Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T09:25:25.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EXPLORING HEALTH AND DESIGN EVIDENCE PRACTICES IN EHEALTH SYSTEMS’ DEVELOPMENT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Hosana Cristina Morales Ornelas ,
Maaike Kleinsmann  and
Gerd Kortuem
Hosana Cristina Morales Ornelas*
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology
Maaike Kleinsmann
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology
Gerd Kortuem
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology
*
Morales Ornelas, Hosana Cristina, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands, The, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Evidence-based practices play an essential role in the development of eHealth systems. Prior research has investigated the challenge of shared understanding between professionals from the fields of health sciences and design and has highlighted the need for effective alignment of development and research practices in eHealth. However, there is a limited understanding of epistemological differences between these fields and how professionals conceptualise evidence. In this paper, we investigate how healthcare and design professionals think about evidence and how they implement evidence practices in their work. We interviewed eight professionals and used reflexive thematic analysis to identify the challenges and strategies associated with their evidence practices. Our results identify five shared evidence practices between healthcare and design professionals: stakeholder-driven, process-driven, problem-driven, effect-driven, and solution-driven. These five evidence practices indicate opportunities for closer alignment of development and research practices among healthcare and design professionals and offer a basis to create a shared understanding of evidence between both fields.

Keywords

Evidence-based practiceDesign practiceCollaborative designDesign methodologyDesign theory
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 1795 - 1804
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Blandford, A., Gibbs, J., Newhouse, N., Perski, O., Singh, A., and Murray, E. (2018), “Seven lessons for interdisciplinary research on interactive digital health interventions”, Digital Health, Vol. 4, p. 2055207618770325. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207618770325CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonten, T. N., Rauwerdink, A., Wyatt, J. C., Kasteleyn, M. J., Witkamp, L., Riper, H., et al. (2020), “Online guide for electronic health evaluation approaches: Systematic scoping review and concept mapping study”, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 22 No. 8, p. e17774. https://doi.org/10.2196/17774CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2013), Successful qualitative research: Practical guide for beginners, Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Brown, T. (2008), “Design thinking”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 86 No. 6, pp. 84–92.Google ScholarPubMed
Buchanan, R. (1985), “Declaration by Design: Rhetoric, Argument, and Demonstration in Design Practice”, Design Issues, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 4–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, R. (2009), “Thinking about Design: An Historical Perspective”, In: Meijers, A., Gabbay, D.M., Thagard, P., & Woods, J. (Eds.), Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, Elsevier, pp. 409–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-51667-1.50020-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, N. (1982), “Designerly ways of knowing”, Design Studies, Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694x(82)90040-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djulbegovic, B., and Guyatt, G. H. (2017), “Progress in evidence-based medicine: a quarter century on”, The Lancet, Vol. 390 No. 10092, pp. 415–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31592-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Djulbegovic, B., Guyatt, G. H., and Ashcroft, R. E. (2009), “Epistemologic inquiries in evidence-based medicine”, Cancer Control, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 158–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/107327480901600208CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dong, A., Garbuio, M. and Lovallo, D. (2016), “Generative sensing in design evaluation”, Design Studies, Vol. 45, pp. 68–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.01.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorst, K., and Cross, N. (2001), “Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution”, Design Studies, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-694x(01)00009-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorst, K. and Dijkhuis, J. (1995), “Comparing paradigms for describing design activity”, Design Studies, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694x(94)00012-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enam, A., Torres-Bonilla, J., and Eriksson, H. (2018), “Evidence-based evaluation of ehealth interventions: Systematic literature review”, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 20 No. 11, p. e10971. https://doi.org/10.2196/10971CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ISO (2015), Quality management systems — Fundamentals and vocabulary [online] ISO 9000:2015(En). Available at: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9000:ed-4:v1:enGoogle Scholar
Jurkeviciute, M., and Eriksson, H. (2020), “Exploring the use of evidence from the development and evaluation of an electronic health (eHealth) trial: Case study”, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 22 No. 8, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2196/17718CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Komashie, A. and Clarkson, P.J. (2022), “The Role of Systems Approaches in Health and Care”, Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, Vol. 2, pp. 1283–1292. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamé, G. (2018), “Position paper: On design research engaging with healthcare systems”, 15th International Design Conference - DESIGN2018, Dubrovnik, Croatia, The Design Society, pp. 2681–2692. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathews, S. C., McShea, M. J., Hanley, C. L., Ravitz, A., Labrique, A. B., et al. (2019), “Digital health: a path to validation”, Npj Digital Medicine, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0111-3Google ScholarPubMed
Melles, M., Albayrak, A., and Goossens, R. (2021), “Innovating health care: Key characteristics of human-centered design”, International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Vol. 33 No. Supplement 1, pp. 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaa127CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muratovski, G. (2021), Research for designers: A guide to methods and practice, Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Noortman, R., Lovei, P., Funk, M., Deckers, E., Wensveen, S., & Eggen, B. (2022), “Breaking up data-enabled design: expanding and scaling up for the clinical context”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol. 36 No. 1, p. e19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060421000433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagliari, C. (2007), “Design and evaluation in ehealth: Challenges and implications for an interdisciplinary field”, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 9 No. 2, p. e15. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9.2.e15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., et al. (1996), “Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't”, BMJ, Vol. 312 No. 7023, pp. 71–72. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schön, D.A. (1992), “Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation”, Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-7051(92)90020-gCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H.A. (1988), “The Science of Design: Creating the Artificial”, Design Issues, Vol. 4 No. 1/2, pp. 67–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smits, M., Ludden, G. D., Verbeek, P. P., and van Goor, H. (2022), “How Digital Therapeutics Are Urging the Need for a Paradigm Shift: From Evidence-Based Health Care to Evidence-Based Well-being”, Interactive Journal of Medical Research, Vol. 11 No. 2, p. e39323. https://doi.org/10.2196/39323CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unsworth, H., Dillon, B., Collinson, L., Powell, H., Salmon, M., Oladapo, T., Ayiku, L., Shield, G., et al. (2021), “The NICE Evidence Standards Framework for digital health and care technologies”, Digital Health, Vol. 7, p. 205520762110186 https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076211018617CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E. W. C., Nijland, N., Van Limburg, M., Ossebaard, H. C., Kelders, S. M., et al. (2011), “A holistic framework to improve the uptake and impact of ehealth technologies”, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 13 No. 4, p. e1672. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1672CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO (2016), From innovation to implementation: eHealth in the WHO European region, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/326317Google Scholar
Wyatt, J.C. (2016), “Evidence-based health informatics and the scientific development of the field”, In: Ammenwerth, E. and Rigby, M. (Eds.) Evidence-Based Health Informatics, IOS Press, pp. 14–24. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-635-4-14Google ScholarPubMed