Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T15:37:37.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Possession and dispossession: a dual phenomenon in digital artefacts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Pranati Kompella  and
Neelakantan Keshavan
Pranati Kompella*
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, India
Neelakantan Keshavan
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, India
*
[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A modern user's interactions with digital artefacts are a subject of interest to numerous fields of study, including human-computer interaction (HCI). Innovations in HCI necessitate an understanding of users’ attachment to these artefacts. This paper characterises user attachment as a dual phenomenon of possession and dispossession. The findings give deeper insight into the influences of this phenomenon and how they might distinguish its manifestation in physical and virtual environments. Avenues for design interventions were then interpreted from these findings.

Keywords

virtual possessionvirtual dispossessioninteraction designhuman-centred designbehavioural design
Type
Human Behaviour and Design Creativity
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 1005 - 1014
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Bardhi, F. and Eckhardt, G.M. (2012), “Access-based consumption: the case of car sharing”, Journal of Consumer Research. Vol. 39 No.4, pp. 881–898, https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/666376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwayne Ball, A. and Tasaki, L.H. (1992), “The Role and Measurement of Attachment in Consumer Behavior”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 155–172, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(08)80055-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbin, J.M. and Strauss, A., 1990. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative sociology, 13(1), pp.3–21, https://dx.doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-1990-0602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerritsen, D.B., Tasse, D., Olsen, J.K., Vlahovic, T.A., Gulotta, R., Odom, W., Wiese, J. and Zimmerman, J., (2016), “Mailing archived emails as postcards: Probing the value of virtual collections”. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1187–1199, https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, J. (2016), “The Concept of Affordances in Digital Media”, in Friese, H., Rebane, G., Nolden, M. and Schreiter, M. (Eds.), Handbuch Soziale Praktiken Und Digitale Alltagswelten, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, pp. 1–8, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08460-8_67-1.Google Scholar
Kirk, C.P. and Swain, S.D. (2018), “Consumer psychological ownership of digital technology”, Psychological Ownership and Consumer Behavior Springer International Publishing, Cham, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77158-8.Google Scholar
Kirk, C.P., Swain, S.D. and Gaskin, J.E. (2016), “I'm Proud of It: Consumer Technology Appropriation and Psychological Ownership”, in Obal, M.W., Krey, N. and Bushardt, C. (Eds.), Let's Get Engaged! Crossing the Threshold of Marketing's Engagement Era, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 643–645, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11815-4_199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleine, S. S., & Baker, S. M. (2004). An integrative review of material possession attachment. Academy of marketing science review, Vol. 1 No. 1 pp. 1–39.Google Scholar
Law, E.L.-C., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M. and Vemeeren, A. (2009), “Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach”. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 719–728), https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meschtscherjakov, A., Wilfinger, D. and Tscheligi, M. (2014), “Mobile attachment causes and consequences for emotional bonding with mobile phones”, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2317–2326, https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odom, W., Pierce, J., Stolterman, E. and Blevis, E. (2009), “Understanding why we preserve some things and discard others in the context of interaction design”, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1053–1062, https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odom, W., Zimmerman, J. and Forlizzi, J. (2010), “Virtual possessions”, Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, pp. 368–371, https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odom, W., Zimmerman, J. and Forlizzi, J. (2011), “Teenagers and their virtual possessions: design opportunities and issues”, In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1491–1500, https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odom, W., Zimmerman, J. and Forlizzi, J. (2014), “Placelessness, spacelessness, and formlessness: experiential qualities of virtual possessions”, Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, pp. 985–994, https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odom, W., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., López Higuera, A., Marchitto, M., Cañas, J., Lim, Y., et al. (2013), “Fragmentation and transition: understanding perceptions of virtual possessions among young adults in Spain, South Korea and the United States”, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1833–1842, https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyedele, Y., Greunen, D. and Veldsman, A., 2018, August. UX engagement and interaction. In 2018 7th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO) (pp. 792–798). IEEE, https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icrito.2018.8748639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, J. and Paulos, E. (2011), “Second-hand interactions: investigating reacquisition and dispossession practices around domestic objects”, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2385–2394, https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roster, C.A. (2001), “Letting go: the process and meaning of dispossession in the lives of consumers”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 425–430.Google Scholar
Schifferstein, H.N.J. and Zwartkruis-Pelgrim, E.P.H. (2008), “Consumer-Product Attachment: Measurement and design implications”, International Journal of Design. Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Turner, P. and Turner, S. (2011), “My Grandfather's iPod: An investigation of emotional attachment to digital and non-digital artefacts”. In proceedings of the 29th annual European conference on cognitive ergonomics (pp. 149–156). https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2074712.2074742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, P. and Turner, S. (2013), “Emotional and aesthetic attachment to digital artefacts”, Cognition, Technology & Work, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 403–414, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10111-012-0231-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
University of Liechtenstein, Seidel, S., Recker, J., Queensland University of Technology, Vom Brocke, J., and University of Liechtenstein. (2013), “Sensemaking and Sustainable Practicing: Functional Affordances of Information Systems in Green Transformations”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 37 No. 4, pp. 1275–1299, https://dx.doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.4.13.Google Scholar
Watkins, R., Denegeri-Knott, J. and Molesworth, M. (2016), “The relationship between ownership and possession: observations from the context of digital virtual goods”, Journal of Marketing Management. Vol. 32. No. 1-2, pp. 44–70. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2015.1089308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, U. and Schuster, C. (2019), I Own, Therefore I Am? The Role of Material Possession for Consumers’ Selfperception and Attitude towards Non-Ownership Consumption Modes, preprint, PsyArXiv, 14 November, https://dx.doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xew85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, R.K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. 5th ed, Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, https://dx.doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v14i1.73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar