Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:47:27.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DEVELOPMENT OF A DESIGN SUPPORT TOOL FOR SYNTHESISING MULTI-STATE MECHANICAL DEVICE CONCEPTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Anubhab Majumder  and
Amaresh Chakrabarti
Anubhab Majumder*
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India
Amaresh Chakrabarti
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India
*
Majumder, Anubhab, Indian Institute of Science, India, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Conceptual design synthesis, which focuses on generating solution alternatives, has a significant impact on the cost and quality of the final product. The development of radically new and significantly better solutions requires the generation and exploration of a large solution space. This work deals with the conceptual design synthesis of multi-state mechanical devices (MSMD). A scheme for representing a MSMD design task is described. Empirical studies have been carried out to develop a common understanding of the MSMD design synthesis process and use this knowledge for developing a prescriptive model. In order to support the effective and efficient use of the proposed prescriptive model, a web-based computational tool is developed.

Keywords

Conceptual designDesign methodologyComputational design methodsDesign support toolMulti-state mechanical devices
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 1455 - 1464
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Chakrabarti, A. and Bligh, T. P. (1996), “An approach to functional synthesis of mechanical design Concepts: Theory, applications, and emerging research issues”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0890060400001645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiou, S. J. and Sridhar, K. (1999), “Automated conceptual design of mechanisms”, Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 467–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0094-114x(98)00037-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricke, G. (1996), “Successful individual approaches in engineering design”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01608350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, S.P. and Rinderle, J.R. (1989), “A synthesis strategy for mechanical devices”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01580203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez, J.M., Alvarez, G., Cardenal, J. and Cuadrado, J., (1997), “A simple and general method for kinematic synthesis of spatial mechanisms”, Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-114X(96)00017-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joskowicz, L. and Sacks, E., (1994), “Configuration Space Computation for Mechanism Design”, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1994, pp. 1080–1087. https://doi.org/10.1109/robot.1994.351215.Google Scholar
Langdon, P. and Chakrabarti, A. (1999), “Browsing a Large Solution Space in Breadth and Depth”, International Conference in Engineering Design (ICED99), Munich, August 24-26, 1999, pp. 24–26.Google Scholar
Li, C.L, Chan, K.W. and Tan, S.T. (1999), “A configuration space approach to the automatic design of multiple-state mechanical devices”, Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 31 No. 10, pp. 621–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(99)00058-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y.C., Chakrabarti, A. and Bligh, T. (2003), “Towards an 'ideal' approach for concept generation”, Design Studies, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-694x(03)00003-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, C., Hildre, H. P., Zhang, H., and Rølvåg, T. (2015), “Conceptual design of multi-modal products”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-015-0193-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Y.S., Narsale, S.S., Mani, P.K. and Shah, J.J. (2015), “Multi-Modal Knowledge Bases to Facilitate Conceptual Mechanical Design”, International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, August 2-5, 2015, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1115%2Fdetc2015-46372Google Scholar
Starling, A.C. and Shea, K. (2003), “A Grammatical Approach to Computational Generation of Mechanical Clock Designs”, International Conference on Engineering Design ICED03, Stockholm, August 19-21, 2003, pp. 445–446.Google Scholar
Subramanian, D. and Wang, C.S.E. (1995), “Kinematic synthesis with configuration spaces”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 193–213. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fbf01638099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todeti, S.R. (2015), Understanding and Supporting Conceptual Design Synthesis of Multiple State Mechanical Devices, Indian Institute of Science.Google Scholar
Yan, H.S. and Kuo, C.H., (2006), “Representations and identifications of structural and motion state characteristics of mechanisms with variable topologies”, Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1139/tcsme-2006-0003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W. X., Ding, X.L. and Dai, J.S. (2011), “Morphological synthesis of metamorphic mechanisms based on constraint variation”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, Vol. 225 No. 12, pp. 2997–3010. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0954406211408953.Google Scholar