Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:33:14.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LINKING DIGITAL B2B PLATFORM BUSINESS MODELS AND PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS AND LITERATURE REVIEW

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Patrick Brecht ,
Daniel Hendriks ,
Manuel Niever ,
Carsten Hahn ,
Felix Pfaff ,
Simon Rapp  and
Albert Albers
Patrick Brecht*
Affiliation:
Karlsruher University of Applied Sciences;
Daniel Hendriks
Affiliation:
Karlsruher University of Applied Sciences;
Manuel Niever
Affiliation:
Karlsruher University of Applied Sciences;
Carsten Hahn
Affiliation:
Karlsruher University of Applied Sciences;
Felix Pfaff
Affiliation:
Karlsruher Institute of Technology (KIT)
Simon Rapp
Affiliation:
Karlsruher Institute of Technology (KIT)
Albert Albers
Affiliation:
Karlsruher Institute of Technology (KIT)
*
Brecht, Patrick, Karlsruher Institute of Applied Sciences, Germany, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Developing digital platform business models, especially in business-to-business (B2B) markets, has a high potential for companies who successfully develop their products in generations. The model of SGE - System Generation Engineering describes the development of mechatronic systems on subsystem level. The authors investigate to what extent a comprehensive and unified methodology can be identified, connecting the research areas of product development and digital B2B platform business models. Therefore, this study conducted a bibliometric analysis of scientific data to identify a research gap and a qualitative literature review to affirm the relevance of future research in this research area. The results show a gap between the research areas of digital B2B platform business models and product development. Essentially, several renowned platform researchers suggested performing future research with a methodology that fulfils the following purposes: (1) improve the general understanding of digital platforms, (2) understand their success factors and development, and (3) deal with challenges (e.g., monetization) and loss of valued personal relations in B2B markets through digitization.

Keywords

New product developmentBusiness models and considerationsResearch methodologies and methodsdigital platformsSGE - System Generation Engineering
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 2465 - 2474
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Albers, Albert; Bursac, Nikola; Wintergerst, Eike (2015): Produktgenerationsentwicklung – Bedeutung und Herausforderungen aus einer entwicklungsmethodischen Perspektive. In: Beiträge zum 3. Stuttgarter Symposium für Produktentwicklung (SSP). Stuttgart. Fraunhofer Verlag.Google Scholar
Albers, Albert; Rapp, Simon; Spadinger, Markus; Richter, Thilo; Birk, Clemens; Marthaler, Florian et al. (2019): The Reference System in the Model of PGE: Proposing a Generalized Description of Reference Products and their Interrelations. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Eng. Des. 1 (1), p. 1693–1702. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.175.Google Scholar
Albers, Albert; Basedow, Gustav N.; Heimicke, Jonas; Marthaler, Florian; Spadinger, Markus; Rapp, Simon (2020): Developing a common understanding of business models from the product development perspective. In: Procedia CIRP 91, p. 875–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.03.122.Google Scholar
Albers, Albert; Rapp, Simon (2022): Model of SGE: System Generation Engineering as Basis for Structured Planning and Management of Development. In: Dieter Krause und Emil Heyden (Hg.): Design Methodology for Future Products. Cham: Springer International Publishing, p. 27–46.Google Scholar
Albers, Albert; Kürten, Claas; Rapp, Simon; Birk, Clemens; Hünemeyer, Sebastian; Kempf, Christoph (2022): SGE – Systemgenerationsentwicklung : Analyse und Zusammenhänge von Entwicklungspfaden in der Produktentstehung.Google Scholar
de Roca, Basler, Roger (2022): Digitale Geschäftsmodelle und Marketingtrends | KMU Magazin. Available at: https://www.kmu-magazin.ch/digitalisierung-transformation/digitale-geschaeftsmodelle-und-marketingtrends (Accessed: 18.10.2022).Google Scholar
Brecht, Patrick; Niever, Manuel; Kerres, Roman; Ströbele, Anja; Hahn, Carsten H. (2021): Smart platform experiment cycle (SPEC): a process to design, analyze, and validate digital platforms. In: AIEDAM 35 (2), p. 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060421000081.Google Scholar
Brennan, Ross; Canning, Louise; McDowell, Raymond (2020): Business-to-business marketing. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
Bünte, Claudia (2020): Die chinesische KI-Revolution. Konsumverhalten, Marketing und Handel: Wie China mit Künstlicher Intelligenz die Wirtschaftswelt verändert. 1. Ed. 2020. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzydlowski, Jan W. (2015): Co-occurrence analysis as a framework for data mining. In: Journal of Technology Research, Vol. 6. Available at: https://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/152265.pdf (Accessed 28.11.2022)Google Scholar
Cambridge Dictionary (Hg.) (2022a): concept. Available at: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/concept (Accessed: 28.11.2022).Google Scholar
Cambridge Dictionary (Hg.) (2022b): framework. Available at: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/framework (Accessed 28.11.2022).Google Scholar
Coursera (2022): Academic Information Seeking | Coursera. Available at: https://www.coursera.org/learn/academicinfoseek (Accessed 04.10.2022).Google Scholar
Dahm, Markus H.; Thode, Stefan (2019): Strategie und Transformation im digitalen Zeitalter. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dori, Dov; Sillitto, Hillary; Griego, Regina M.; McKinney, Dorothy; Arnold, Eileen P.; Godfrey, Patrick et al. (2020): System Definition, System Worldviews, and Systemness Characteristics. In: IEEE Systems Journal 14 (2), p. 1538–1548. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2019.2904116.Google Scholar
Drewel, Marvin; Özcan, Leon; Gausemeier, Jürgen; Dumitrescu, Roman (2021): Platform Patterns—Using Proven Principles to Develop Digital Platforms. In: J Knowl Econ 12 (2), p. 519–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00772-3.Google Scholar
Hasler, Daniel; Schallmo, Daniel (2021): Bibliometric Analysis of Digital Platforms: Current State and Future Research. In: ISPIM Connects Valencia, November 2021. ISBN 978-952-335-691-7.Google Scholar
IPEK (Hg.) (2020a): Methode – IPEK-Glossar. Available at: https://www.ipek.kit.edu/glossar/index.php?title=Methode (Accessed 28.11.2022).Google Scholar
IPEK (Hg.) (2020b): Methodik – IPEK-Glossar. Available at: https://www.ipek.kit.edu/glossar/index.php?title=Methodik (Accessed 28.11.2022).Google Scholar
IPEK (Hg.) (2020c): System – IPEK-Glossar. Available at: https://www.ipek.kit.edu/glossar/index.php?title=System (Accessed 28.11.2022).Google Scholar
IPEK (Hg.) (2021a): Modell – IPEK-Glossar. Available at: https://www.ipek.kit.edu/glossar/index.php?title=Modell (Accessed 28.11.2022).Google Scholar
IPEK (Hg.) (2021b): Prozess – IPEK-Glossar. Available at: https://www.ipek.kit.edu/glossar/index.php?title=Prozess (Accessed 28.11.2022).Google Scholar
Jabbarova, Anora (2020): METHODOLOGY AND METHODS OF CULTURAL LINGUISTICS. In: International Engineering Journal For Research & Development.Google Scholar
Miranda, E. (2001): Improving subjective estimates using paired comparisons. In: IEEE Softw. 18 (1), p. 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1109/52.903173.Google Scholar
Parker, Geoffrey; van Alstyne, Marshall; Choudary, Sangeet Paul (2017): Platform revolution. How networked markets are transforming the economy and how to make them work for you. New York, London: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Rėklaitis, Kęstutis; Pilelienė, Lina (2019): Principle Differences between B2B and B2C Marketing Communication Processes. In: Management of Organizations: Systematic Research 81 (1), p. 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1515/mosr-2019-0005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ropohl, Günter (2009): Allgemeine Technologie : eine Systemtheorie der Technik: KIT Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_422388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rust, I. J.; Cetinkaya, Deniz; Seck, Mamadou; Wenzler, Ivo (2011): Business process simulation for management consultants: A DEVS-based Simplified Business Process Modelling Library. Conference: Proceedings of the 23rd European Modeling and Simulation Symposium (EMSS '11), p.709–714.Google Scholar
Samset, Knut (2020): What is a Concept?, p. 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230289925_10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scopus preview - Scopus - Welcome to Scopus (2022). Available at: https://www.scopus.com/standard/marketing.uri#basic (Accessed 25.08.2022).Google Scholar
Shree, Deep; Kumar Singh, Rajesh; Paul, Justin; Hao, Andy; Xu, Shichun (2021): Digital platforms for business-to-business markets: A systematic review and future research agenda. In: Journal of Business Research 137, p. 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.031.Google Scholar
Steur, Andreas J.; Bayrle, Niklas (2020): S-Curves in Platform-based Business – Facing the Challenge of the Tipping Point. Hg. v. PACIS 2020 Proceedings. Available at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2020/206 (Accessed 28.11.2022).Google Scholar
Thalheim, Bernhard (2017): Conceptual Modeling Foundations: The Notion of a Model in Conceptual Modeling, p. 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7993-3_80780-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallet, Sylvain D.; Miele, Adriana E.; Uciechowska-Kaczmarzyk, Urszula; Liwo, Adam; Duclos, Bertrand; Samsonov, Sergey A.; Ricard-Blum, Sylvie (2018): Insights into the structure and dynamics of lysyl oxidase propeptide, a flexible protein with numerous partners. In: Scientific reports 8 (1), p. 11768. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30190-6.Google ScholarPubMed
VOSviewer (2022): VOSviewer - Visualizing scientific landscapes. Available at: https://www.vosviewer.com/ (Accessed 25.08.2022).Google Scholar
Werani, Thomas (2012): Business-to-Business-Marketing. Ein wertbasierter Ansatz. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer Verlag (Kohlhammer Edition Marketing).Google Scholar
Whaley, Bryan B. (2014): Research Methods in Health Communication. Principles and Application: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Yang; Delft, Stephan von; Morgan-Thomas, Anna; Buck, Trevor (2020): The evolution of platform business models: Exploring competitive battles in the world of platforms. In: Long Range Planning 53 (4), p. 101892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101892.Google Scholar
Ziegler, M.; Steer, A.; Van Dijk, L.; Schreiber, J. (2022): B2B Platform Play: Revolutionizing the rules of B2B industries with platform business models. Hg. v. Porsche Consulting.Google Scholar