Big Data and Machine Learning. Strategic Decisions in a VUCA World, Lund University, Department of Economics. Strategy Thinking BUSQ01 – Autumn semester 2020. Strategic Thinking - Thesis, p 1, http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9040695Google Scholar
Lindemann, U./ Maurer, M./ Braun, T., (2009). Structural Complexity Management. An Approach for the Field of Product Design, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, e-ISBN: 978-3-540-87889-6Google Scholar
Mack, O./Khare, A., (2016) Perspectives on a VUCA World in: Mack, O./Khare, A./Kraemer, A./ Burgartz, T., (2016). Managing in a VUCA world, Springer International, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16889-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meri, M., (2021). The VUCA Method for Leadership & Management in Times of Crisis – Ex. Covid-19. (Adaptation, performance, and development). Society for Science and Education (United Kingdom),https://dx.doi.org/10.14738/eb.167.2021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muenzel, K./ Boon, W./ Frenken, K./ Vaskelainen, T., (2017). Carsharing business models in Germany: characteristics, success and future prospects, Information Systems and e-Business Management volume 16, pp. 271–291, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-017-0355-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nangia, M./ Mohsin, F. Dr., (2020). Revisiting talent management practices in a pandemic driven VUCA environment – A Qualitative Investigation in the Indian IT Industry, Journal of Critical Reviews, http://dx.doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.07.170Google Scholar
Petersen, K./Feldt, R./ Mujtaba, S./Mattsson, M., (2008). Systematic Mapping Studies in SE, In Proc. 12th EASE, http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/ewic/EASE2008.8Google Scholar
Project Management Institute, Inc., (2021). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. PMBOK® Guide. And Standard for Project Management, 7th Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Newtown Square, Pennsylvania (USA), ISBN: 978-1-62825-644-2Google Scholar
Project Management Institute, Inc., (2014). Navigating Complexity: A Practice Guide, Project Management Institute, Inc., Newtown Square, Pennsylvania (USA), ISBN: 978-1-62825-036-7Google Scholar
Schmidt, T./ Guaragni, F./ Paetzold, K., (2016). Demerging agility, leanness, flexibility, reconfigurability and changeability: Towards a clear distinction, 2016 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation/IEEE lnternational Technology Management Conference (ICE/ITMC), 2016, pp. 1–11, https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICE/ITMC39735.2016.9026110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwaber, K./Sutherland, J., (2020). The Scrum Guide. The Definitive Guide to Scrum: The Rules of the, https://scrumguides.org/docs/scrumguide/v2020/2020-Scrum-Guide-US.pdf, dated 2022-11-06Google Scholar
Storbjerg, S. H./ Brunoe, T.D./ Nielsen, K., (2019). Engineering Change Management and Transition Towards Mass Customization in: Bellemare, J./ Carrier, S./ Dr. Nielsen, K./ Piller, F.T., (2019). Managing Complexity. Proceedings of the 8th World Conference on Mass Customization, Personalization, and Co-Creation (MCPC 2015), Montreal, Canada, October 20th–22th, 2015, corrected publication 2019, Springer International Publishing AG Switzerland, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29058-4Google Scholar
Tolk, A./ Adams, K. M./ Keating, C. B., (2011). Towards Intelligence-Based Systems Engineering and System of Systems Engineering in: Tolk, A./ Jain, L. C., (2011). Intelligence-Based Systems Engineering, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17931-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winzer, P., (2016). Generic Systems Engineering Ein methodischer Ansatz zur Komplexitätsbewältigung, 2nd Edition, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, ISBN: 978-3-662-52893-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar