Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T04:21:12.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

NOVICE DESIGNERS' USE OF PARTITIONING STRATEGIES TO NAVIGATE THE PROTOTYPING PROCESS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Camilla Arndt Hansen  and
Michael Deininger
Camilla Arndt Hansen*
Affiliation:
Technical University of Denmark
Michael Deininger
Affiliation:
Technical University of Denmark
*
Hansen, Camilla Arndt, Technical University of Denmark, Mechanical Engineering, Denmark, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Prototypes can be used to create value in all phases of the product development process. Prototyping strategies that determine how prototypes are developed should therefore be considered for the prototyping process as a whole. In this paper, we analyse how partitioning strategies were used by ten novice design teams to navigate their prototyping processes during a three-week mechatronic development project. Using the ‘ProtoMapping’ method, their prototyping strategies were visualized and five different types of strategies identified. Four of the ten teams formally planned how to divide their product into modules that could be prototyped in parallel or planned when to integrate prototypes to test the full product. Still, the ProtoMaps showed that most of the teams used some partitioning strategies during their project even when they did not formally decide to do so. Novice designers should be supported in making such strategies for the prototyping process deliberately. Therefore, prototyping tools should be expanded to support not only individual prototyping activities but also the prototyping process.

Keywords

PrototypingNew product developmentDesign processDesign education
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 2267 - 2276
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Camburn, B.A., Dunlap, B.U., Kuhr, R., Viswanathan, V.K., Linsey, J.S., Jensen, D.D., Crawford, R.H., et al. . (2013), “Methods for Prototyping Strategies in Conceptual Phases of Design: Framework and Experimental Assessment”, Proceedings of ASME IDETC/CIE 2013, presented at the IDETC/CIE, ASME, Portland, Oregon, USA, p. V005T06A033.Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, A. (2002), Engineering Design Synthesis: Understanding, Approaches and Tools, Springer London, London, available at: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3717-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, E.J., Jensen, D.D., Buckley, R.T., Menefee, D.A., Ziegler, K.K., Wood, K.L. and Crawford, R.H. (2012), “Prototyping Strategies: Literature Review and Identification of Critical Variables”, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, San Antonio, TX, United States, p. 25.1091.Google Scholar
Dunlap, B.U., Hamon, C., Camburn, B.A., Crawford, R., Jensen, D.D., Green, M., Otto, K., et al. (2014), “Heuristics-Based Prototyping Strategy Formation: Development and Tesing of a New Prototyping Planning Tool”, Proceedings of the ASME 2014 IMECE, presented at the IMECE 2014.10.1115/IMECE2014-39959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erichsen, J.F., Sjöman, H., Steinert, M. and Welo, T. (2020), “Protobooth: gathering and analyzing data on prototyping in early-stage engineering design projects by digitally capturing physical prototypes”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Hansen, C.A., Jensen, L.S., Özkil, A.G. and Pacheco, N.M.M. (2020), “Fostering Prototyping Mindsets in Novice Designers with the Prototyping Planner”, Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, Vol. 1, presented at the DESIGN 2020, pp. 1725–1734.10.1017/dsd.2020.132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, C.A. and Özkil, A.G. (2020), “From Idea to Production: A Retrospective and Longitudinal Case Study of Prototypes and Prototyping Strategies”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 142 No. 3, p. 031115.10.1115/1.4045385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Küstner, C., Breitsprecher, T. and Wartzack, S. (2013), “Design for noise reduction – The architecture of an engineering assistance system for the development of noise-reduced rotating systems”, DS 75-5: Proceedings of the 19th ICED, Seoul, Korea, pp. 81–90.Google Scholar
Lauff, C., Menold, J. and Wood, K.L. (2019), “Prototyping Canvas: Design Tool for Planning Purposeful Prototypes”, Proceedings of the Design Society: ICED, Vol. 1, pp. 1563–1572.Google Scholar
Lauff, C.A., Kotys-Schwartz, D. and Rentschler, M.E. (2018), “What is a Prototype? What are the Roles of Prototypes in Companies?”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 140 No. 6, p. 061102.10.1115/1.4039340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menold, J., Jablokow, K. and Simpson, T. (2017), “Prototype for X (PFX): A Holistic Framework for Structuring Prototyping Methods to Support Engineering Design”, Design Studies, Vol. 50, pp. 70–112.10.1016/j.destud.2017.03.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, R.E., Jensen, D.D. and Wood, K.L. (2004), “Prototype Partitioning Based on Requirement Flexibility”, presented at the ASME 2004 IDETC-CIE, ASME, pp. 65–77.10.1115/DETC2004-57221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negoescu, F. (2007), “Risk management in prototyping phase”, Annals of Daaam for 2007 and Proceedings of the 18th International Daaam Symposium, DAAAM INT VIENNA, pp. 501–502.Google Scholar
Nelson, J., Berlin, A. and Menold, J. (2019), “ARCHIE: An Automated Data Collection Method for Physical Prototyping Efforts in Authentic Design Situations”, Vol. 7, presented at the ASME 2019 IDETC/CIE, Anaheim, California, USA, available at:https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2019-97444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuh, G., Dölle, C. and Schloesser, S. (2018), “Agile Prototyping for technical systems – Towards an adaption of the Minimum Viable Product principle”, Proceedings of NordDesign, presented at the NordDesign 2018, Linköping, Sweden.Google Scholar
Steinert, M. and Leifer, L.J. (2012), “‘Finding One's Way’: Re-Discovering a Hunter-Gatherer Model based on Wayfaring”, International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 28 No. 2, p. 251.Google Scholar