Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:21:16.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MATERIAL SELECTION AS COOPERATIVE PROCESS: A FRAMEWORK PROPOSAL FOR A CHANGING ECONOMY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Flavia Papile ,
Barbara Del Curto  and
Andrea Coccia
Flavia Papile*
Affiliation:
Design Department of Politecnico di Milano
Barbara Del Curto
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering “Giulio Natta” of Politecnico di Milano
Andrea Coccia
Affiliation:
Innovation Manager at Faber S.p.A
*
Papile, Flavia, Politecnico di Milano, Design, Italy, flavia.papile@;polimi.it

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In current era of Anthropocene, human activities and their consequences on Earth ecosystems are under the lens of scientific research. Researchers in every field of study are trying to find alternatives to promote sustainable development. So it is for design, where researchers exploiting the problem-framing and problem-solving nature of the design discipline itself, trying to find new methodologies and tools to enhance sustainable development.

One of the most important tasks in the design for a sustainable production is focused on material selection. In this paper, authors will present a reflection upon material selection methods and an overview of existing material repositories. Traditionally, material selection is usually attributed to designers or technical professionals but nowadays information concurring in materials selection became a complex task to manage. Therefore, authors propose a case study concerning information management upon materials and their selection presented in a new possible approach: material selection as a collaborative task between several departments of an industrial company, to promote an aware information management activity upon materials.

Keywords

Material selectionDecision makingIndustrial designInformation managementSustainability
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 2017 - 2026
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Akin, F., & Pedgley, O. (2014). “Sample libraries to expedite materials experience for design: A survey of global provision.” Materials and Design, 90, 1207–1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.04.045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allione, C., De Giorgi, C., Lerma, B., & Petruccelli, L. (2012). “From ecodesign products guidelines to materials guidelines for a sustainable product. Qualitative and quantitative multicriteria environmental profile of a material.” Energy, 39(1), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.08.055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allwood, J. M., Ashby, M. F., Gutowski, T. G., & Worrell, E. (2011).” Material efficiency: A white paper.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(3), 362–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allwood, J. M., Ashby, M. F., Gutowski, T. G., & Worrell, E. (2013). “Material efficiency: Providing material services with less material production.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 371. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, M. F., & Bréchet, Y. J. (2003). Designing hybrid materials. Acta materialia, 51(19), 5801–5821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, M., Shercliff, H., & Cebon, D. (2013). “Materials: Engineering, Science, Processing and Design.” 3rd ed. Butterworth-HeinemannGoogle Scholar
Ashby, M. F., & Johnson, K. (2014). “Materials and design: the art and science of material selection in product design.” Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Bilandzic, M., & Venable, J. (2011). “Towards Participatory Action Design Research: Adapting Action Research and Design Science Research Methods for Urban Informatics.” The Journal of Community Informatics, 7(3), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braungart, M., McDonough, W., & Bollinger, A. (2007). “Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emissions - a strategy for eco-effective product and system design.” Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(13-14), 1337–1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.08.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, T. R., Deyst, J. J., Eppinger, S. D., & Whitney, D. E. (2002). Adding value in product development by creating information and reducing risk. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(4), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2002.806710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brundtland, G. H., Khalid, M., Agnelli, S., Al-Athel, S., & Chidzero, WCED. (1987). “Our common future.” Oxford, New York, 8.Google Scholar
Ceschin, F, Gaziulusoy, I. (2016) “Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions”, Design Studies, vol.47 pp.118–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornish, E. H. (1987). “Materials and the designer.” Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crutzen, P. J., and Stoermer, E. F. (2000), “The International Geosphere–Biosphere Programme (IGBP): A Study of Global Change of the International Council for Science (ICSU).” Global Change Newsletter, 41, 17–18.Google Scholar
du Gay, P., Smart Martin, A., Miller, T., & Spyer, P. (1999). Beyond the Pale: Reviewing the Relationship between Material Culture and Design History.Journal of Design History, 12(4), 373–380.Google Scholar
Elkington, J. (1994) Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development. California Management Review, 36, 90–100. http://doi.org/10.2307/41165746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaziulusoy, I., Ryan, C. (2017) “Shifting Conversations for Sustainability Transitions Using Participatory Design Visioning”. Design for Next 12th EAD Conference Sapienza University of Rome 12–14 April 2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahan, A., Ismail, M. Y., Sapuan, S. M., & Mustapha, F. (2010). “Material screening and choosing methods - A review.” Materials and Design, 31(2), 696–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.08.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, P., & Bowes, J. (2017). “Rendering Systems Visible for Design: Synthesis Maps as Constructivist Design Narratives.” She Ji, 3(3), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2017.12.001Google Scholar
Karana, E., Hekkert, P., & Kandachar, P. (2008). “Material considerations in product design: A survey on crucial material aspects used by product designers.” Materials and Design, 29(6), 1081–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karana, E., Hekkert, P., & Kandachar, P. (2010). “A tool for meaning driven materials selection.” Materials & Design, 31(6), 2932–2941. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2009.12.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnan, V., & Ulrich Karl, T. (2001). “Product development decisions: a review of the literature.” Manag, 47(1), 1–21. Retrieved from http://www.ktulrich.com/uploads/6/1/7/1/6171812/pdreview.pdfGoogle Scholar
MacArthur Foundation, E. (2017) “What is a Circular Economy?” Ellen MacArthur Foundation.Google Scholar
Manzini, E. (1989). “The material of invention.” MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Pauli, G. (2018). “The Blue Economy:10 years, 100 innovations. 100 Million Jobs.” Paradigm Publications (New Mexico, USA)Google Scholar
Ramalhete, P. S., Senos, A. M. R., & Aguiar, C. (2010). “Digital tools for material selection in product design.” Materials & Design (1980–2015), 31(5), 2275–2287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sevaldson, B. (2011). “Nordic design research conference: GIGA-mapping: Visualisation for complexity and system thinking in design.” Nordes, 0(4).Google Scholar
Unger, D., & Eppinger, S. (2011). “Improving product development process design: A method for managing information flows, risks, and iterations.” Journal of Engineering Design, 22(10), 689–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vezzoli, C., Srinivasan, A. (2014), “Product-Service System Design for Sustainability”, Green Leaf Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
van Kesteren, I. E. H. (2008). “Product designers’ information needs in materials selection.” Materials and Design, 29(1), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2006.11.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkes, S., Wongsriruksa, S., Howes, P., Gamester, R., Witchel, H., Conreen, M., Laughlin, Z., Miodownik, M. (2014). “Design tools for interdisciplinary translation of material experiences.” Materials and Design. Vol. 90 (2016) 1228–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkes, S. E., Miodownik, M. A. (2018). “Materials library collections as tools for interdisciplinary research.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 43(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2018.1435450CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed