Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-t27h7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-17T19:09:49.159Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improved Approach to Implementing Design Education for Additive Manufacturing Using a RC Model Race Car

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

S. Junk
S. Junk*
Affiliation:
Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Germany
*
[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The integration of additive manufacturing processes into the teaching of students is an important prerequisite for the further dissemination of this new technology. In this context, the DfAM is of particular importance. For this reason, this paper presents an approach in which a connection is made between methodical product development and practical implementation by AM. Using a model racing car as an example, students independently develop significant improvements of particular assemblies. A final evaluation shows that the students have significantly improved their skills and competencies.

Keywords

design educationadditive manufacturingproduct developmentevaluationcomputer-aided design (CAD)
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 2: DESIGN2022 , May 2022 , pp. 2303 - 2312
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Adam, G. A. O. (2015): Systematische Erarbeitung von Konstruktionsregeln für die additiven Fertigungsverfahren Lasersintern, Laserschmelzen und Fused Deposition Modeling, Forschungsberichte des Direct Manufacturing Research Centers, Shaker Verlag, Düren, Germany.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Reiß, N., Bursac, J. and Breitschuh, J., “15 Years of SPALTEN Problem Solving Methodology in Product Development,” Proceedings of NordDesign 2016, pp. 2016, Volume 1, pp. 411–420.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Burkhardt, N., Meboldt, M. and Saak, M. (2005), “SPALTEN Problem Solving Methodology in the Product Development”, ICED 05: Engineering Design and the Global Economy, pp. 3513–3524. 10.5445/IR/1000007075Google Scholar
Celani, G. (2012), “Digital Fabrication Laboratories: Pedagogy and Impacts on Architectural Education”, Nexus Network Journal, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 469–482. 10.1007/s00004-012-0120-xGoogle Scholar
Chen, T., Egan, P., Stöckli, F. and Shea, K. (2015a), “Studying the Impact of Incorporating an Additive Manufacturing Based Design Exercise in a Large, First Year Technical Drawing and CAD Course”, in Proceedings of the ASME 2015 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 3, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, ASME. 10.1115/DETC2015-47312.Google Scholar
Chen, T., Stöckli, F. and Shea, K. (2015b), “Design for mass customization using additive manufacture: case-study of a balloon-powered car”, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 15) Vol 4: Design for X, No. Vol 4: Design for X, pp. 245–254.Google Scholar
Diegel, O., Nordin, A. and Motte, D. (2020), A practical guide to design for additive manufacturing, Springer series in advanced manufacturing, Springer, Singapore. 10.1007/978-981-13-8281-9Google Scholar
Ford, P. and Dean, L. (2013), “Additive manufacturing in product design education: out with the old and in with the new?”, Proceedings of E&PDE 2013 the 15th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design, pp. 611–616.Google Scholar
Gibson, I., Rosen, D.W., Stucker, B. and Khorasani, M. (2021), Additive manufacturing technologies, Third edition, Springer, Cham, Switzerland. 10.1007/978-3-030-56127-7Google Scholar
Hao, R.-C., Liu, H.-G., Wang, S. (2020). Study on Teaching of Engineering Design Course with 3D Modeling Software and 3D Printer in International Training Course. In Liu, S., Sun, G., & Fu, W. (Eds.), Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering. e-Learning, e-Education, and Online Training (Vol. 339, pp. 362–369). Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-030-63952-5_31Google Scholar
Heyden, E., Küchenhof, J., Greve, E. and Krause, D. (2020), “Development of a Design Education Platform for an Interdisciplinary Teaching Concept”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 91, pp. 553–558. 10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.213Google Scholar
Junk, S. (2014). New approach in design education using additive manufacturing. Proceedings of the DESIGN 2014 13th International Design Conference, 1391–1398Google Scholar
Junk, S. (2017). Integration of sustainable design and additive manufacturing in design education. In da Silva, F. M., Bártolo, H., Bártolo, P., Almendra, R., Roseta, F., Almeida, H. A., & Lemos, A. C. (Eds.), Challenges for Technology Innovation: An Agenda for the Future (pp. 171–175). CRC Press. 10.1201/9781315198101-31Google Scholar
Junk, S. (2020, April 27–30). Work in Progress: Design Education for Additive Manufacturing using RC Race Car Models. In: 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1–4). IEEE. 10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125111Google Scholar
Junk, S., Matt, R. (2015). New Approach to Introduction of 3D Digital Technologies in Design Education. Procedia CIRP, 36, 35–40. 10.1016/j.procir.2015.01.045Google Scholar
Klahn, C., Meboldt, M., Fontana, F.F., Leutenecker-Twelsiek, B. and Jansen, J. (2018), Entwicklung und Konstruktion für die Additive Fertigung: Grundlagen und Methoden für den Einsatz in industriellen Endkundenprodukten, 1. Edition, Vogel Business Media, Würzburg.Google Scholar
Kriesi, C., Steinert, M., Meboldt, M. and Balters, S. (2014), “Physiological Data Acquisition for Deeper Insights into Prototyping”, Proceedings of NordDesign 2014, pp. 580–589.Google Scholar
Leary, M. (2020). Design for additive manufacturing. Additive manufacturing materials and technologies. Amsterdam, Cambridge, MA, Oxford: Elsevier. 10.1016/C2017-0-04238-6Google Scholar
Mostert-van der Sar, M., Mulder, I., Remijn, L. and Troxler, P. (2013), “Fablabs in design education”, DS 76: Proceedings of E&PDE 2013, the 15th Intern. Conference on Engineering and Product Design, pp. 629–634.Google Scholar
Prabhu, R., Miller, S. R., Simpson, T. W., & Meisel, N. A. (2018). Teaching Design Freedom: Exploring the Effects of Design for Additive Manufacturing Education on the Cognitive Components of Students’ Creativity. In Volume 3: 20th International Conference on Advanced Vehicle Technologies; 15th International Conference on Design Education. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. 10.1115/DETC2018-85938Google Scholar
Prabhu, R., Miller, S.R., Simpson, T.W. and Meisel, N.A. (2020), “Exploring the Effects of Additive Manufacturing Education on Students' Engineering Design Process and its Outcomes”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 142 No. 4, p. 255. 10.1115/1.4044324.Google Scholar
Unver, E., Paul, A. and Dave, T. (2006), “Applying 3D Scanning and Modeling in Transport Design Education”, Computer-Aided Design and Applications, Vol. 3 No. 1-4, pp. 41–48. 10.1080/16864360.2006.10738440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widden, M. and Gunn, K. (2010), “Design–build–test of model aerofoils for engineering education using FDM”, Virtual and Physical Prototyping, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 189–194. 10.1080/17452759.2010.528841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohlers, T., Campbell, R.I., Diegel, O., Huff, R. and Kowen, J. (2020), Wohlers report 2020: 3D printing and additive manufacturing state of the industry, WOHLERS ASSOCIATES, Fort Collins, Colo.Google Scholar