Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:32:43.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of Autonomous Solutions on Electric Earthmoving Design Using Machine Learning: Case Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

A. Abdelmassih ,
R. Faddoul  and
F. Geara
A. Abdelmassih*
Affiliation:
Ecole Superieur d’Ingenieurs de Beyrouth (ESIB), USJ, Beirut, Lebanon
R. Faddoul
Affiliation:
Ecole Superieur d’Ingenieurs de Beyrouth (ESIB), USJ, Beirut, Lebanon
F. Geara
Affiliation:
Ecole Superieur d’Ingenieurs de Beyrouth (ESIB), USJ, Beirut, Lebanon
*
[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The increased development in automated driving systems (ADS) has opened up significant opportunities to revolutionize mobility and to set the path for technologies, such as electrification. The proposed methodology is a simulation model backed by a multi-objective optimization algorithm. This research investigates the adoption of future technologies in earthmoving application and explores its implications on the design of future machine concepts in terms of equipment size. The shift from “elephant to ants” in the machine selection, resulted in improved feasibility.

Keywords

conceptual designproduct developmentautonomous vehicleselectromobilitymachine learning
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 2: DESIGN2022 , May 2022 , pp. 1491 - 1500
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Abdelmassih, A., Faddoul, R. and Geara, F. (2021a), “A machine learning approach on earthmoving fleet selection”, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, presented at the 6th International Congress on Information & Communication Technology, Springer, London.Google Scholar
Abdelmassih, A., Faddoul, R. and Geara, F. (2021b), “Optimizing earthmoving operations with minimal emissions cost”, Proceedings 2021 ASCE I3CE, presented at the International Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering (i3CE 2021), American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Orlando FL, US.Google Scholar
Barbosa, F., Woetzel, J. and Mischke, J. (2017), Reinventing Construction: A Route of Higher Productivity, McKinsey Global Institute.Google Scholar
Bertoni, A., Larsson, T., Larsson, J. and Elfsberg, J. (2017), “Mining data to design value: A demonstrator in early design”, DS 87-7 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17) Vol 7: Design Theory and Research Methodology, Vancouver, Canada, 21-25.08. 2017, pp. 021–029.Google Scholar
Börjesson, M., Johansson, M. and Kageson, P. (2021), “The economics of electric roads”, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Elsevier, Vol. 125, p. 102990. DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2021.102990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earl, T., Mathieu, L., Cornelis, S., Kenny, S., Ambel, C.C. and Nix, J. (2018), “Analysis of long haul battery electric trucks in EU”, Commercial Vehicle Workshop, Graz.Google Scholar
Elfsberg, J.V., Johansson, C., Frank, M., Larsson, A., Larsson, T. and Leifer, L. (2021), “How Covid-19 Enabled a Global Student Design Team to Achieve Breakthrough Innovation”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Cambridge University Press, Vol. 1, pp. 1705–1714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ertel, W. (2017), Introduction to Artificial Intelligence, Springer, available at: 10.1007/978.3.319.58487.4.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2017), “Electrification of the transport system”, Directorate – General for Research and Innovation.Google Scholar
European Union. (2020), Eurostat: Electricity Prices for Non-Household Consumers, available at: https://ec.europa.eu /eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Electricity_price_statistics#Electricity_prices_for_non-household_consumers.Google Scholar
Frank, M., Ruvald, R., Johansson, C., Larsson, T. and Larsson, A. (2019), “Towards autonomous construction equipment-supporting on-site collaboration between automatons and humans”, International Journal of Product Development, Inderscience Publishers (IEL), Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 292–308. DOI: 10.1504/ijpd.2019.105496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghandriz, T., Jacobson, B., Laine, L. and Hellgren, J. (2020), “Impact of automated driving systems on road freight transport and electrified propulsion of heavy vehicles”, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Elsevier, Vol. 115, p. 102610. DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Göhlich, D., Fay, T.-A. and Park, S. (2019), “Conceptual design of urban e-bus systems with special focus on battery technology”, Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, pp. 2823–2832.Google Scholar
Guyot, E. (2020), “Electromobility's time has come”, Volvo Construction Equipment AB, available at: https://www.volvoce.com/global/en/news-and-events/news-and-stories/2020/electromobilitys-time-has-come/ (accessed 3 May 2020).Google Scholar
He, X. and Jiang, Y. (2018), “Review of hybrid electric systems for construction machinery”, Automation in Construction, Elsevier, Vol. 92, pp. 286–296. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.04.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotz, A.J., Miller, E., Watson, A. and Kelly, K.J. (2020), “Transit Bus Electrification Evaluation from GPS Speed Traces”, 2020 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference & Expo (ITEC), IEEE, pp. 1069–1074. DOI: 10.1109/itec48692.2020.9161511Google Scholar
Lebeau, P., Macharis, C. and Van Mierlo, J. (2019), “How to improve the total cost of ownership of electric vehicles: An analysis of the light commercial vehicle segment”, World Electric Vehicle Journal, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Vol. 10 No. 4, p. 90. DOI: 10.3390/wevj10040090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luckow, P., Stanton, E.A., Fields, S., Biewald, B., Jackson, S., Fisher, J. and Wilson, R. (2015), “2015 carbon dioxide price forecast”, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Machchhar, R.J. and Bertoni, A. (2021), “Data-driven design automation for product-service systems design: framework and lessons learned from empirical studies”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Cambridge University Press, Vol. 1, pp. 841–850.Google Scholar
Marzouk, M. and Moselhi, O. (2002), “Simulation optimization for earthmoving operations using genetic algorithms”, Construction Management & Economics, Taylor & Francis, Vol. 20 No. 6, pp. 535–543.Google Scholar
Melenbrink, N., Werfel, J. and Menges, A. (2020), “On-site autonomous construction robots: Towards unsupervised building”, Automation in Construction, Elsevier, Vol. 119, p. 103312. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, M. (1999), An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms, Cambridge: A Bradford Book, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Müller, U. (2019), “Electric vehicle technology”, available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wo2tEacdpI8 &list=FLmsnbmDYvZqM73mU48jVB5Q&index=3&t=0s (accessed 17 January 2020).Google Scholar
RazaviAlavi, S. and AbouRizk, S. (2017), “Site layout and construction plan optimization using an integrated genetic algorithm simulation framework”, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 31 No. 4, p. 04017011.Google Scholar
Schober, K.S. (2020), “Artificial intelligence in the construction industry”, Roland Berger. Roland Berger GmbH.Google Scholar
Schockenhoff, F., König, A., Zähringer, M. and Lienkamp, M. (2021), “User Need-oriented Concept Development of Autonomous Vehicles”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Cambridge University Press, Vol. 1, pp. 3349–3358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidner, O., Pettersson, R., Persson, J.A. and Ölvander, J. (2021), “Multidisciplinary design optimization of a mobile miner using the openMDAO platform”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Cambridge University Press, Vol. 1, pp. 2207–2216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volvo, CE. (2018), “Vikan Kross quarry fact sheet”, available at: https://www.volvoce.com/-/media/volvoce/global/global-site/electric-site/vikan-kross-quarry.pdf?v=Z4lCPw (accessed 1 December 2020).Google Scholar
Volvo Construction Equipment. (2015), “Volvo Performance Manual”, Volvo Global Marketing.Google Scholar
Wadud, Z. (2017), “Fully automated vehicles: A cost of ownership analysis to inform early adoption”, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, Vol. 101, pp. 163–176. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.005Google Scholar
Werber, M., Fischer, M. and Schwartz, P.V. (2009), “Batteries: Lower cost than gasoline?”, Energy Policy, Elsevier, Vol. 37 No. 7, pp. 2465–2468. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.045Google Scholar
Wu, G., Inderbitzin, A. and Bening, C. (2015), “Total cost of ownership of electric vehicles compared to conventional vehicles: A probabilistic analysis and projection across market segments”, Energy Policy, Elsevier, Vol. 80, pp. 196–214. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.004Google Scholar