Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:44:22.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE POSITIVE IMPACT OF AGILE RETROSPECTIVES ON THE COLLABORATION OF DISTRIBUTED DEVELOPMENT TEAMS – A PRACTICAL APPROACH ON THE EXAMPLE OF BOSCH ENGINEERING GMBH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Katharina Duehr ,
Pauline Efremov ,
Jonas Heimicke ,
Emilie Maria Teitz ,
Ferdinand Ort ,
Marion Weissenberger-Eibl  and
Albert Albers
Katharina Duehr*
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT);
Pauline Efremov
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT);
Jonas Heimicke
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT);
Emilie Maria Teitz
Affiliation:
Bosch Engineering GmbH
Ferdinand Ort
Affiliation:
Bosch Engineering GmbH
Marion Weissenberger-Eibl
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT);
Albert Albers
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT);
*
Duehr, Katharina, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) IPEK Institute of Product Engineering Germany, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

To counteract competitive pressure, increasing customer requirements and growing product complexity successful distributed collaboration in product development is vital. Companies have to face new challenges, such as efficiency losses in communication. To overcome these challenges agile working practices, such as agile retrospectives, could be beneficial. The objective of this scientific work is to evaluate the benefit of agile working practices on the example of agile retrospectives, for the improvement of collaboration in distributed development teams. Based on literature analysis, qualitative and quantitative expert interviews following the DRM by Blessing and Chakrabarti, this scientific work shows that agile working practices have a high potential to improve distributed collaboration. To address this potential, several virtual agile retrospectives are developed and conducted within a distributed team at Bosch Engineering GmbH. The evaluation of this approach results in a high potential of agile retrospectives indicating an improvement tendency. Especially iteratively implemented virtual agile retrospectives have a positive impact on successful distributed collaboration.

Keywords

Collaborative designNew product developmentTeamworkagile working practicesdistributed collaboration
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 3071 - 3080
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Abrahamsson, Pekka (2002): Agile software development methods. Review and analysis. Espoo: VTT (VTT publications, 478). Available online at https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.08439.Google Scholar
Albers, A.; Burkhardt, N.; Meboldt, M.; Saak, M. (2005): SPALTEN Problem Solving Methodology in the Product Development. In: Engineering Design and the Global Economy: 15th International Conference on Engineering Design - ICED 2005, Melbourne, 15. - 18. August 2005. Hrsg.: A. Samuel: The Design Society, Melbourne, p. 90671.Google Scholar
Albers, Albert; Heimicke, Jonas; Spadinger, Markus; Reiss, Nicolas; Breitschuh, Jan; Richter, Thilo et al. (2019): A systematic approach to situation-adequate mechatronic system development by ASD - Agile Systems Design.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albers, Albert; Weissenberger-Eibl, Marion A.; Duehr, Katharina; Zech, Katharina; Seus, Fanny (2020): Literature-based identification of success-relevant influencing factors of distributed product development. In 30th CIRP Design 2020 (CIRP Design 2020).Google Scholar
Atzberger, Alexander; Nicklas, Simon J.; Schrof, Julian; Weiss, Stefan; Paetzold, Kristin (2020): Agile Entwicklung physischer Produkte. Eine Studie zum aktuellen Stand in der industriellen Praxis. Neubiberg: Universitätsbibliothek der Universität der Bundeswehr München.Google Scholar
Beck, K.; Beedle, M.; van Bennekum, A.; Cockburn, A.; Cunningham, W.; Fowler, M. et al. (2001): Agile Manifesto. Available online at https://agilemanifesto.org/, checked on 10/13/2020.Google Scholar
Blessing, Lucienne T.M.; Chakrabarti, Amaresh (2009): DRM, a Design Research Methodology. London: Springer London. Available online at http://site.ebrary.com/lib/alltitles/docDetail.action?docID=10310350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. (1994): Perspective third-generation new product processes. In J Product Innovation Man 11 (1), pp. 3–14. DOI: 10.1016/0737-6782(94)90115-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derby, Esther; Larsen, Diana (2012): Agile retrospectives. Making good teams great. Bookversion: P7.0. Dallas, Texas, Raleigh, North Carolina: The Pragmatic Bookshelf (The pragmatic programmers).Google Scholar
Duehr, K.; Hirsch, M.; Albers, A.; Bursac, N. (2020): A methodology to identify and address improvement potentials in communication processes of distributed product development – an initial approach. In Proc. Des. Soc.: Des. Conf. 1, pp. 541–550. DOI: 10.1017/dsd.2020.35.Google Scholar
Duehr, Katharina; Heimicke, Jonas; Breitschuh, Jan; Spadinger, Markus; Kopp, David; Haertenstein, Lars; Albers, Albert (2019): Understanding Distributed Product Engineering: Dealing with Complexity for Situation- and Demand-Oriented Process Design. In Procedia CIRP 84, pp. 136–142. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlenspiel, Klaus (1995): Integrierte Produktentwicklung. Methoden für Prozeßorganisation, Produkterstellung und Konstruktion. München: Hanser.Google Scholar
Gaul, Hans-Dieter (2001): Verteilte Produktentwicklung. Perspektiven und Modell zur Optimierung. Zugl.: München, Techn. Univ., Diss., 2001. 1. Aufl. München: Hut (Produktentwicklung).Google Scholar
Gierhardt, Heiko (2001): Global verteilte Produktentwicklungsprojekte. Dissertation. Technische Universität München, München.Google Scholar
Goevert, Kristin; Heimicke, Jonas; Lindemann, Udo; Albers, Albert (2019): Interview Study on the Agile Development of Mechatronic Systems. In Proc. Int. Conf. Eng. Des . 1 (1), pp. 2287–2296. DOI: 10.1017/dsi.2019.235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grieb, Jöran Christopher (2008): Auswahl von Werkzeugen und Methoden für verteilte Produktentwicklungsprozesse. Zugl.: München, Techn. Univ., Diss., 2007. 1. Aufl. München: Dr. Hut (Produktentwicklung).Google Scholar
Hinds, Pamela; Kiesler, Sara (2002): Distributed work. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Available online at http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=70964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hossain, Emam; Babar, Muhammad Ali; Paik, Hye-young (2009): Using Scrum in Global Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review. In 4th IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering, pp. 175–184. DOI: 10.1109/ICGSE.2009.25.Google Scholar
Keating, Charles; Rogers, Ralph; Unal, Resit; Dryer, David; Sousa-Poza, Andres; Safford, Robert et al. (2003): System of Systems Engineering. In Engineering Management Journal 15 (3), pp. 36–45. DOI: 10.1080/10429247.2003.11415214.Google Scholar
Kern, Eva-Maria (2005): Verteilte Produktentwicklung - Rahmenkonzept und Vorgehensweise zur organisatorischen Gestaltung. Zugl.: Hamburg, Techn. Univ., Habil.-Schr., 2005. Berlin: GITO Verl. für industrielle Informationstechnik und Organisation.Google Scholar
Krause, F. L.; Jansen, H.; Kiesewetter, T. (1996): Verteilte, kooperative Produktentwicklung durch Integration heterogener CAD-Systeme in eine multimediale Breitbandkommunikationsumgebung, Distributed, cooperative product development, ZWF Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb. In ZWF Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 91 (4), pp. 147–151. Available online at https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tema%3ATEMAM96050492683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, Andreas; Törlind, Peter; Karlsson, Lennart; Mabogunje, Ade; Leifer, Larry; Larsson, Tobias; Elfstrm, Bengt-Olof (2003): Distributed team innovation - a framework for distributed product development, pp. 321–322.Google Scholar
Leon, Martinez, Hilda, C.; Farris, Jennifer A.; Letens, Geert (2013): Improving Product Development Performance Through Iteration Front-Loading. In IEEE Trans . Eng. Manage . 60 (3), pp. 552–565. DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2012.2228205.Google Scholar
Nuhn, H. F.; Martini, J.-P; Kostron, A. (2016): Hybride Strukturen in der Automobilindustrie - Studie zu Agilen Praktiken in Forschungs- und Entwicklungsprozessen. In Engstler, M., Fazal-Baqaie, M., Hanser, E., Linssen, O., Mikusz, M. & Volland, A. (Hrsg.), Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V., pp. 29–36.Google Scholar
Ostergaard, Karen J.; Summers, Joshua D. (2009): Development of a systematic classification and taxonomy of collaborative design activities. In Journal of Engineering Design 20 (1), pp. 57–81. DOI: 10.1080/09544820701499654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, Kai; Wohlin, Claes (2010): The effect of moving from a plan-driven to an incremental software development approach with agile practices. In Empir Software Eng 15 (6), pp. 654–693. DOI: 10.1007/s10664-010-9136-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Tobias; Weiss, Stefan; Paetzold, Kristin (2018): VDI-Statusreport Agile Entwicklung physischer Produkte.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Tobias Sebastian; Paetzold, Kristin (2016): Agilität als Alternative zu traditionellen Standards in der Entwicklung physischer Produkte: Chancen und Herausforderungen. In Krause, Dieter, Paetzold, Kristin, Wartzack, Sandro (Eds.): Design for X - Beiträge zum 27. DfX-Symposium Oktober 2016. Hamburg: TuTech Verlag TuTech Innovation GmbH, pp. 255–267.Google Scholar
Seus, Fanny; Eibl, Weissenberger, Marion, A.; Zern Breuer, Rubina (2020): Considering representational gaps - how subsidiaries' relationship affects multi-location project management. In IJPOM 12 (4), p. 321. DOI: 10.1504/IJPOM.2020.10033026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, Anita Friis; Hedegaard, Christian; Dukovska-Popovska, Iskra; Steger-Jensen, Kenn (2015): Improved Product Development Performance through Agile/Stage-Gate Hybrids: The Next-Generation Stage-Gate Process? In Research-Technology Management 58 (1), pp. 34–45. DOI: 10.5437/08956308X5801236.Google Scholar
Taylor, Frederick Winslow; Roesler, Rudolf (1913): Die Grundsätze wissenschaftlicher Betriebsführung. [Reprint der Ausg. 2013] München, Berlin 1913. Paderborn: Salzwasser-VerlGoogle Scholar