Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:55:14.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING SUITABLE COMPONENTS FOR FUNCTIONAL INTEGRATION – FOCUSING ON GEOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Michael P. Voigt ,
Dominik Klaiber ,
Patrick Hommel ,
Daniel Roth ,
Hansgeorg Binz  and
Thomas Vietor
Michael P. Voigt*
Affiliation:
University of Stuttgart
Dominik Klaiber
Affiliation:
Braunschweig University of Technology
Patrick Hommel
Affiliation:
University of Stuttgart
Daniel Roth
Affiliation:
University of Stuttgart
Hansgeorg Binz
Affiliation:
University of Stuttgart
Thomas Vietor
Affiliation:
Braunschweig University of Technology
*
Voigt, Michael P., University of Stuttgart, Institute for Engineering Design and Industrial Design, Germany, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The approach of functional integration has the potential to solve challenges regarding lightweight design and resource efficiency since the number of parts and therefore the weight and needed installation space can be reduced. One important step in developing integrative concepts is the pre-selection of suitable functions or components. Previous methods of pre-selection take various aspects into account. However, pre-selection based on these methods usually requires additional tables and forms, whose preparation and editing quickly becomes time-consuming. At the same time, most of the development engineers are working on CAD models. However, their use in the selection of suitable integration partners is not yet supported sufficiently. The development of more than 80 concepts on five different vehicles has shown that the consideration of geometric properties (position, orientation, size) is effective, as they can be identified with minimal analysis effort while working on CAD. In this paper a four-step procedure is presented how integration partners can be identified directly on the basis of CAD models. A following evaluation with development engineers in practice completes the research.

Keywords

Lightweight designDesign methodsComputer Aided Design (CAD)integration of functiongeometric characteristics
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 2047 - 2056
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Aurisicchio, M., Eng, N., Ortiz Nicolas, J., Childs, P., Bracewell, R. (2011), “On the functions of products”, Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 11), Lyngby/Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 443–455.Google Scholar
Bhardwaj, J., Yadav, A., Chauhan, M. S., & Chauhan, A. S. (2021), “Kano model analysis for enhancing customer satisfaction of an automotive product for Indian market”, Materials Today: Proceedings. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delogu, M., Del Pero, F., Pierini, M., (2016), “Lightweight Design Solutions in the Automotive Field: Environmental Modelling Based on Fuel Reduction Value Applied to Diesel Turbocharged Vehicles”, Sustainability, 8(11), 1167. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8111167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlenspiel, K., Hundal, M. S., Kiewert, A., & Lindemann, U. (2007), “Cost-Efficient Design”. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-34648-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlenspiel, K. and Meerkamm, H. (2017), “Integrierte Produktentwicklung: Denkabläufe, Methodeneinsatz, Zusammenarbeit”, 6th ed., Hanser, München, Wien.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franke, H.-J., Crull, S., Koschorrek, R. and Krusche, T. (2005), “Faszination Karosseriebau - Innovationen für zukünftige Karosseriekonzepte”, in Faszination Karosserie, GZVB Gesamtzentrum für Verkehr, Braunschweig, pp. 13–31.Google Scholar
Gumpinger, T., Jonas, H. and Krause, D. (2009), “New approach for lightweight design: from differential design to integration of function”, Proceedings of ICED 09, 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, Palo Alto, California, USA.Google Scholar
Klaiber, D., Fröhlich, T. and Vietor, T. (2019), “Strategies for function integration in engineering design: from differential design to function adoption”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 84, pp. 599–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köckerling, M. and Gausmeier, J. (2003), “Systematisches Entwickeln der Wirkstruktur mechatronischer Systeme”, HNI-Verlagsschriftenreihe No. 122, pp. 217–229.Google Scholar
Laufer, F., Roth, D. and Binz, H. (2019), “Derivation of criteria for identifying lightweight potential – a literature review”, Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 2677–2686. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.274Google Scholar
Moritz, J., Seidel, A., Braun, B., Brandao, A., Pambaguian, L., Köhler, B., Leyens, C. (2019), “Functional integration approaches via laser powder bed processing”, Journal of Laser Applications, 31, 22319, https://doi.org/10.2351/1.5096097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Blessing, L., Feldhusen, J., Grote, K.-H. and Wallace, K. (Eds.) (2007), “Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach”, 3rd ed., Springer-Verlag London Limited, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-319-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimmler, T.U. and Eppinger, S.D. (1994), “Integration analysis of product decompositions”, Proceedings of the 1994 ASME Design Technical Conferences, Vol. 68, pp. 343–351.Google Scholar
Wagner, C., Ahmels, L., Gramlich, S., Groche, P., Monnerjahn, V., Müller, C., & Roos, M. (2017), “Finding New Opportunities: Technology Push Approach”, Manufacturing integrated design: Sheet metal product and process innovation, pp. 275–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52377-4_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wulf, J. and Schuller, J. (2000), “Entwicklungsmethodik für mechatronische Karosseriesysteme”, in Mechatronik - mechanisch/elektrische Antriebstechnik, VDI-Berichte, VDI, Düsseldorf, pp. 181–198.Google Scholar
Ziebart, J.R. (2012), Ein konstruktionsmethodischer Ansatz zur Funktionsintegration, Dissertation, Institut für Konstruktionstechnik, TU Braunschweig, München.Google Scholar