Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T04:37:05.433Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EXTRACTING DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FROM INTERACTIVE GENETIC ALGORITHM EXPERIMENTS: APPLICATION TO THE DESIGN OF SOUNDS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Tom Souaille ,
Jean-François Petiot ,
Mathieu Lagrange  and
Nicolas Misdariis
Tom Souaille
Affiliation:
Ecole Centrale de Nantes, LS2N;
Jean-François Petiot*
Affiliation:
Ecole Centrale de Nantes, LS2N;
Mathieu Lagrange
Affiliation:
Ecole Centrale de Nantes, LS2N;
Nicolas Misdariis
Affiliation:
IRCAM
*
Petiot, Jean-François, Ecole Centrale de Nantes, LS2N, France, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The integration of users' perception in the design process is and important challenge for the optimization of products. This study describes how design recommendations can be drawn, from a perceptual experiment with a panel of subjects using a multi-objective interactive genetic algorithm (IGA). The application concerns the bi-objective optimization of the unpleasantness and the detectability of sounds for electric vehicles (EV). After a description of the experimental protocol for the assessment of the detectability and the unpleasantness of EV sounds (listening test), a set of optimal sounds (Pareto efficient) is defined with an IGA experiment. The analysis of these sounds, based on a probabilistic analysis of the selection process, leads to the definition of design recommendations. A second listening test, involving recommended sounds but also other design proposals, allows an evaluation of the validity of the approach. Results show that the sounds recommended obtain interesting performance, in particular to improve the detectability of EV sounds.

Keywords

OptimisationUser centred designParticipatory designsound designinteractiveoptimisation
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 1567 - 1576
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., and Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 182–197.10.1109/4235.996017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillibrand, A., Suffield, I., Vinamata, X., Williams, R. and Brückmann, A. (2011), “An Initial Study to Develop Appropriate Warning Sound for a Luxury Vehicle Using an Exterior Sound Simulator”. SAE International, 2011-01-1727.10.4271/2011-01-1727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konet, H., Sato, M., Schiller, T., Christensen, A., Tabata, T., and Kanuma, T., (2011), “Development of Approaching Vehicle Sound for Pedestrians (VSP) for Quiet Electric Vehicles”, SAE International, 2011-01-0928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.K., Lee, S.M., Shin, T. and Han, M. (2017), “Objective evaluation of the sound quality of the warning sound of electric vehicles with a consideration of the masking effect: annoyance and detectability”. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 18(4), pp. 699−705 (2017). https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12239−017−0069−6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misdariis, N., Cera, A., Levallois, E., and Locqueteau, C., (2012), “Do electric cars have to make noise? An emblematic opportunity for designing sounds and soundscapes”. Proc. of Acoustics 2012, Nantes, France.Google Scholar
Misdariis, N., Gruson, A. and Susini, P. (2013), “Detectability study of warning signals in urban background noises: A first step for designing the sound of electric vehicles”. Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. 19, 040032 (2013); https://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4799454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parizet, E., Ellermeier, W. and Robart, R. (2014), “Auditory warnings for electric vehicles: Detectability in normal-vision and visually-impaired listeners”, Applied Acoustics, Volume 86, Pages 50–58.10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.05.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petiot, J-F., Legeay, K., and Lagrange, M. (2019). Optimization of the Sound of Electric Vehicles According to Unpleasantness and Detectability. Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, 1(1), 3949–3958. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.402Google Scholar
Petiot, J-F., Kristensen, B.G. and Maier, A.M. (2013), “How should an electric vehicle sound? User and expert perception”. Proceedings of IDETC/CIE 2013, August 4-7, 2013, Portland, Oregon, USA.10.1115/DETC2013-12535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poirson, E., Petiot, J-F., Boivin, L. and Blumenthal, D. (2013), “Eliciting User Perceptions Using Assessment Tests Based on an Interactive Genetic Algorithm”. ASME. J. Mech. Des. 135(3):031004-031004-16.10.1115/1.4023282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poveda-Martínez, P., Peral-Orts, R., Campillo-Davo, N., Nescolarde-Selva, J., Lloret-Climent, M., and Ramis-Soriano, J. (2017). Study of the effectiveness of electric vehicle warning sounds depending on the urban environment. Applied Acoustics, 116, 317–328.10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.10.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robart, R., Parizet, E., Chamard, J. C., Janssens, K. and Biancardi, F. (2013), “eVADER: A perceptual approach to finding minimum warning sound requirements for quiet cars”. AIA-DAGA 2013 Conf. Acoustics, 1.Google Scholar
Sylcott, B., Michalek, J. J. and Cagan, J. 2015. Exploring the role of interaction effects in visual conjoint analysis. Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 137.10.1115/1.4031054CrossRefGoogle Scholar