Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:21:44.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Product-Service System for Safety Footwear

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

D. J. Janson ,
S. T. Newman  and
V. Dhokia
D. J. Janson*
Affiliation:
University of Bath, United Kingdom
S. T. Newman
Affiliation:
University of Bath, United Kingdom
V. Dhokia
Affiliation:
University of Bath, United Kingdom
*
[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper proposes that safety footwear manufacture shifts towards a sustainable Product-Service System (PSS). The PSS consists of seven stages from identification of requirements through to disposal or replacement. Through this, designers and manufacturers can realise safety footwear that is customised to end user sizing, function, industry and aesthetic requirements. For end users, this PSS leads to the creation of more comfortable and practicable footwear, addressing the underlying level of acceptance of uncomfortable safety footwear, reducing waste and providing sex specific offerings.

Keywords

mass customisationproduct-service systems (PSS)design automationsafety footwear
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 2: DESIGN2022 , May 2022 , pp. 1031 - 1040
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Benjamin, D., Ahram, T., de Ru, E., Choukou, M. A., Abdi, E., Gardan, N., Boyer, F. C., Regnault, P., & Taiar, R. (2017). Comparison of FAP scores with the use of safety footwear and regular walking shoes. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 18(6), 631–642. 10.1080/1463922X.2016.1260180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bespoke & Custom Tailored Shirts Online | iTailor. (n.d.). Retrieved November 20, 2021, from https://www.itailor.co.uk/Google Scholar
Blessing, L. T. M., & Chakrabarti, A. (2009). DRM, a design research methodology. In DRM, a Design Research Methodology. Springer London. 10.1007/978-1-84882-587-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BS EN ISO 20345:2011 Personal protective equipment - Safety footwear, (2014).Google Scholar
Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters. (2005). Manufacturing 20/20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goto, K., & Abe, K. (2017). Gait characteristics in women's safety shoes. Applied Ergonomics, 65, 163–167. 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.06.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janson, D., Newman, S. T., & Dhokia, V. (2021). Safety footwear: A survey of end-users. Applied Ergonomics, 92. 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103333CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mancuso, G., Cavrini, G., Berdondini, R. M., & Mancuso, M. (2017). Skin lesions and other foot problems associated with safety footwear. Giornale Italiano Di Medicina Del Lavoro Ed Ergonomia, 38(4), 261–264. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29916607Google ScholarPubMed
Marr, S. J., & Quine, S. (1993). Shoe concerns and foot problems of wearers of safety footwear. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 43(2), 73–77. http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nike. (2021). Nike By You. https://www.nike.com/gb/en_gb/c/nikeidGoogle Scholar
Ochsmann, E., Noll, U., Ellegast, R., Hermanns, I., & Kraus, T. (2016). Influence of different safety shoes on gait and plantar pressure: a standardized examination of workers in the automotive industry. Journal of Occupational Health, 58(5), 404–412. 10.1539/joh.15-0193-OACrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penin, L. (2018). An Introduction to Service Design: Designing the Invisible. Bloomsberg USA. 10.1080/14606925.2019.1615677Google Scholar
Piller, F. T., Mu¨ller, M., & Mu¨ller, M. (2007). A new marketing approach to mass customisation. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 17(7), 583–593. 10.1080/0951192042000273140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PLH. (2017). Work Boots Aren't Just For Men – Women Need A Great Pair of Safety Footwear Too. PLH Group. https://plhgroupinc.com/womens-safety-footwear/Google Scholar
Shang, X., Shen, Z., Xiong, G., Wang, F. Y., Liu, S., Nyberg, T. R., Wu, H., & Guo, C. (2018). Moving from mass customization to social manufacturing: a footwear industry case study. https://doi-org.ezproxy1.bath.ac.uk/10.1080/0951192X.2018.1550675, 32(2), 194–205. 10.1080/0951192X.2018.1550675Google Scholar
‘Some soles last 1,000 years in landfill’: the truth about the sneaker mountain Fashion The Guardian. (n.d.). Retrieved November 22, 2021, from https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2020/mar/21/some-soles-last-1000-years-in-landfill-the-truth-about-the-sneaker-mountainGoogle Scholar
Stewart, W. F., Ricci, J. A., Chee, E., Hirsch, A. G., & Brandenburg, N. A. (2007). Lost Productive Time and Cost Due to Common Pain Conditions in the US Workforce. Journal of American Medical Association, 49(6), 672–679.Google Scholar
Tsigkas, A. C. (2013). The Lean Enterprise - From the Mass Economy to the Economy of One. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. http://www.springer.com/series/10099Google Scholar
Tukker, A. (2004). Eight types of product-service system: Eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from suspronet. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(4), 246–260. 10.1002/BSE.414Google Scholar
Tukker, A., & Tischner, U. (2006). Note from the field Product-services as a research field: past, present and future. Reflections from a decade of research. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.01.022Google Scholar