Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-2jptb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-17T19:43:21.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SEMANTIC NETWORKS FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN: A SURVEY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Ji Han ,
Serhad Sarica ,
Feng Shi  and
Jianxi Luo
Ji Han*
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool;
Serhad Sarica
Affiliation:
Singapore University of Technology and Design;
Feng Shi
Affiliation:
Amazon Web Services
Jianxi Luo
Affiliation:
Singapore University of Technology and Design;
*
Han, Ji, University of Liverpool, Industrial Design, United Kingdom, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There have been growing uses of semantic networks in the past decade, such as leveraging large-scale pre-trained graph knowledge databases for various natural language processing (NLP) tasks in engineering design research. Therefore, the paper provides a survey of the research that has employed semantic networks in the engineering design research community. The survey reveals that engineering design researchers have primarily relied on WordNet, ConceptNet, and other common-sense semantic network databases trained on non-engineering data sources to develop methods or tools for engineering design. Meanwhile, there are emerging efforts to mine large scale technical publication and patent databases to construct engineering-contextualized semantic network databases, e.g., B-Link and TechNet, to support NLP in engineering design. On this basis, we recommend future research directions for the construction and applications of engineering-related semantic networks in engineering design research and practice.

Keywords

Semantic data processingKnowledge managementDesign informaticsSemantic networkKnowledge base
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 2621 - 2630
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Acharya, S. and Chakrabarti, A. (2020), “A conceptual tool for environmentally benign design: development and evaluation of a “proof of concept””, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol. 34 No.1, pp. 30-44. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060419000313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, S., Kim, S. and Wallace, K.M. (2006), “A Methodology for Creating Ontologies for Engineering Design”, Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 132-140. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.2720879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnarsson, I. Ö., Frost, O., Gustavsson, E., Stenholm, D., Jirstrand, M. and Malmqvist, J. (2019), “Supporting Knowledge Re-Use with Effective Searches of Related Engineering Documents - A Comparison of Search Engine and Natural Language Processing-Based Algorithms,” Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 2597–2606.Google Scholar
Bertola, P. and Teixeira, J.C. (2003), “Design as a knowledge agent: How design as a knowledge process is embedded into organizations to foster innovation”, Design Studies, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 181-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00036-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boden, M.A. (2004), The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms, 2 ed., London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollacker, K., Evans, C., Paritosh, P., Sturge, T., and Taylor, J. (2008), “Freebase: A Collaboratively Created Graph Database for Structuring Human Knowledge”, Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, AcM, pp. 1247–1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, T.B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G. and, et al. (2020), “Language models are few-shot learners”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14165.Google Scholar
Bryant, C.R., McAdams, D.A., Stone, R.B., Kurtoglu, T. and Campbell, M.I. (2006), “A Validation Study of an Automated Concept Generator Design Tool”, ASME 2006 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, pp. 283–294. http://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2006-99489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camburn, B., He, Y., Raviselvam, S., Luo, J. and Wood, K. (2019), “Evaluating Crowdsourced Design Concepts With Machine Learning”, ASME 2019 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. http://doi.org/10.1115/detc2019-97285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, A., Betteridge, J., Kisiel, B., Settles, B., Hruschka, E.R. and Mitchell, T.M. (2010), “Toward an architecture for never-ending language learning”, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Atlanta, Georgia, AAAI Press, pp. 1306–1313.Google Scholar
Chandrasegaran, S.K., Ramani, K., Sriram, R.D., Horváth, I., Bernard, A., Harik, R.F. and Gao, W. (2013), “The evolution, challenges, and future of knowledge representation in product design systems”, Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 45 No.2, pp. 204-228. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2012.08.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiarello, F., Melluso, N., Bonaccorsi, A. and Fantoni, G. (2019), “A Text Mining Based Map of Engineering Design: Topics and their Trajectories Over Time,” Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 2765–2774. http://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.283.Google Scholar
Chen, L., Wang, P., Dong, H., Shi, F., Han, J., Guo, Y., Childs, P.R.N., Xiao, J. and Wu, C. (2019), “An artificial intelligence based data-driven approach for design ideation”, Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, Vol. 61, pp. 10-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvcir.2019.02.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, T.-J. and Krishnamurthy, V.R. (2020), “Investigating a Mixed-Initiative Workflow for Digital Mind-Mapping”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 142 No.10. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4046808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheong, H., Li, W., Cheung, A., Nogueira, A. and Iorio, F. (2017), “Automated Extraction of Function Knowledge From Text”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 139 No. 11, p. 111407. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K. and Toutanova, K. (2018), “Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805.Google Scholar
Dong, X., Gabrilovich, E., Heitz, G., Horn, W., Lao, N., Murphy, K., Strohmann, T., Sun, S. and Zhang, W. (2014), “Knowledge vault: a web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion”, Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, New York, New York, USA, Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 601–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgiev, G.V. and Georgiev, D.D. (2018), “Enhancing user creativity: Semantic measures for idea generation”, Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 151, pp. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.03.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgiev, G.V., Sumitani, N. and Taura, T. (2017), “Methodology for creating new scenes through the use of thematic relations for innovative designs”, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, Vol. 5 No.1-2, pp. 78-94. http://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2015.1119658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gero, J.S. and Kannengiesser, U. (2014), “The Function-Behaviour-Structure Ontology of Design”, An Anthology of Theories and Models of Design, Springer London, London, pp. 263–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glier, M.W., McAdams, D.A. and Linsey, J.S. (2014), “Exploring Automated Text Classification to Improve Keyword Corpus Search Results for Bioinspired Design”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 136 No. 11. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goel, A.K., Vattam, S., Wiltgen, B. and Helms, M. (2012), “Cognitive, collaborative, conceptual and creative — Four characteristics of the next generation of knowledge-based CAD systems: A study in biologically inspired design”, Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 44 No. 10, pp. 879-900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2011.03.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goucher-Lambert, K. and Cagan, J. (2019), “Crowdsourcing inspiration: Using crowd generated inspirational stimuli to support designer ideation”, Design Studies, Vol. 61, pp. 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.01.001Google Scholar
Han, J., Forbes, H., Shi, F., Hao, J. and Schaefer, D. (2020), “A data-driven approach for creative concept generation and evaluation”, Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference. Cambridge University Press, Vol. 1, pp. 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J., Shi, F., Chen, L. and Childs, P.R.N. (2018a), “The Combinator – a computer-based tool for creative idea generation based on a simulation approach”, Design Science, Vol. 4, p. e11. http://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2018.7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J., Shi, F., Chen, L. and Childs, P.R.N. (2018b), “A computational tool for creative idea generation based on analogical reasoning and ontology”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 462-477. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060418000082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Y., Camburn, B., Liu, H., Luo, J., Yang, M., and Wood, K. (2019), “Mining and Representing the Concept Space of Existing Ideas for Directed Ideation”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 141 No.12, p. 121101. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4044399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirtz, J., Stone, R.B., McAdams, D.A., Szykman, S. and Wood, K.L. (2002), “A functional basis for engineering design: Reconciling and evolving previous efforts”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 65-82. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-001-0008-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, J. and Ruder, S. (2018), “Universal Language Model Fine-tuning for Text Classification”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.06146Google Scholar
Hu, J., Ma, J., Feng, J.-F. and Peng, Y.-H. (2017), “Research on new creative conceptual design system using adapted case-based reasoning technique”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol. 31 No.1, pp. 16-29. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060416000159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kan, J.W.T. and Gero, J.S. (2018), “Characterizing innovative processes in design spaces through measuring the information entropy of empirical data from protocol studies”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 32-43. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060416000548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lan, Z., Chen, M., Goodman, S., Gimpel, K., Sharma, P. and Soricut, R. (2019), “ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representations”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.11942v6Google Scholar
Li, Z. and Ramani, K. (2007), “Ontology-based design information extraction and retrieval”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 137-154. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060407070199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Z., Liu, M., Anderson, D.C. and Ramani, K. (2005), “Semantics-Based Design Knowledge Annotation and Retrieval”, ASME 2005 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, pp. 799-808. http://doi.org/10.1115/detc2005-85107Google Scholar
Li, Z., Raskin, V. and Ramani, K. (2008), “Developing Engineering Ontology for Information Retrieval”, Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, Vol. 8 No. 1, p. 011003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Z., Yang, M.C. and Ramani, K. (2009), “A methodology for engineering ontology acquisition and validation”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 37-51. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060409000092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, S.C.J., Liu, Y. and Lee, W.B. (2010), “Multi-facet product information search and retrieval using semantically annotated product family ontology”, Information Processing & Management, Vol. 46 No. 4, pp. 479-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2009.09.001Google Scholar
Lim, S.C.J., Liu, Y. and Lee, W.B. (2011), “A methodology for building a semantically annotated multi-faceted ontology for product family modelling”, Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 147-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2010.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linsey, J. S., Markman, A. B., and Wood, K. L. (2012), “Design by Analogy: A Study of the WordTree Method for Problem Re-Representation”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 134 No. 4, p. 041009. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4006145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H. and Singh, P. (2004), “ConceptNet — A practical Common-sense reasoning tool-kit”, BT Technology Journal, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 211-226. http://doi.org/10.1023/b:bttj.0000047600.45421.6dCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Q., Wang, K., Li, Y., and Liu, Y. (2020), “Data-Driven Concept Network for Inspiring Designers’ Idea Generation”, Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 20(3): 031004. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4046207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y., Lim, S.C.J. and Lee, W.B. (2013), “Product Family Design Through Ontology-Based Faceted Component Analysis, Selection, and Optimization”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 135 No. 8, p. 081007. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, J., Song, B., Blessing, L. and Wood, K.L. (2018), “Design Opportunity Conception Using Technology Space Map”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol. 32 No.4, pp. 449-461. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060418000094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, J., Sarica, S. and Wood, K.L. (2019), “Computer-Aided Design Ideation Using InnoGPS”, Proceedings of the ASME 2019 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, p. V02AT03A011. http://doi.org/10.1115/detc2019-97587Google Scholar
Luo, J., Sarica, S., and Wood, K. L. (2021), “Guiding data-driven design ideation by knowledge distance”, Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 218, p. 106873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.106873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCaffrey, T. and Spector, L. (2017), “An approach to human–machine collaboration in innovation”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 1-15. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060416000524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G. and Dean, J. (2013), “Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781Google Scholar
Miller, G.A. (1995), “WordNet: a lexical database for English”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 38 No. 11, pp. 39–41. http://doi.org/10.1145/219717.219748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, T., Cohen, W., Hruschka, E., Talukdar, P., Yang, B., Betteridge, J., Carlson, A., Dalvi, B., and, et al. (2018), “Never-ending learning”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 61 No.5, pp. 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjea, S., Bamba, B. and Kankar, P. (2005), “Information retrieval and knowledge discovery utilizing a biomedical patent semantic Web”, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 17 No. 8, pp. 1099-1110. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2005.130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munoz, D. and Tucker, C.S. (2016), “Modeling the Semantic Structure of Textually Derived Learning Content and its Impact on Recipients' Response States”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 138 No. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nomaguchi, Y., Kawahara, T., Shoda, K. and Fujita, K. (2019), “Assessing Concept Novelty Potential with Lexical and Distributional Word Similarity for Innovative Design”, Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 1413–1422.Google Scholar
Otto, K. and Wood, K. (1997), “Conceptual and configuration design of products and assemblies”, ASM Handbook, Materials Selection and Design, Vol. 20, pp. 15-32.Google Scholar
Paulheim, H. (2016), “Knowledge graph refinement: A survey of approaches and evaluation methods”, Semantic Web, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 489–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennington, J., Socher, R. and Manning, C.D. (2014), “Glove: Global vectors for word representation”, in Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP), pp. 1532-1543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, M.E., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K. and Zettlemoyer, L. (2018), “Deep contextualized word representations”, NAACL HLT 2018 - 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies - Proceedings of the Conference, Vol. 1, pp. 2227–2237.Google Scholar
Radford, A., Narasimhan, K., Salimans, T. and Sutskever, I. (2018a), “Improving Language Understanding by Generative Pre-Training”, OpenAI, available at: https://gluebenchmark.com/leaderboard%0Ahttps://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/openai-assets/research-covers/language-unsupervised/language_understanding_paper.pdfGoogle Scholar
Radford, A., Wu, J., Child, R., Luan, D., Amodei, D. and Sutskever, I. (2018b), “Language Models Are Unsupervised Multitask Learners”, OpenAI.Google Scholar
Sarica, S., Song, B., Low, E., and Luo, J. (2019a), “Engineering Knowledge Graph for Keyword Discovery in Patent Search”, Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 2249–2258. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.231Google Scholar
Sarica, S., Song, B., Luo, J., and Wood, K. (2019b), “Technology Knowledge Graph for Design Exploration: Application to Designing the Future of Flying Cars”, Proceedings of the ASME 2019 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, p. V001T02A028. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2019-97605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarica, S., Luo, J. and Wood, K.L. (2020), “TechNet: Technology semantic network based on patent data”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 142, p. 112995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarica, S., Song, B., Luo, J., and Wood, K. L. (2021), “Idea generation with Technology Semantic Network”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060421000020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, F., Chen, L., Han, J. and Childs, P. (2017), “A Data-Driven Text Mining and Semantic Network Analysis for Design Information Retrieval”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 139 No. 11, p. 111402. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddharth, L. and Chakrabarti, A. (2018), “Evaluating the impact of Idea-Inspire 4.0 on analogical transfer of concepts”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 431-448. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060418000136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sowa, J.F. (1992), “Semantic networks” in Shapiro, S. C., ed., Encyclopaedia of artificial intelligence, 2 ed., New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1493–1511.Google Scholar
Speer, R., Chin, J. and Havasi, C. (2017), “ConceptNet 5.5: an open multilingual graph of general knowledge”, Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, California, USA, 3298212: AAAI Press, pp. 4444-4451.Google Scholar
Suchanek, F.M., Kasneci, G. and Weikum, G. (2007), “Yago: a core of semantic knowledge”, Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, Banff, Alberta, Canada, Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 697–706. http://doi.org/10.1145/1242572.1242667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Z., Dai, Z., Yang, Y. and Carbonell, J. (2019), “XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.08237Google Scholar
Yoon, J., Park, H., Seo, W., Lee, J.-M., Coh, B.-y. and Kim, J. (2015), “Technology opportunity discovery (TOD) from existing technologies and products: A function-based TOD framework”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 100, pp. 153-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.04.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, S.-T.D. and Hsieh, P.-K. (2015), “Using association reasoning tool to achieve semantic reframing of service design insight discovery”, Design Studies, Vol. 40, pp. 143-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.07.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaveri, A., Rula, A., Maurino, A., Pietrobon, R., Lehmann, J. and Auer, S. (2016), “Quality assessment for Linked Data: A Survey”, Semantic Web, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 63-93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar