Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:40:15.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Future-robust product portfolio development: insights into the advancement of product portfolios in companies – an interview study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Michael Schlegel*
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Markus Just
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Ingrid Wiederkehr
Affiliation:
Heinz Nixdorf Institute, Paderborn University, Germany
Carsten Thümmel
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Christoph Kempf
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Christian Koldewey
Affiliation:
Heinz Nixdorf Institute, Paderborn University, Germany
Roman Dumitrescu
Affiliation:
Heinz Nixdorf Institute, Paderborn University, Germany
Albert Albers
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A volatile environment and an increasing number of products along with a growing range of functions pose a challenge for companies when it comes to further development. Existing methods are no longer sufficient to cope with these challenges. In order to develop new methods, the process and challenges in the advancement of product portfolios must be understood. In this paper we conduct an interview study with ten experts to gain a better understanding of the advancement of product portfolios. Triggers, changes and actions are examined and goals and requirements for new methods are derived.

Type
Design Methods and Tools
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Albers, A. and Rapp, S. (2022), “Model of SGE: System Generation Engineering as Basis for Structured Planning and Management of Development”, in Krause, D. and Heyden, E. (Eds.), Design Methodology for Future Products: Data Driven, Agile and Flexible, Springer eBook Collection, 1st ed. 2022, Springer Int. Publishing.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Rapp, S., Spadinger, M., Richter, T., Birk, C., Marthaler, M., Heimicke, J., Kurtz, V. and Wessels, H. (2019), Das Referenzsystem im Modell der PGE – Produktgenerationsentwicklung: Vorschlag einer generalisierten Beschreibung von Referenzprodukten und ihrer Wechselbeziehungen.Google Scholar
Alfieri, A., Castiglione, C. and Pastore, E. (2020), “A multi-objective tabu search algorithm for product portfolio selection: A case study in the automotive industry”, Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 142.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. and Edgett, S. (1999), “Portfolio management for new products”, in Smart, W.B. and Smart, D.T. (Eds.), Over The Rim, Utah State University Press, pp. 191199.Google Scholar
Dumitrescu, R., Albers, A., Riedel, O., Stark, R. and Gausemeier, J. (2021), Engineering in Deutschland – Status quo in Wirtschaft und Wissenschaft: Ein Beitrag zum Advanced Systems Engineering, Paderborn.Google Scholar
Fahl, J., Hirschter, T., Kamp, J., Endl, M. and Albers, A. (2019), “Functional Concepts in the model of PGE - Product Generation Engineering by the Example of Automotive Product Development”, in IEEE (Ed.), Proceedings of 5th International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE) 2019, 01.-03.10.2019, Edinburgh, UK, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, n. p.Google Scholar
Gausemeier, J., Dumitrescu, R., Echterfeld, J., Pfänder, T., Steffen, D. and Thielemann, F. (2019), Innovationen für die Märkte von morgen: Strategische Planung von Produkten, Dienstleistungen und Geschäftsmodellen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonas, H. and Krause, D. (2011), “Strategic planning for modular product families”, 15-19 August 2011, Lyngby/Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
Krause, D. and Gebhardt, N. (2018), Methodische Entwicklung modularer Produktfamilien, Springer Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahtinen, N., Mustonen, E. and Harkonen, J. (2021), “Commercial and Technical Productization for Fact-Based Product Portfolio Management over Lifecycle”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 68 No.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayring, P. (2015), Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken, 12., überarbeitete Auflage, Beltz Verlag, Weinheim, Basel.Google Scholar
Meyer, M., Tröster, P.M., Hemkentokrax, J.-P., Schlegel, M., Kling, C., Koldewey, C., Rapp, S., Dumitrescu, R. and Albers, A. (2021), “Zukunftsrobuste Weiterentwicklung von Produktportfolios: Erkenntnisse und Handlungsbedarfe aus der Praxis”, Symposium für Vorausschau und Technologieplanung Berlin 2022.Google Scholar
Schlegel, M., Wiederkehr, I., Rapp, S., Koldewey, C., Albers, A. and Dumitrescu, R. (2023a), “Design of a Descriptive Model for Product Portfolio Evolution Based on the Model of SGE – System Generation Engineering”, R&D Management Conference, Seville Spain.Google Scholar
Schlegel, M., Wiederkehr, I., Rapp, S., Koldewey, C., Albers, A. and Roman, D. (2023b), “Future-robust evolution of product portfolios: Need for action from theory and practice”, 56th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems, CIRP CMS ‘23, South Africa, Vol. 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, K.T. and Eppinger, S.D. (2016), Product design and development, 6. ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.Google Scholar