Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T15:37:55.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Design and Evaluation of an Inclusive Autonomous Vehicle User Interface Developed for Persons with Visual Acuity Loss

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

E. Angeleska*
Affiliation:
Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, North Macedonia
A. Aleksovska
Affiliation:
Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, North Macedonia
N. Avramov
Affiliation:
Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, North Macedonia
S. Sidorenko
Affiliation:
Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, North Macedonia
T. Rizov
Affiliation:
Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, North Macedonia
A. Jankovic
Affiliation:
Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, North Macedonia

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This research focuses on evaluating a user interface (UI) for an autonomous vehicle (AV) with the goal to determine the most suitable layout for persons with visual acuity loss. The testing procedure includes a Wizard of Oz AV for simulating an automated ride. Several participants are included in the study and the visual impairments are simulated by specially designed glasses. The conclusions help to determine the optimal graphic design of the UI that can be independently used by persons with blurred vision. The results can be applied to improve the inclusiveness and ergonomics of vehicle UIs.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Allan, J., Kirkpatrick, A., Lawton Henry, S. (2016), Accessibility Requirements for People with Low Vision. [online] W3C First Public Working Draft. Available at: https://www.w3.org/TR/low-vision-needs/#visual-impairments (accessed 14.11.2021).Google Scholar
Allu, S., Jaiswal, A., Lin, M., Malik, A., Ozay, L., Prashanth, T. (2017), Access to personal transportation for people with disabilities with autonomous Vehicles, IE 490/BME 495: Grand Challenges in Accessibility, Purdue University, Indiana, USA.Google Scholar
Bhise, V.D. (2012), Ergonomics in the Automotive Design Process, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton. 10.1201/b11237Google Scholar
Claypool, H., Bin-Nun, A., Gerlach, J. (2017), Self-driving cars, The impact on people with disabilities, The Ruderman White Paper, Ruderman Family Foundation, SAFE, USA.Google Scholar
Darvishy, A., Hutter, H.P. (2018), “Recommendations for Age-Appropriate Mobile Application Design”, In: Di Bucchianico, G., Kercher, P. (Ed.), Advances in Design for Inclusion, Proceedings of the AHFE 2017 International Conference on Design for Inclusion, July 17–21, 2017, The Westin Bonaventure Hotel, Los Angeles, California, USA, Springer, Vol.587, pp. 241-253. 10.1007/978-3-319-60597-5_20Google Scholar
Detjen, H., Pfleging, B., Schneegass, S. (2020), “A Wizard of Oz Field Study to Understand Non-Driving-Related Activities, Trust, and Acceptance of Automated Vehicles”, Proceedings of the 12th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Virtual event, September 21-22, 2020, USA, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, USA, pp. 1929. 10.1145/3409120.3410662Google Scholar
Ferati, M., Murano, P., Giannoumis, G.A. (2018), “Universal Design of User Interfaces in Self-Driving Cars”, In: Di Bucchianico, G., Kercher, P. (Ed.), Advances in Design for Inclusion, Proceedings of the AHFE 2017 International Conference on Design for Inclusion, July 17–21, 2017, The Westin Bonaventure Hotel, Los Angeles, California, USA, Springer, Vol.587, pp. 220-228. 10.1007/978-3-319-60597-5_20Google Scholar
Fulton, G. (2017), Accessibility Basics: Designing for Visual Impairment. [online] Envato Tuts+. Available at: https://webdesign.tutsplus.com/articles/accessibility-basics-designing-for-visual-impairment--cms-27634 (accessed 14.11.2021).Google Scholar
Goodman-Deane, J., Waller, S., Collins, A.C., Clarkson, P. (2013), “Simulating vision loss: What levels of impairment are actually represented?”, Contemporary Ergonomics and Human Factors 2013.Google Scholar
Graham, T., Goncalves, A. (2017), Stop Designing For Only 85% Of Users: Nailing Accessibility In Design. [online] Smashing Magazine. Available at: https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2017/10/nailing-accessibility-design/ (accessed 14.11.2021).Google Scholar
Hamill, D. (2018), The Blurry-Eye Test. [online] UX Collective. Available at: https://uxdesign.cc/the-blurry-eye-test-1bd12bc6c3f8 (accessed 14.11.2021).Google Scholar
Harper, S., Green, P. (2000), “A travel flow and mobility framework for visually impaired travellers”, In: International conference on computers helping people with special needs, OCG Press, pp. 289-296.Google Scholar
Mok, Ka-Jun, Sirkin, B., Sibi, D. Sr., Miller, D. B., Ju, W. (2015), “Understanding driver-automated vehicle interactions through Wizard of Oz design improvisation”, Proceedings of the Eighth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, Driving Assessment, Utah, USA, June 22 – 25, 2015.Google Scholar
Kristjansson, A., Moldoveanu, A., Johannesson, O.I., Balan, O., Spagnol, S., Valgeirsdottir, V.V., Unnthorsson, R. (2016), “Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential”, Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, Vol. 34 No. 5, pp. 769787. 10.3233/RNN-160647Google Scholar
Lewandowski, S. (2018), Inclusion and personalization for autonomous mobility, [Master Thesis], MFA Interaction Design, College for Creative Studies, Detroit, USA.Google Scholar
Macey, S., Wardle, G. (2008), H-Point, The Fundaments of Car Design and Packaging, Design Studio Press, Culver City, CA.Google Scholar
Mandal, A. (2019), Types of visual impairment. [online] News Medical Life Sciences. Available at: https://www.news-medical.net/health/Types-of-visual-impairment.aspx (accessed 14.11.2021).Google Scholar
Nadeem, A. (2014), People Centered HMI's for Deaf and Functionally Illiterate Users, [PhD Thesis], Politecnico Di Torino and University of Potsdam, Italy.Google Scholar
Naujoks, F., Hergeth, S., Wiedemann, K., Schömig, N., Forster, Y., Keinath, A. (2019), “Test Procedure for Evaluating the Human–Machine Interface of Vehicles with Automated Driving Systems”, Traffic Injury Prevention, 20:sup1, S146S151. 10.1080/15389588.2019.1603374Google ScholarPubMed
Shaheen, S., Niemeier, D. (2001), “Integrating vehicle design and human factors: minimizingelderly driving constraints”, Transportation Research Part C, Vol.9 pp. 155174. 10.1016/S0968-090X(99)00027-3Google Scholar
Tilley, A. L., Associates, Dreyfuss H. (1993), The measure of man and woman, Human factors in design, The Whitney Library of Design, an imprint of Watson-Guptill Publications, New York.Google Scholar
Union of concerned scientists (2017), Maximizing the Benefits of Self-Driving Vehicles. [online] UCSUSA Policy brief. Available at: https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/maximizing-benefits-self-driving-vehicles (accessed 14.11.2021).Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2021), Blindness and vision impairment. [online] WHO Fact sheet. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/blindness-and-visual-impairment (accessed 14.11.2021)Google Scholar