Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:57:08.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Success Factors for the Validation of Requirements for New Product Generations – A Case Study on Using Field Gathered Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

S. Wagenmann ,
N. Bursac ,
S. Rapp  and
A. Albers
S. Wagenmann*
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
N. Bursac
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
S. Rapp
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
A. Albers
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
*
[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper investigates which activities and success factors can be identified for the data-driven validation of functional requirements. For this purpose, a case study is conducted at a machine tool manufacturer. To validate functional requirements by analyzing data of reference products, these activities must be performed iteratively: basic work, interdisciplinary work, programming and check results. For the successful execution of data-driven validation, the success factors: data origin, acceptance, data quality, knowledge about data and combination of domain knowledge must be considered.

Keywords

industry 4.0digital twinproduct generation engineering (PGE)decision makinginternet of things (IoT)
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 2: DESIGN2022 , May 2022 , pp. 1805 - 1814
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Alber, Albers; Rapp, S.; Birk, C.; Bursac, Nikola (2017): Die Frühe Phase der PGE - Produktgenerationsentwicklung. In Binz, Hansgeorg, Bertsche, Bernd, Bauer, Wilhelm, Spath, Dieter, Roth, Daniel (Eds.): Stuttgarter Symposium für Produktentwicklung: Fraunhofer IAO.Google Scholar
Albers, A.; Rapp, S.; Fahl, J.; Hirschter, T.; Revfi, S.; Schulz, M. et al. . (2020): PROPOSING A GENERALIZED DESCRIPTION OF VARIATIONS IN DIFFERENT TYPES OF SYSTEMS BY THE MODEL OF PGE. In Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference 1, pp. 2235–2244. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.315.Google Scholar
Albers, Albert; Braun, Andreas (2011): A generalised framework to compass and to support complex product engineering processes. In IJPD 15 (1/2/3), pp. 6–25. https://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJPD.2011.043659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albers, Albert; Bursac, Nikola; Wintergerst, Eike (2015): Produktgenerationsentwicklung – Bedeutung und Herausforderungen aus einer entwicklungsmethodischen Perspektive. In Binz, Hansgeorg, Bertsche, Bernd, Bauer, Wilhelm, Roth, Daniel (Eds.): Stuttgarter Symposium für Produktentwicklung, SSP 2015: Fraunhofer IAO.Google Scholar
Albers, Albert; Haug, Fabian; Heitger, Nicolas; Fahl, Joshua; Hirschter, Tobias (2019a): Entwicklungsgenerationen zur Steuerung der PGE – Produktgenerationsentwicklung: Von der Bauteil- zur Funktionsorientierung in der Automobilentwicklung. In : Stuttgarter Symposium für Produktentwicklung SSP 2019, Stuttgart, 16. Mai 2019. Hrsg.: H. Binz: Fraunhofer-Institut für Arbeitswirtschaft und Organisation IAO, pp. 253–262.Google Scholar
Albers, Albert; Heimicke, Jonas; Spadinger, Markus; Reiss, Nicolas; Breitschuh, Jan; Richter, Thilo et al. . (2019b): A systematic approach to situation-adequate mechatronic system development by ASD - Agile Systems Design. In Procedia CIRP 84, pp. 1015–1022. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albers, Albert; Rapp, Simon; Peglow, Natalie; Stürmlinger, Tobias; Heimicke, Jonas; Wattenberg, Friedrich; Wessels, Holger (2019c): Variations as Activity Patterns: A Basis for Project Planning in PGE – Product Generation Engineering. In Procedia CIRP 84, pp. 966–972. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albers, Albert; Rapp, Simon; Spadinger, Markus; Richter, Thilo; Birk, Clemens; Marthaler, Florian et al. . (2019d): The Reference System in the Model of PGE: Proposing a Generalized Description of Reference Products and their Interrelations. In Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design 1 (1), pp. 1693–1702. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.175.Google Scholar
Bharadwaj, Neeraj; Noble, Charles (2017): Finding Innovation in Data Rich Environments. In J Prod Innov Manag 34 (5), pp. 560–564. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkhäuser, Benedikt; Pottebaum, Jens; Koch, Rainer (2009): Unterstützung von Einsatzentscheidungen der Feuerwehr auf Basis IT-unterstützter Kräftekoordination. In Informatik 2009 - Im Focus das Leben, pp. 1393–1396.Google Scholar
Blessing, Lucienne T.M.; Chakrabarti, Amaresh: DRM, a Design Research Methodology. London.Google Scholar
Bursac, Nikola (2016): Model Based Systems Engineering zur Unterstützung der Baukastenentwicklung im Kontext der Frühen Phase der Produktgenerationsentwicklung. Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
Bursac, Nikola; Rapp, Simon; Waldeier, Lukas; Wagenmann, Steffen; Albers, Albert; Deiss, Magnus; Hettich, Volker (2021): Anforderungsmanagement in der Agilen Entwicklung Mechatronischer Systeme - ein Widerspruch in sich?, pp. 283–296. https://dx.doi.org/10.25368/2021.28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, A. M. (2003): The art of requirements triage. In Computer 36 (3), pp. 42–49. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MC.2003.1185216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desai, Preyas; Kekre, Sunder; Radhakrishnan, Suresh; Srinivasan, Kannan (2001): Product Differentiation and Commonality in Design: Balancing Revenue and Cost Drivers. In Management Science 47 (1), pp. 37–51. https://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.1.37.10672.Google Scholar
Dumitrescu, Roman; Albers, Albert; Riedel, Oliver; Stark, Rainer; Gausemeier, Jürgen (2021): Engineering in Deutschland – Status quo in Wirtschaft und Wissenschaft. Ein Beitrag zum Advanced Systems Engineering. Edited by acatech - Deutsche Akademie der Technikwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Ebel, Björn (2015): Modellierung von Zielsystemen in der interdisziplinären Produktentstehung = Modeling of System of Objectives in Interdisciplinary Product Engineering. Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
Hinterhuber, Hans (1993): Paradigmenwechsel. Vom Denken in Funktionen zum Denken in Prozessen. In : Journal der Betriebswirtschaft, pp. 58–75.Google Scholar
IEEE (1998): IEEE Recommended Practice for Software Requirements Specifications. s.l.: IEEE / Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Incorporated.Google Scholar
Klein, Dominik; Tran-Gia, Phuoc; Hartmann, Matthias (2013): Big Data. In Informatik Spektrum 36 (3), pp. 319–323. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00287-013-0702-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Sophia B.; Palen, Leysia (2009): Spatiotemporal mashups: A survey of current tools to inform next generation crisis support. In ISCRAM 2009 – 6th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management.Google Scholar
Maalej, Walid; Nayebi, Maleknaz; Johann, Timo; Ruhe, Guenther (2016): Toward Data-Driven Requirements Engineering. In IEEE Softw. 33 (1), pp. 48–54. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MS.2015.153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, Nils Brede; Aurum, Aybüke; Dybå, Tore (2012): Challenges of shared decision-making: A multiple case study of agile software development. In Information and Software Technology 54 (8), pp. 853–865. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2011.11.006.Google Scholar
Mosavi, Amir; Vaezipour, A. (2013): Developing Effective Tools for Predictive Analytics and Informed Decisions. In Technical Report 2013, University of Tallinn.Google Scholar
Nayebi, Maleknaz; Ruhe, Guenther (2015): Analytical Product Release Planning. In : The Art and Science of Analyzing Software Data: Elsevier, pp. 555–589.Google Scholar
Pagano, Dennis; Maalej, Walid (2013): User feedback in the appstore: An empirical study. In : 2013 21st IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 15.07.2013 - 19.07.2013: IEEE, pp. 125–134.Google Scholar
Russom, Philip (2011): Big Data Analytics. Edited by TDWI Research - Best Practices Report.Google Scholar
Shmueli; Koppius (2011): Predictive Analytics in Information Systems Research. In MIS Quarterly 35 (3), p. 553. https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/23042796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Lamsweerde, A. (2000): Goal-oriented requirements engineering: a guided tour. In : Proceedings Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering. Toronto, Ont., Canada, 27-31 Aug. 2001: IEEE Comput. Soc, pp. 249–262.Google Scholar
Wu, Xindong; Zhu, Xingquan; Wu, Gong-Qing; Ding, Wei (2014): Data mining with big data. In IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 26 (1), pp. 97–107. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2013.109.Google Scholar
Zakir, Jasmine (2015): Big Data Analytics, pp. 81–90. https://dx.doi.org/10.48009/2_iis_2015_81-90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar