Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:00:59.359Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DEEPER COMPREHENSION OF BASIC ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES THROUGH SERIOUS GAME

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Michal Kozderka  and
Bertrand Rose
Michal Kozderka*
Affiliation:
Université de Strasbourg
Bertrand Rose
Affiliation:
Université de Strasbourg
*
Kozderka, Michal, Université de Strasbourg, Icube, France, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

During the last three decades we observe growing use of ecodesign, but we observe also misuse of ecodesign methods, leading often to time and financial loss. In coherence with several failure analysis and with our observation, we base our work on a hypothesis: Misuse of ecodesign is often caused by lack of basic comprehension of environmental issues: Non linearity of the processes, their inertia and their excessive costs.

Building on this hypothesis, we decided to enhance our education program with an innovative serious game. The goal is to achieve comprehension of the basic environmental issues. Innovation of the game lies in revealing to students at the end of the game, that the fictive initial situation of the game corresponded to a starting point of a real catastrophe. Students can thus not only compare their decisions with those of real leaders, but also to understand how and why bad decisions were taken.

Experiments indicate that students who played the game tend to evaluate environmental problems, while those who followed a lecture tend to describe them. This trend (going further than to a description) seems to be useful in decision making and in deployment of ecodesign methods.

Keywords

EcodesignDesign educationSustainabilitySerious game
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 881 - 890
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Marti, B. - Richet, A. - Dufeu, B. (2019) Enseignements Technologiques Transversaux Première et Terminale STI2D. Bertrand-L. Paris. Available at: https://www.decitre.fr/livres/enseignements-technologiques-transversaux-1re-et-tle-sti2d-9782735224371.html.Google Scholar
Baumann, H. and Tillman, A.-M. (2004) The Hitch Hiker's Guide to LCA. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Bundgaard, A. M., Mosgaard, M. A. and Remmen, A. (2017) ‘From energy efficiency towards resource efficiency within the Ecodesign Directive’, Journal of Cleaner Production. Elsevier Ltd, 144, pp. 358–374. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czech Development Agency, (2013), Remediation of Environmental Burdens Caused by Pesticides in Moldova Available at: http://www.czechaid.cz/en/projekty/remediation-of-environmental-burdens-caused-by-pesticides-in-moldova/ (Accessed: 10 December 2020).Google Scholar
von der Heiden, B. et al. (2013) ‘Learning by Playing: Potential of Serious Games to Increase Intellectual Capital’, in Automation, Communication and Cybernetics in Science and Engineering 2011/2012. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 235–247. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33389-7_18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinchliffe, D. and Akkerman, F. (2017) ‘Assessing the review process of EU Ecodesign regulations’, Journal of Cleaner Production. Elsevier Ltd, 168, pp. 1603–1613. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibáñez-Forés, V. et al. (2016) ‘Environmental Product Declarations: exploring their evolution and the factors affecting their demand in Europe’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 116, pp. 157–169. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luttropp, C. and Lagerstedt, J. (2006) ‘EcoDesign and The Ten Golden Rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development’, Journal of Cleaner Production. Elsevier, 14(15-16), pp. 1396–1408. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piekarski, C. M. et al. (2019) ‘LCA and ecodesign teaching via university-industry cooperation’, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., 20(6), pp. 1061–1079. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-11-2018-0206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plouffe, S. et al. (2011) ‘Economic benefits tied to ecodesign’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(6), pp. 573–579. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.12.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polverini, D. and Miretti, U. (2019) ‘An approach for the techno-economic assessment of circular economy requirements under the Ecodesign Directive’, Resources, Conservation and Recycling. Elsevier B.V., 150, p. 104425. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104425.Google Scholar
Prendeville, S. M. et al. (2017) ‘Uncovering ecodesign dilemmas: A path to business model innovation’, Journal of Cleaner Production. Elsevier Ltd, 143, pp. 1327–1339. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, P. C. et al. (2016) ‘The ecological economics of land degradation: Impacts on ecosystem service values’, Ecological Economics. Elsevier B.V., 129, pp. 182–192. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tianhong, L., Wenkai, L. and Zhenghan, Q. (2010) ‘Variations in ecosystem service value in response to land use changes in Shenzhen’, Ecological Economics. Elsevier, 69(7), pp. 1427–1435. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.05.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toniolo, S. et al. (2019) ‘Mapping diffusion of Environmental Product Declarations released by European program operators’, Sustainable Production and Consumption. Elsevier B.V., 17, pp. 85–94. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.09.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhulst, E. and Van Doorsselaer, K. (2015) ‘Development of a hands-on toolkit to support integration of ecodesign in engineering programmes’, Journal of Cleaner Production. Elsevier Ltd, 108, pp. 772–783. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, D., Frangopol, D., Han, X. (2021) Error analysis for approximate structural life-cycle reliability and risk using machine learning methods, Structural Safety. Elsevier B.V., 89, pp. 102033. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.102033Google Scholar
Zavialov, P. (Shirshov, I. of O. M. (2005) Physical Oceanography of the Dying Aral lake. SPRINGER-, Physical Oceanography of the Dying Aral lake. SPRINGER-. Edited by Philippe Blondel, U. r, Geol, C.., , F.G.S., Ph.D., M.Sc., Senior Scientist, Department of Physics, University of Bath, Bath. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/b138791.Google Scholar