Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:56:18.797Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Considerations in the testing of a minimum viable product in healthcare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Komal Shah  and
Manish Arora
Komal Shah*
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India
Manish Arora
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India
*
[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Introducing a Minimum Viable Product in the market and rapidly testing it proves valuable in assessing its value and potential. This involves experiments, gauging growth, and striving to diminish uncertainty in iterative cycles. The application of these approaches in healthcare, however, faces obstacles due to unique challenges including patient safety concerns and regulatory compliances. This paper undertakes a narrative literature review covering experiences of healthcare professionals and presents guiding considerations for medical startups to use in the market validation of their products.

Keywords

lean product developmentbiomedical designco-designuser-centred design
Type
Design for Healthcare
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 1677 - 1686
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Alonso, S., Kalinowski, M., Ferreira, B., Barbosa, S.D. and Lopes, H., 2023. A systematic mapping study and practitioner insights on the use of software engineering practices to develop MVPs. Information and Software Technology, 156, p.107144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E., Lim, S.Y. and Joglekar, N., 2017. Are more frequent releases always better? Dynamics of pivoting, scaling, and the minimum viable product. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2017.705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arandia, N., Garate, J.I. and Mabe, J., 2023. Medical Devices with Embedded Sensor Systems: Design and Development Methodology for Start-Ups. Sensors, 23(5), p.2578. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23052578CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asmar, L., Rabe, M., Low, C.Y., Yee, J., Kühn, A. and Dumitrescu, R., 2018. Framework for the agile development of innovative Product-Service-Systems for existing physical rehabilitation systems. Procedia Manufacturing, 24, pp.147-152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bank, C., 2014. 15 Ways to Test your Minimum Viable Product. URL: https://thenextweb.com/news/15-ways-test-minimum-viable-productGoogle Scholar
Batova, T., Clark, D. and Card, D., 2016, October. Challenges of lean customer discovery as invention. In 2016 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berezkina, E., 2022. Developing a Roadmap How to Bring a New Product to the Market: a low risk medical device.Google Scholar
Blank, S., 2020. The four steps to the epiphany: successful strategies for products that win. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Blank, S. and Dorf, B., 2020. The startup owner's manual: The step-by-step guide for building a great company. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Burfield, E. and Harrison, J.D., 2018. Regulatory hacking: A playbook for startups. Penguin.Google Scholar
Cook, D.A., Bikkani, A. and Poterucha Carter, M.J., 2023. Evaluating education innovations rapidly with build-measure-learn: Applying lean startup to health professions education. Medical teacher, 45(2), pp. 167-178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dennehy, D., Kasraian, L., O'Raghallaigh, P., Conboy, K., Sammon, D. and Lynch, P., 2019. A Lean Start-up approach for developing minimum viable products in an established company. Journal of Decision Systems, 28(3), pp. 224-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2019.1642081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenmann, T.R., Ries, E. and Dillard, S., 2012. Hypothesis-driven entrepreneurship: The lean startup. Harvard business school entrepreneurial management case, (812-095).Google Scholar
Garzaniti, N. and Golkar, A., 2020, October. Performance Assessment of Agile Hardware Co-development Process. In 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.Google Scholar
Nguyen-Duc, A., Khalid, K., Shahid Bajwa, S. and Lønnestad, T., 2019. Minimum viable products for internet of things applications: common pitfalls and practices. Future Internet, 11(2), p.50. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi11020050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reidl, C. and Valtiner, D., 2021. Using MVP in Hardware Industry–Reduce “Time to Market” by Taking Risks. Journal of Advanced Management Science Vol, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.18178/joams.9.4.83-87Google Scholar
Ries, E., 2011. The lean startup: How today's entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. Currency.Google Scholar
Saadatmand, M., 2017. Assessment of minimum viable product techniques: A literature. Assessment.Google Scholar