Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:06:55.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MOTIVATIONS BEHIND ACTORS’ COOPERATION IN CIRCULAR ECOSYSTEMS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW AND A BRAZILIAN CASE STUDY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2023

Sophia Barquete ,
Adriana Hofmann Trevisan ,
Camila Gonçalves Castro  and
Janaina Mascarenhas
Sophia Barquete*
Affiliation:
Department of Production Engineering, São Carlos School of Engineering, University of São Paulo
Adriana Hofmann Trevisan
Affiliation:
Department of Production Engineering, São Carlos School of Engineering, University of São Paulo
Camila Gonçalves Castro
Affiliation:
Department of Production Engineering, São Carlos School of Engineering, University of São Paulo
Janaina Mascarenhas
Affiliation:
Department of Production Engineering, São Carlos School of Engineering, University of São Paulo
*
Barquete, Sophia, University of São Paulo, Brazil, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The circular economy (CE) aims at the cycling of resources through restorative and regenerative strategies. To achieve circularity, coordination of several actors is necessary. The interaction among actors allows the connection between the CE and ecosystem research fields. Although fundamental, the relationships, mainly cooperation, among actors within an ecosystem to foster circularity is not deeply explored in the literature. The objective of this study was to identify the possibilities of cooperation within circular ecosystems, in particular, the motivations that make the actors interact to achieve a CE. A systematic literature review (SLR) and a case study of a Brazilian ecosystem specialized in the recycling of carton packages to manufacture ecological tiles were conducted. The goal was to identify the motivations through the SLR and the case study so the theoretical and the empirical results could be compared. As a result, 28 motivations for actors to engage in ecosystems driven by circularity were identified. In order to achieve a complete and circular solution, actors must be able to clearly understand their roles and relationships so that they can establish new partnerships or reframe those already established.

Keywords

Circular economyCooperationCollaborative designCase studyEcosystems
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 3939 - 3948
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Adner, R. (2017), “Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy”, Journal of Management, SAGE Publications Inc., Vol. 43 No. 1, pp. 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451Google Scholar
Adner, R. and Kapoor, R. (2010), “Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 306–333. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1353582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aminoff, A., Valkokari, K., Antikainen, M. and Kettunen, O. (2017), “Exploring disruptive business model innovation for the circular economy”, Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, Vol. 68, pp. 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57078-5_50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomsma, F. and Brennan, G. (2017), “The Emergence of Circular Economy: A New Framing Around Prolonging Resource Productivity”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Blackwell Publishing, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 603–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bocken, N.M.P., Olivetti, E.A., Cullen, J.M., Potting, J. and Lifset, R. (2017), “Taking the Circularity to the Next Level: A Special Issue on the Circular Economy”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barquete, S., Shimozono, A.H., Trevisan, A.H., Castro, C.G., Gomes, L.A.V. and Mascarenhas, J. (2022). “Exploring the Dynamic of a Circular Ecosystem: A Case Study about Drivers and Barriers” Sustainability, Vol. 14 No. 7875. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasil. Decreto N° 11.043, de 13 de abril de 2022. Available online: https://www.in.gov.br/en/web/dou/-/decreto-n-11.043-de13-de-abril-de-2022-393566799 (accessed on 13 June 2022).Google Scholar
Damha, L.G., Trevisan, A.H., Costa, D.G. and Costa, J.M.H. (2019) ‘How are End-of-Life Strategies Adopted in Product-Service Systems? A Systematic Review of General Cases and Cases of Medical Devices Industry’, in Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED19), Delft, The Netherlands, 5-8 August 2019. DOI:10.1017/dsi.2019.313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, K.M. and Graebner, M.E. (2007), “Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges”. The Academy of Management Review. Vol 50 No. 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888Google Scholar
Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2015), “Towards the Circular Economy: Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition”; Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Vol. 40, pp. 201–205.Google Scholar
Gnyawali, D. R. and Madhavan, R. (2001), “Cooperative Networks and Competitive Dynamics: A Structural Embeddedness Perspective”. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 431. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4845820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, L.A. de V., Facin, A.L.F., Salerno, M.S. and Ikenami, R.K., (2018), “Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier Inc., Vol. 136, pp. 30–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, L.A. de V., de Faria, A.M., Braz, A.C., de Mello, A.M., Borini, F.M. and Ometto, A.R., (2023), “Circular ecosystem management: Orchestrating ecosystem value proposition and configuration”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grodal, S., Anteby, M. and Holm, A.L., (2021), “Achieving rigor in qualitative analysis: The role of active categorization in theory building”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 46 No. 3, pp. 591–612. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.04821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, Y.C., Lin, K.Y., Lu, C. and Rong, K. (2017), “Governing a sustainable business ecosystem in Taiwan's circular economy: The story of spring pool glass”, Sustainability (Switzerland), MDPI, Vol. 9 No. 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iansiti, M. and Levien, R. (2004), “Strategy as ecology”. Harvard Business Review. Vol. 82, pp. 68–78.Google ScholarPubMed
Jacobides, M.G., Cennamo, C. and Gawer, A. (2018), “Towards a theory of ecosystems”, Strategic Management Journal, John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Vol. 39 No. 8, pp. 2255–2276. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3218233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D. and Hekkert, M. (2017), “Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions”. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 127, pp. 221–232. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3037579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konietzko, J., Bocken, N. and Hultink, E.J. (2020), “Circular ecosystem innovation: An initial set of principles”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobo, A., Trevisan, A., Liu, Q., Yang, M. and Mascarenhas, J., (2022). “Barriers to Transitioning Towards Smart Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review”, In: Scholz, S.G.; Howlett, R. J.; Setchi, R. (eds.), Sustainable design and manufacturing: proceedings of the 8th international conference on sustainable design and manufacturing, Springer, Singapore, pp. 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6128-0_24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, Y., Rong, K., Mangalagiu, D., Thornton, T. F. and Zhu, D. (2018) “Co-evolution between urban sustainability and business ecosystem innovation: Evidence from the sharing mobility sector in Shanghai”. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 188, pp. 942–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marconi, M. and Germani, M. (2017) “An end-of-life oriented framework to support the transition toward circular economy” In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED17), Vol. 5, 21.-25.08.2017.Google Scholar
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A.M. and Saldaña, J. (2014), “Qualitative data analysis: A methods source-book”. 3rd ed. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, USA.Google Scholar
Ministério do Meio Ambiente–Secretaria de Qualidade Ambiental. Plano Nacional de Resíduos Sólidos; Ministério do Meio Ambiente (MMA): Brasília, Brazil, 2022.Google Scholar
Moore, J.F. (1993), “Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition”, Harvard Business Review. Vol. 71, pp. 75–83.Google Scholar
Murray, A., Skene, K. and Haynes, K. (2017), “The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context”, Journal of Business Ethics, Springer Netherlands, Vol. 140 No. 3, pp. 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okorie, O., Salonitis, K., Charnley, F. and Turner, C. (2018) “Digitisation and the Circular Economy: A Review of Current Research and Future Trends”. Energies, Vol. 11 No. 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11113009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parida, V., Burström, T., Visnjic, I. and Wincent, J. (2019) “Orchestrating Industrial Ecosystem in Circular Economy: A Two-Stage Transformation Model for Large Manufacturing Companies”, J. Bus. Res, Vol. 101, pp. . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, C., Scott, S. and Geddes, A. (2019), “Snowball Sampling”, SAGE Research Methods Foundations: New York, NY, USA; p. 2.Google Scholar
Pidun, U., Reeves, M. and Schüssler, M. (2019), “Do you need a business ecosystem?” BCG Henderson Inst. Available online: https://www.bcg.com/en-br/publications/2019/do-you-need-business-ecosystem (accessed on 1 September 2020).Google Scholar
Rosa, P., Sassanelli, C., Urbinati, A., Chiaroni, D. and Terzi, S. (2020), “Assessing relations between Circular Economy and Industry 4.0: a systematic literature review”. International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 58 No. 6, pp. 1662–1687. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1680896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, R., Niero, M., Murdock, K. and Olsen, S. (2018), “Circular economy in corporate sustainability strategies: A review of corporate sustainability reports in the fast-moving consumer goods sector”. Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 27 No. 7, pp. 1005–1022. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ta, A.H., Aarikka-Stenroos, L. and Litovuo, L. (2022), “Customer Experience in Circular Economy: Experiential Dimensions among Consumers of Reused and Recycled Clothes”, Sustainability (Switzerland), MDPI, Vol. 14 No. 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010509.Google Scholar
Tate, W.L., Bals, L., Bals, C. and Foerstl, K. (2019), “Seeing the forest and not the trees: Learning from nature's circular economy”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Elsevier B.V., Vol. 149, pp. 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, L.D.W. and Autio, E. (2020), “Innovation Ecosystems in Management: An Organizing Typology”, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D. and Smart, P. (2003), “Towards a methodology for developing evidence-in-formed management knowledge by means of systematic review”. Br. J. Manag. Vol. 14, pp. 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trevisan, A.H., Castro, C.G., Gomes, L.A.V. and Mascarenhas, J. (2022), “Unlocking the circular ecosystem concept: Evolution, current research, and future directions”, Sustainable Production and Consumption, Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.10.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trevisan, A. H., Zacharias, I. S., Liu, Q., Yang, M. and Mascarenhas, J. (2021a) ‘Circular Economy and Digital Technologies: A Review of the Current Research Streams’, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED21), Gothenburg, Sweden, 16-20 August 2021. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trevisan, A.H., Zacharias, I.S., Castro, C.G. and Mascarenhas, J. (2021b), “Circular economy actions in business ecosystems driven by digital technologies”, Procedia CIRP, Elsevier B. V., Vol. 100, pp. 325–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Türkeli, S., Huang, B., Stasik, A. and Kemp, R. (2019), “Circular economy as a glocal business activity: Mobile phone repair in the Netherlands, Poland and China”. Energies, Vol. 12 No. 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12030498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vosman, L., Coenen, T. B. J., Volker, L. and Visscher, K. (2021) “Exploring the innovation ecosystem concept for a construction industry in transition” Innovation Policy in the Construction Industry: The Netherlands compared with several European countries.Google Scholar
Voss, C.; Tsikriktsis, N.; Frohlich, M. (2002), “Case research in operations management”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570210414329CrossRefGoogle Scholar