Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T04:21:15.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REVIEW OF DESIGN HEURISTICS AND DESIGN PRINCIPLES IN DESIGN FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Filip Valjak  and
Angelica Lindwall
Filip Valjak*
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb, FSB;
Angelica Lindwall
Affiliation:
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences
*
Valjak, Filip, University of Zagreb, FSB, Department of Design, Croatia, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The advent of additive manufacturing (AM) in recent years have had a significant impact on the design process. Because of new manufacturing technology, a new area of research emerged – Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) with newly developed design support methods and tools. This paper looks into the current status of the field regarding the conceptual design of AM products, with the focus on how literature sources treat design heuristics and design principles in the context of DfAM. To answer the research question, a systematic literature review was conducted. The results are analysed, compared and discussed on three main points: the definition of the design heuristics and the design principles, level of support they provide, as well as where and how they are used inside the design process. The paper highlights the similarities and differences between design heuristics and design principles in the context of DfAM.

Keywords

Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)Additive ManufacturingDesign methods
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 2571 - 2580
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

REFERENCES

Andreasen, M.M., Hansen, C.T. and Cash, P. (2015), Conceptual Design, Springer International Publishing, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19839-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blösch-Paidosh, A., Ahmed-Kristensen, S. and Shea, K. (2019), “Evaluating the Potential of Design for Additive Manufacturing Heuristic Cards to Stimulate Novel Product Redesigns”, Volume 2A: 45th Design Automation Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2019-97865.Google Scholar
Blösch-Paidosh, A. and Shea, K. (2017), “Design heuristics for additive manufacturing”, in Maier, A., Škec, S., Kim, H., Kokkolaras, M., Oehmen, J., Fadel, G., Salustri, F., et al. (Eds.), DS 87-5 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17) Vol 5: Design for X, Design to X, Vancouver, Canada, 21-25.08.2017, The Design Society, Vancuver, Canada, pp. 091–100.Google Scholar
Blösch-Paidosh, A. and Shea, K. (2018), “Preliminary User Study on Design Heuristics for Additive Manufacturing”, Volume 2A: 44th Design Automation Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, p. V02AT03A038; 10 pages.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blösch-Paidosh, A. and Shea, K. (2019), “Design Heuristics for Additive Manufacturing Validated Through a User Study”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 141 No. 4, p. 041101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadegani, A.A., Salehi, H., Yunus, M.M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M. and Ebrahim, N.A. (2013), “A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases”, Asian Social Science, Vol. 9 No. 5, https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n5p18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, Y.T., Chen, C.-H. and Leong, K.F. (2009), “A heuristic-based approach to conceptual design”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, A. (2014), Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper, Fourth Edi., SAGE Publications, Inc., Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Fu, K.K., Yang, M.C. and Wood, K.L. (2016), “Design Principles: Literature Review, Analysis, and Future Directions”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 138 No. 10, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, W., Zhang, Y., Ramanujan, D., Ramani, K., Chen, Y., Williams, C.B., Wang, C.C.L., et al. . (2015), “The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering”, Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 69, pp. 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, I., Rosen, D. and Stucker, B. (2015), Additive Manufacturing Technologies, Springer New York, New York, NY, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3.Google Scholar
Kitchenham, B. and Charters, S. (2007), Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering, Technical Report, Version 2.3 EBSE Technical Report. EBSE 2007-1, Vol. 45, https://doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134500.Google Scholar
Lauff, C.A., Perez, K.B., Camburn, B.A. and Wood, K.L. (2019), “Design Principle Cards: Toolset to Support Innovations With Additive Manufacturing”, Volume 4: 24th Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference; 13th International Conference on Micro- and Nanosystems, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2019-97231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leutenecker-Twelsiek, B., Klahn, C. and Meboldt, M. (2016), “Considering Part Orientation in Design for Additive Manufacturing”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 50, pp. 408–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberati, A., Altman, D.G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P.C., Ioannidis, J.P.A., Clarke, M., et al. . (2009), “The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration”, PLoS Medicine, Vol. 6 No. 7, p. e1000100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindwall, A. and Törlind, P. (2018), “Evaluating design heuristics for additive manufacturing as an explorative workshop method”, in Marjanović, D., Štorga, M., Škec, S., Bojčetić, N. and Pavković, N. (Eds.), DS 92: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference, The Design Society, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp. 1221–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mani, M., Witherell, P. and Jee, H. (2017), “Design Rules for Additive Manufacturing: A Categorization”, Volume 1: 37th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2017-68446.Google Scholar
Mattson, C.A. and Wood, A.E. (2014), “Nine Principles for Design for the Developing World as Derived From the Engineering Literature”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 136 No. 12, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4027984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, D.A. (2003), “Identification and codification of principles for functional tolerance design ”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 355–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J. and Grote, K.-H. (2007), Engineering Design, Springer London, London, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-319-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papalambros, P.Y. (2015), “Design Science: Why, What and How”, Design Science, Vol. 1, p. e1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, A., Linsey, J., Tsenn, J. and Glier, M. (2011), “Identifying Product Scaling Principles: A Step Towards Enhancing Biomimetic Design”, Volume 2: Biomedical and Biotechnology Engineering; Nanoengineering for Medicine and Biology, ASMEDC, pp. 789–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, B., Hilburn, S., Jensen, D. and Wood, K.L. (2019), “Design principle-based stimuli for improving creativity during ideation”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, Vol. 233 No. 2, pp. 493–503.Google Scholar
Perez, K.B., Anderson, D.S., Hölttä-Otto, K. and Wood, K.L. (2015), “Crowdsourced design principles for leveraging the capabilities of additive manufacturing”, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED15), The Design Society, Milan, Italy, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Perez, K.B., Lauff, C.A., Camburn, B.A. and Wood, K.L. (2019), “Design Innovation With Additive Manufacturing: A Methodology”, Volume 7: 31st International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2019-97400.Google Scholar
Pradel, P., Zhu, Z., Bibb, R. and Moultrie, J. (2018a), “Investigation of design for additive manufacturing in professional design practice”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 29 No. 4–5, pp. 165–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pradel, P., Zhu, Z., Bibb, R. and Moultrie, J. (2018b), “A framework for mapping design for additive manufacturing knowledge for industrial and product design”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 29 No. 6, pp. 291–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, D.W. (2014), “Research supporting principles for design for additive manufacturing”, Virtual and Physical Prototyping, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 225–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, F., Watschke, H., Kuschmitz, S. and Vietor, T. (2019), “Goal Oriented Provision of Design Principles for Additive Manufacturing to Support Conceptual Design”, Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 749–758.Google Scholar
Singh, V., Skiles, S.M., Krager, J.E., Wood, K.L., Jensen, D. and Sierakowski, R. (2009), “Innovations in Design Through Transformation: A Fundamental Study of Transformation Principles”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 131 No. 8, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3125205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, R.B., Wood, K.L. and Crawford, R.H. (2000), “A heuristic method for identifying modules for product architectures”, Design Studies, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M.K., Moroni, G., Vaneker, T., Fadel, G., Campbell, R.I., Gibson, I., Bernard, A., et al. . (2016), “Design for Additive Manufacturing: Trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints”, CIRP Annals, Vol. 65 No. 2, pp. 737–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, K. and Eppinger, S. (2007), Product Design and Development, 4th Editio., McGraw-Hill Education, New York.Google Scholar
Valjak, F. and Bojčetić, N. (2019), “Conception of Design Principles for Additive Manufacturing”, Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 689–698.Google Scholar
Valjak, F., Bojčetić, N. and Lukić, M. (2018), “Design for Additive Manufacturing: Mapping of product functions”, in Marjanović, D., Štorga, M., Škec, S., Bojčetić, N. and Pavković, N. (Eds.), DS 92: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference, The Design Society, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp. 1369–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, S., Seifert, C., Daly, S.R. and Gonzalez, R. (2016), “Design Heuristics in Innovative Products”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 138 No. 7, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, S. and Seifert, C.M. (2011), “Creativity through design heuristics: A case study of expert product design”, Design Studies, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 384–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar