No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
SOCIAL EARPLUGS: A CASE STUDY ON INTEGRATING HUMAN AUGMENTATION IN HEARING PROTECTION
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 June 2023
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Social augmentation refers to a human-computer integration technology that aims to enhance the user's social skills by supporting empathy, interaction and communication. This study investigated the implementation of social augmentation in hearing protection within the context of entertainment. Through a user-centred analysis, potential social augmentation functions for earplugs were conceived. Three innovative conceptual prototypes were then developed, each enriched with three social functions. Accordingly, each of these concepts should ensure that social skill is enhanced, facilitated or improved. To assess whether the concepts were successful, the social impact of the prototypes on the user and bystanders was evaluated and compared through questionnaires and focus groups using video footage. The results provided promising conclusions regarding the applied methodology and the potential for optimizing the iteration process of innovative human augmentation concepts.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Beach, E. F., Williams, W., & Gilliver, M. (2012). A qualitative study of earplug use as a health behavior: The role of noise injury symptoms, self-efficacy and an affinity for music. Journal of Health Psychology, 17(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105311412839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Boeck, M., & Vaes, K. (2021). Structuring Human Augmentation Within Product Design. International Conference of Engineering Design (ICED), AUGUST. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaver, W. (2012). What should we expect from research through design? Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 937–946. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godin, D., & Zahedi, M. (2014). Aspects of Research through Design: A Literature Review. In A. Lim, Y., Niedderer, K., Redström, J., Stolterman, E. and Valtonen, (Ed.), DRS international conference 2014 (pp. 1–14). Design Research Society.Google Scholar
Guerrero, G., da Silva, F. J. M., Fernández-Caballero, A., & Pereira, A. (2022). Augmented Humanity: A Systematic Mapping Review. Sensors, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22020514CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, N. (2016). The WEAR Scale: Developing a measure of the social acceptability of a wearable device [Iowa State University]. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J., Kim, E., Yu, J., Kim, J., & Woontack, W. (2018). Holistic quantified self framework for augmented human. HCII - Human-Computer Interactions International Conference, 188–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91131-1Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access