Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:32:43.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Karakuri IoT toolkit: a collaborative solution for ideating and prototyping IoT opportunities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Álvaro Aranda-Muñoz ,
Yuji Yamamoto  and
Kristian Sandström
Álvaro Aranda-Muñoz*
Affiliation:
Mälardalen University, Sweden RISE, Sweden
Yuji Yamamoto
Affiliation:
Mälardalen University, Sweden
Kristian Sandström
Affiliation:
Mälardalen University, Sweden
*
[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper presents a collaborative solution developed to enable people without prior Internet of Things (IoT) knowledge to ideate, conceptualise, role-play and prototype potential improvements to their work processes and environments. The solution, called the Karakuri IoT toolkit and method, was tested in two workshops with eight production leaders at a Swedish manufacturing company. Outcomes were analysed from the perspectives of materials interaction and instruments of inquiry. Results indicate the solution can help people conceive and prototype improvement ideas at early design stages.

Keywords

collaborative designinternet of things (IoT)early design phaseparticipatory design
Type
Design Organisation, Collaboration and Management
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 185 - 194
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Akundi, A., Euresti, D., Luna, S., Ankobiah, W., Lopes, A. and Edinbarough, I. (2022), “State of Industry 5.0—Analysis and Identification of Current Research Trends”, Applied System Innovation, Vol. 5 No. 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi5010027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambe, A.H., Brereton, M., Soro, A., Chai, M.Z., Buys, L. and Roe, P. (2019), “Older People Inventing Their Personal Internet of Things with the IoT Un-Kit Experience”, Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300552Google Scholar
Aranda-Muñoz, Á., Eriksson, Y., Yamamoto, Y., Florin, U. and Sandström, K. (2021), “To support IoT collaborative expressiveness on the shop floor”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 1, pp. 3149–3158. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aranda-Muñoz, Á., Florin, U., Eriksson, Y., Yamamoto, Y. and Sandström, K. (2020), “The Karakuri Card Deck: co-designing industrial IoT Conceptual Solutions”, Cambridge Core, Vol. 1, pp. 807–816. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briard, T, Jean, C, Aoussat, A, Véron, P. (2023), Integrating Sensors in Products: a New Tool for Design Education. Proceedings of the Design Society, 3, pp. 2345-2354. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pds.2023.235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brito, R. and Houghton, P. (2016), IoT Service Kit. Available at: https://iotservicekit.com (accessed 14.11.2023).Google Scholar
Söderlund, C., Florin, U., Lundin, J., & Uggla, K. (2020), Participatory Involvement and Multitheoretical Perspectives in Visual Management Design. Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, 1, 1541-1550. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalsgaard, P. (2017), “Instruments of Inquiry: Understanding the Nature and Role of Tools in Design”, International Journal of Design, Vol. 1 No. 11, pp. 21–33.Google Scholar
Dibitonto, M., Tazzi, F., Leszczynska, K. and Medaglia, C.M. (2019), “The IoT Design Deck 2.0: Improving the Tool for the Co-design of Connected Products”, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22646-6_5Google Scholar
Gianni, F., Mora, S. and Divitini, M. (2018), “RapIoT toolkit: Rapid prototyping of collaborative Internet of Things applications”, Future Generation Computer Systems, Vol. 95, pp. 867–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.02.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanington, B. and Martin, B. (2019), Universal Methods of Design Expanded and Revised: 125 Ways to Research Complex Problems, Develop Innovative Ideas, and Design Effective Solutions, Rockport Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
Hornecker, E. (2010), “Creative Idea Exploration within the Structure of a Guiding Framework: The Card Brainstorming Game”, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1145/1709886.1709905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurze, A., Totzauer, S., Deschamps-Sonsino, A. and Berger, A. (2019), “A Collaborative Landscaping Exercise of IoT Design Methods”, Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 307–311. https://doi.org/10.1145/3369457.3369484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luong, M. (2021), MakerCards. Available at: https://www.mirandaluong.com/makercards (accessed 14.11.2023).Google Scholar
McMullin, J. (2011), Business Origami - UX Week 2011 Workshop. Available at: https://www.slideshare.net/jessmcmullin/business-origami-ux-week-2011-workshop (accessed 14.11.2023).Google Scholar
MESH, . (2021). MESH. Available at: https://meshprj.com/en/ (accessed 14.11.2023).Google Scholar
Mora, S., Gianni, F. and Divitini, M. (2017), “Tiles: A Card-Based Ideation Toolkit for the Internet of Things”, Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, D., Loke, L. and Ahmadpour, N. (2020), “Toolkits, cards and games – a review of analogue tools for collaborative ideation”, CoDesign, pp. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2020.1715444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizvi, M. (2021), “Supporting End Users in Designing IoT SmartThings with the IoTgo Toolkit”, EMPATHY: Empowering People in Dealing with Internet of Things Ecosystems. Workshop with INTERACT, Bari, Italy.Google Scholar
Roeck, D.D., Tanghe, J., Jacoby, A., Moons, I. and Slegers, K. (2019), “Ideas of Things: The IOT Design Kit”, Companion Publication of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2019 Companion, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301019.3323888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romero, D., Stahre, J. and Taisch, M. (2019), “The Operator 4.0: Towards Socially Sustainable Factories of the Future”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 139, p. 106128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roumelioti, E. (2022), Smart Thing Design by Children: The SNaP Model and Toolkit, [PhD Thesis], Free University of Bozen-Bolzano.Google Scholar
Sanders, E. and Stappers, P.J. (2014), “Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning”, CoDesign, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.888183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonsen, J. and Robertson, T. (2012), Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, Routledge, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M.P., Boxall, P., Chen, J.J.J., Xu, X., Liew, A. and Adeniji, A. (2020), “Operator 4.0 or Maker 1.0? Exploring the implications of Industrie 4.0 for innovation, safety and quality of work in small economies and enterprises”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 139, p. 105486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.10.047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitali, I., and Arquilla, V. (2018), "Developing a Design Toolkit for the Internet of Things", in Storni, C., Leahy,Google Scholar
K., McMahon, M., Lloyd, P. and Bohemia, E. (eds.), Design as a catalyst for change - DRS InternationalGoogle Scholar
Conference 2018, 25-28 June, Limerick, Ireland. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2018.447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheler, A.P. de A., Kelner, J., Junior, R.S.R. and Nogueira, T.D. (2020), “IoT4Fun rapid prototyping tools for Toy User Interfaces”, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol. 44, p. 101009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2020.101009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiberg, M. (2018), “Addressing IoT: Towards Material-Centered Interaction Design”, Springer International Publishing, pp. 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91238-7_17Google Scholar
Wichmann, R.L., Eisenbart, B. and Gericke, K. (2019), “The Direction of Industry: A Literature Review on Industry 4.0”, International Conference on Engineering Design 2019, ICED 2019, Vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, pp. 2129–2138. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.219Google Scholar