Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T19:28:22.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INTERDISCIPLINARY SYSTEM ARCHITECTURES IN AGILE MODULAR DEVELOPMENT IN THE PRODUCT GENERATION DEVELOPMENT MODEL USING THE EXAMPLE OF A MACHINE TOOL MANUFACTURER

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Clemens Birk ,
Marc Zuefle ,
Albert Albers ,
Nikola Bursac  and
Dieter Krause
Clemens Birk
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Marc Zuefle*
Affiliation:
Hamburg University of Technology
Albert Albers
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Nikola Bursac
Affiliation:
TRUMPF Werkzeugmaschinen GmbH + Co. KG
Dieter Krause
Affiliation:
Hamburg University of Technology
*
Zuefle, Marc, Hamburg University of Technology, Institut of Product Development and Mechanical Engineering Design, Germany, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper considers the orientation of product development structures towards interdisciplinary system architectures using the example of a tool machine manufacturer. Due to the change from simple mechanical products to extensively designed systems, whose successful development requires the integration of all disciplines involved, it is analyzed which requirements there are for these interdisciplinary system architectures in today's development environment. In addition, it is validated on the basis of the investigation environment that interdisciplinary system structures are necessary for the development on the different levels of the system view. In doing so, the investigation environment addresses the concept of extracting customer-relevant features (systems) from a physical-tailored modular system (supersystem) in order to develop and test them autonomously, as well as to transfer them to the entire product range in a standardized manner. The elaboration identifies basic requirements for the development of a knowledge base in interdisciplinary system structures and places them into the context of an agile modular kit development.

Keywords

Systems Engineering (SE)Multi- / Cross- / Trans-disciplinary processesIntegrated product developmentagile modular developmentinterdisciplinary modularization
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 1897 - 1906
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Abramovici, M. and Herzog, O. (Eds.) (2016), Engineering im Umfeld von Industrie 4.0:Einschätzungen und Handlungsbedarf, acatech Studie, Herbert Utz Verlag, München.Google Scholar
Albers, A. and Braun, A. (2011), “Der Prozess der Produktentstehung”, in Handbuch Leichtbau: Methoden, Werkstoffe, Fertigung. Hrsg.: F. Henning, Carl Hanser Verlag, pp. 5–30.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Burkhardt, N., Meboldt, M. and Saak, M. (2005), SPALTEN Problem Solving Methodology in the Product Development.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Bursac, N. and Wintergerst, E. (2015a), “Produktgenerationsentwicklung – Bedeutung und Herausforderungen aus einer entwicklungsmethodischen Perspektive”.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Lohmeyer, Q. and Ebel, B. (2011), “Dimensions of objectives in interdisciplinary product development projects”, ICED 11 - 18th International Conference on Engineering Design - Impacting Society Through Engineering Design, Vol. 2, pp. 256–265.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Rapp, S., Birk, C. and Bursac, N. (2017), “Die Frühe Phase der PGE – Produktgenerationsentwicklung”.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Reiss, N., Bursac, N. and Breitschuh, J. (2016a), “15 Years of SPALTEN Problem Solving Methodology in Product Development”.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Reiss, N., Bursac, N. and Richter, T. (2016b), “iPeM – Integrated Product Engineering Model in Context of Product Generation Engineering”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 50, pp. 100–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albers, A., Scherer, H., Bursac, N. and Rachenkova, G. (2015b), “Model Based Systems Engineering in Construction Kit Development – Two Case Studies”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 36, pp. 129–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badke-Schaub, P. and Frankenberger, E. (2004), Management Kritischer Situationen, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blees, C. (2011), “Eine Methode zur Entwicklung modularer Produktfamilien”, TUHH Universitätsbibliothek, 2011.Google Scholar
Blees, C., Jonas, H. and Krause, D. (2010), “Development of Modular Product Families”, in Wynn, D.C. (Ed.), Managing complexity by modelling dependencies: Proceedings of the 12th International DSM Conference Cambridge, UK, 22 - 23 July 2010, 22.-23.07.2010, Cambridge, Hanser.Google Scholar
Blessing, L.T.M. and Chakrabarti, A. (2009), DRM, a design research methodology, Springer, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhm, R., Fuchs, E. and Fischer, M. (2002), System-Entwicklung in der Wirtschaftsinformatik, Wirtschaftsinformatik, 5., vollst. überarb. Aufl., vdf Hochsch.-Verl. an der ETH, Zürich.Google Scholar
Bursac, N., Albers, A. and Schmitt, T. (2016), “Model Based Systems Engineering in Modular Design – A Potential Analysis using Portal Type Scraper Reclaimers as an Example”, Procedia CIRPCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daenzer, W.F. and Haberfellner, R. (Eds.) (2002), Systems engineering: Methodik und Praxis, 11.th ed., Verl. Industrielle Organisation, Zürich.Google Scholar
Dörner, D. (2011), Die Logik des Misslingens: Strategisches Denken in komplexen Situationen, 1. Aufl., Rowohlt Digitalbuch, Reinbek.Google Scholar
Drave, I., Rumpe, B., Wortmann, A., Berroth, J., Hoepfner, G., Jacobs, G., Spuetz, K., Zerwas, T., Guist, C. and Kohl, J. (1016 2020), “Modeling mechanical functional architectures in SysML”, in Syriani, E.and Sahraoui, H. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, 16 10 2020 23 10 2020, Virtual Event Canada, ACM.Google Scholar
Dumitrescu, R., Fechtelpeter, C. and Kühn, A. (2014), “Systematische Berücksichtigung von Fertigungsanforderungen im Model-Based Systems Engineering”, in Maurer, M. and Schulze, S.- O. (Eds.), Tag des Systems Engineering, Carl Hanser Verlag, München, Bremen.Google Scholar
Erixon, G. (1998), Modular function deployment: A method for product modularisation, Zugl.: Stockholm, Kungl. Tekn. Högsk., Diss., 1998, TRITA-MSM, Vol. 98, 1, The Royal Inst. of Technology Dept. of Manufacturing Systems Assembly Systems Division, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Gausemeier, J., Ebbesmeyer, P. and Kallmeyer, F. (2001), Produktinnovation: Strategische Planung und Entwicklung der Produkte von morgen, Hanser, München, Wien.Google Scholar
Greve, E., Rennpferdt, C. and Krause, D. (2020), “Harmonizing cross-departmental Perspectives on Modular Product Families”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 91, pp. 452–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, D., Beckmann, G., Eilmus, S., Gebhardt, N., Jonas, H. and Rettberg, R. (2014), “Integrated Development of Modular Product Families: A Methods Toolkit”, in Simpson, T.W., Jiao, J., Siddique, Z. and Hölttä-Otto, K. (Eds.), Advances in Product Family and Product Platform Design, Springer.Google Scholar
Lindemann, U. (2005), Methodische Entwicklung technischer Produkte: Methoden flexibel und situationsgerecht anwenden, VDI-Buch, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Marshall, R. and Leaney, P.G. (1999), “A systems engineering approach to product modularity”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Journal of Engineering Manufacture.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meboldt, M. (2008), Mental and formal modelling, a contribution to the integratet product development model (iPeM).Google Scholar
Munker, F. (2016), A User-Oriented Concept of Systems Modeling for Interdisciplinary Product Eng.Google Scholar
Ott, S. (2009), Konzept zur methodischen System-Modellierung in der anforderungsgerechten Produktentwicklung, Zugl.: Wuppertal, Univ., Diss., 2009, Berichte zum Generic-Management.Google Scholar
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J. and Grote, K.-H. (2003), Pahl/Beitz Konstruktionslehre: Grundlagen erfolgreicher Produktentwicklung. Methoden und Anwendung, Springer Berlin Heidelberg,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimmler, T.U. and Eppinger, S.D. (1994), Integration analysis of product decompositions, Working papers, available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/mit/sloanp/2514.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripperda, S. and Krause, D. (2017), “Cost Effects of Modular Product Family Structures: Methods and Quantification of Impacts to Support Decision Making”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, H., Albers, A. and Bursac, N. (2017), “Model Based Requirements Engineering for the Development of Modular Kits”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 60, pp. 145–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwaber, K. (2012), Agiles Projektmanagement mit Scrum, 3. [Dr.], Microsoft Press, Unterschleißheim.Google Scholar
Sitte, J. and Winzer, P. (2012), in Maurer, M. and Schulze, S.-O. (Eds.), Tag des Systems Engineering, Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, München, pp. 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walden, D.D., Roedler, G.J., Forsberg, K., Hamelin, R.D. and Shortell, T.M. (Eds.) (2015), Systems engineering handbook: A guide for system life cycle processes and activities; INCOSE-TP-2003-002-04, 2015, 4. edition, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
WiGeP (2017), WiGeP-Positionspapier: „Smart Engineering“: Im Kontext von Industrie 4.0 werden sich Produkte und damit einhergehend auch das Engineering dieser Produkte radikal verändern., www.wigep.de,.Google Scholar
Winzer, P. (2016), Generic Systems Engineering, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wulf, J.E. (2002), “Elementarmethoden zur Lösungssuche”, Dissertation, Technische Universität München, München, 2002.Google Scholar