Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T04:37:00.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EXPLORING SUSTAINABLE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES FOR A CIRCULAR ECONOMY THROUGH MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Anna Diaz Tena ,
Josef-Peter Schoeggl ,
Tatiana Reyes  and
Rupert J. Baumgartner
Anna Diaz Tena*
Affiliation:
University of Graz, Institute of Systems Sciences, Innovation and Sustainability Research, Graz, Austria;
Josef-Peter Schoeggl
Affiliation:
University of Graz, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Sustainable Product Management, Graz, Austria; KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Centr
Tatiana Reyes
Affiliation:
Rupert J. Baumgartner
Affiliation:
University of Graz, Institute of Systems Sciences, Innovation and Sustainability Research, Graz, Austria; University of Graz, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Sustainable Product Management, Graz, Austria;
*
Diaz Tena, Anna, University of Graz, Institute of System Sciences, Innovation and Sustainability Research, Austria, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Over the last years, academic literature has made significant progress on the development of key concepts, identifying circular product typologies, developing assessment methods, and exploring the synergies with manufacturing trends such as digitalisation or environmental management. Nevertheless, less attention has been paid on describing process model changes necessary for the implementation of circular product development. For this reason, this paper presents the circular Sustainable Product Development (cSPD) morphological field, aimed at providing implementation guidance to business and industry. It describes possible reconfigurations of the Sustainable Product Development (SPD) process model to further integrate circularity R-strategies, design scopes, design guidelines, inter- and intra-organisational actors and criteria for evaluation. With this framework, we intend to identify the most defining parameters in the process model and assign them a discrete number of categorical values so that different combinations explain the generation of prevalent circular product typologies in the manufacturing of durable goods.

Keywords

Circular economyOrganisation of product developmentSustainabilityDecision making
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 1491 - 1500
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Álvarez, A. and Ritchey, T. (2015), “Applications of General Morphological Analysis”, Acta Morphologica Generalis.Google Scholar
Baldassarre, B., Keskin, D., Diehl, J.C., Bocken, N. and Calabretta, G. (2020), “Implementing sustainable design theory in business practice: A call to action”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 273, p. 123113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, R.J. (2010), Nachhaltigkeitsorientierte Unternehmensführung: Modell, Strategien Und Managementinstrumente, Rainer Ham., Mering.Google Scholar
Belaziz, M., Bouras, A. and Brun, J.M. (2000), “Morphological analysis for product design”, CAD Computer Aided Design, available at:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(00)00019-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, Van den, and Bakker, M.R., C.A. (2015), “A product design framework for a circular economy”, PLATE (Product Lifetimes And The Environment) Conference Proceedings.Google Scholar
Bezerra, C. and Owen, C.L. (2000), “Evolutionary Structured Planning”, Artificial Intelligence in Design ’00, available at:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4154-3_15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blessing, L.T.M. and Chakrabarti, A. (2009), DRM, a Design Research Methodology, DRM, a Design Research Methodology, available at:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-587-1.Google Scholar
Bocken, N.M.P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C. and van der Grinten, B. (2016), “Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy”, Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, available at:https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceschin, F. and Gaziulusoy, I. (2016), “Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions”, Design Studies, available at:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economy, Circle. (n.d.). “Circle Lab”, available at: https://circle-lab.com/.Google Scholar
Desai, A., Lindahl, M. and Widgren, M. (2017), “Actors and System Maps: A Methodology for Developing Product/Service Systems”, available at:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0471-1_15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz, A., Schöggl, J.P., Reyes, T. and Baumgartner, R.J. (2021), “Sustainable product development in a circular economy: Implications for products, actors, decision-making support and lifecycle information management”, Sustainable Production and Consumption, available at:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dokter, G., Thuvander, L. and Rahe, U. (2021), “How circular is current design practice? Investigating perspectives across industrial design and architecture in the transition towards a circular economy”, Sustainable Production and Consumption, Elsevier B.V., Vol. 26, pp. 692–708, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (n.d.). “Learning Hub”, available at: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/explore.Google Scholar
European Circular Economy Stakeholder Platform. (n.d.). “Good practices”, available at: https://circulareconomy.europa.eu/platform/en/good-practices.Google Scholar
Fernandes, S. da, C., Pigosso, D.C.A., McAloone, T.C. and Rozenfeld, H. (2020), “Towards product-service system oriented to circular economy: A systematic review of value proposition design approaches”, Journal of Cleaner Production, available at:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
den Hollander, M.C., Bakker, C.A. and Hultink, E.J. (2017), “Product Design in a Circular Economy: Development of a Typology of Key Concepts and Terms”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, available at:https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kannengiesser, U., Williams, C. and Gero, J. (2013), “What do the concept generation techniques of triz, morphological analysis and brainstorming have in common”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED.Google Scholar
Kjaer, L.L., Pigosso, D.C.A., McAloone, T.C. and Birkved, M. (2018), “Guidelines for evaluating the environmental performance of Product/Service-Systems through life cycle assessment”, Journal of Cleaner Production, available at:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kravchenko, M., Pigosso, D.C. and McAloone, T.C. (2019), “Towards the ex-ante sustainability screening of circular economy initiatives in manufacturing companies: Consolidation of leading sustainability-related performance indicators”, Journal of Cleaner Production, available at:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüdeke-Freund, F., Gold, S. and Bocken, N.M.P. (2019), “A Review and Typology of Circular Economy Business Model Patterns”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, available at:https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, D. and Van der Vorst, R. (2003), “Developing sustainable products and services”, Journal of Cleaner Production, available at:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00164-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, M., de los Rios, C. and Charnley, F. (2016), “Guidelines for Circular Design: A Conceptual Framework”, Sustainability, available at https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niero, M. and Kalbar, P.P. (2019), “Coupling material circularity indicators and life cycle based indicators: A proposal to advance the assessment of circular economy strategies at the product level”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, available at:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostertagová, E., Kováč, J., Ostertag, O. and Malega, P. (2012), “Application of morphological analysis in the design of production systems”, Procedia Engineering, available at:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.09.546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pieroni, M.P.P., McAloone, T.C. and Pigosso, D.C.A. (2019), “Configuring new business models for circular economy through product-service systems”, Sustainability (Switzerland), available at:https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reike, D., Vermeulen, W.J. V and Witjes, S. (2018), “Resources, Conservation & Recycling The circular economy: New or Refurbished as CE 3 . 0? — Exploring Controversies in the Conceptualization of the Circular Economy through a Focus on History and Resource Value Retention Options”, Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, Vol. 135 No. November 2017, pp. 246–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchey, (2011), “On the Formal Properties of Morphological Models”, Wicked Problems – Social Messes, available at:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19653-9_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saidani, M., Yannou, B., Leroy, Y. and Cluzel, F. (2017), “How to assess product performance in the circular economy? Proposed requirements for the design of a circularity measurement framework”, Recycling, available at:https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling2010006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, P., Anggraeni, K. and Weber, U. (2019), “The Relevance of Circular Economy Practices to the Sustainable Development Goals”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, available at:https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shahbazi, S. and Jönbrink, A.K. (2020), “Design guidelines to develop circular products: Action research on nordic industry”, Sustainability (Switzerland), available at:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahel, W.R. (2010), The Performance Economy, 2nd Editio., Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Keyßer, L.T. and Steinberger, J.K. (2020), “Scientists’ warning on affluence”, Nature Communications, available at:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willskytt, S. and Brambila-Macias, S.A. (2020), “Design guidelines developed from environmental assessments: A design tool for resource-efficient products”, Sustainability (Switzerland), available at:https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12124953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, F. (1967), “The Morphological Approach to Discovery, Invention, Research and Construction”, New Methods of Thought and Procedure, available at:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-87617-2_14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar