Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:33:00.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Collaborative Iron Triangle: A New Tool for Supporting a Project-Culture-Aware Management in Interorganizational R&D Projects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

K. Dieterich ,
D. Spath  and
P. Ohlhausen
K. Dieterich*
Affiliation:
University of Stuttgart, Germany
D. Spath
Affiliation:
University of Stuttgart, Germany Fraunhofer IAO, Germany
P. Ohlhausen
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer IAO, Germany Reutlingen University, Germany
*
[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Since project managers still face problems in managing interorganizational R&D projects, it is a promising approach to manage these projects project-culturally-aware. However, an important prerequisite for a project-culture-aware management is that the involved individual organizations pursue a collaborative strategy. Therefore, our article provides a conceptual approach including a new tool, the Collaborative Iron Triangle, which supports both project sponsors and managers in different phases of the collaboration process to pursue a collaborative strategy in interorganizational R&D projects.

Keywords

open innovationproject managementcollaborative designmanagement toolcollaborative iron triangle
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 2: DESIGN2022 , May 2022 , pp. 141 - 150
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Bagherzadeh, Mehdi Gurca, Andrei Brunswicker, Sabine (2019). Problem Types and Open Innovation Governance Modes: A Project-Level Empirical Exploration. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1–15. 10.1109/TEM.2019.2942132.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. A. Pashby, I. R. Gibbons, A. M. (2000). Collaborative R&D projects: A best practice management model. In: Management in the 21st century. Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, ICMIT 2000, 12 - 15 November 2000, Orchard Hotel, Singapore. Piscataway, NJ, IEEE Service Center, 217–223.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. A.Pashby, I. R. Gibbons, A. M. (2006). Managing collaborative R&D projects development of a practical management tool. International Journal of Project Management 24 (5), 395–404. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.03.003.Google Scholar
Calamel, Ludivine Defélix, Christian Picq, Thierry Retour, Didier (2012). Inter-organisational projects in French innovation clusters: The construction of collaboration. International Journal of Project Management 30 (1), 48–59. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesbrough, Henry William (2006). Open innovation. The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, Mass., Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Culpan, Refik (2002). Global business alliances. Theory and practice. Westport, Conn., Quorum Books.Google Scholar
Dechange, André (2020). Projektmanagement – Schnell erfasst. Berlin/Heidelberg, Springer Gabler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dew, Nicholas Read, Stuart Sarasvathy, Saras D. Wiltbank, Robert (2009). Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: Differences between experts and novices. Journal of Business Venturing 24 (4), 287–309. 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.02.002.Google Scholar
Dieterich, Katharina Kaschub, Verena Lisa Ohlhausen, Peter (2021). Ein projektkulturbewusstes Management-Modell für interorganisationale F&E-Projekte. In: Hansgeorg Binz/Bernd Bertsche/Dieter Spath et al. (Eds.). Stuttgarter Symposium für Produktentwicklung SSP 2021. Konferenz zum 6. Stuttgarter Symposium 2021, 1–12.Google Scholar
Dieterich, Katharina Ohlhausen, Peter (2022). A closed-loop control for a cooperative innovation culture in interorganizational R&D projects. Procedia Computer Science 196, 886–893. 10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faschingbauer, Michael (2017). Effectuation. Wie erfolgreiche Unternehmer denken, entscheiden und handeln. 3rd ed. Stuttgart, Schäffer-Poeschel Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fathi, Karim (2019). Kommunikative Komplexitätsbewältigung. Integrierter Methodenpluralismus zur Optimierung disziplinübergreifender Kommunikation. Wiesbaden/Heidelberg, Springer VS.Google Scholar
Fraunhofer Group for Innovation Research (Ed.) (2018). Understanding Change - Shaping the Future. Impulses for the Future of Innovation. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Gassmann, Oliver Enkel, Ellen (2004). Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes. R&D Management Conference (RADMA).Google Scholar
Gerybadze, Alexander (2005). Management von Technologieallianzen und Kooperationen. In: Sönke Albers/Oliver Gassmann (Eds.). Handbuch Technologie- und Innovationsmanagement. Strategie - Umsetzung - Controlling. Wiesbaden/s.l., Gabler Verlag, 155–174.Google Scholar
Grichnik, Dietmar Baierl, Ronny Faschingbauer, Michael (2018). Effectuation. In: Faltin, Günter (Ed.). Handbuch Entrepreneurship. Wiesbaden, Springer Gabler, 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalkowski, Peter Mickler, Otfried (2015). Kooperative Produktentwicklung. Fallstudien aus der Automobilindustrie, dem Maschinenbau und der IT-Industrie. Baden-Baden, Nomos.Google Scholar
Kerzner, Harold (2017). Project management. A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. Hoboken, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
König, Bettina Diehl, Katharina Tscherning, Karen Helming, Katharina (2013). A framework for structuring interdisciplinary research management. Research Policy 42 (1), 261–272. 10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korge, Gabriele Schnabel, Ulrich (2009). Unterstützung moderner Organisationsformen durch multimediale Wissensmanagementsoftware. In: Hans-Jörg Bullinger/Dieter Spath/Hans-Jürgen Warnecke et al. (Eds.). Handbuch Unternehmensorganisation. Strategien, Planung, Umsetzung. 3rd ed. Berlin/Heidelberg, Springer, 723–746.Google Scholar
Kuster, Jürg Bachmann, Christian Huber, Eugen Hubmann, Mike Lippmann, Robert Schneider, Emil Schneider, Patrick Witschi, Urs Wüst, Roger (2019). Handbuch Projektmanagement. Agil - klassisch - hybrid. 4th ed. Berlin, Springer Gabler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lechler, Thomas (1997). Erfolgsfaktoren des Projektmanagements. Zugl.: Karlsruhe, Univ., Diss., 1996. Frankfurt am Main, Lang.Google Scholar
Lewicki, Roy J./ Hiam, Alexander (2006). Mastering business negotiation. A working guide to making deals and resolving conflict. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass a John Wiley & Sons Imprint.Google Scholar
Leyh, Jens Ohlhausen, Peter Spath, Dieter Warschat, Joachim (2014). Projektmanagement. In: Wulff Plinke/Mario Rese/Hartmut Buck et al. (Eds.). Das Ingenieurwissen: ökonomisch-rechtliche Grundlagen. 34th ed. Berlin/Heidelberg, Springer, 53–65.Google Scholar
Ohlhausen, Peter (2002). Methode zur Gestaltung wissensintensiver Kooperationen am Beispiel der Produktentwicklung. Dissertation. Stuttgart, Universität Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Pollack, Julien Helm, Jane Adler, Daniel (2018). What is the Iron Triangle, and how has it changed? International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 11 (2), 527–547. 10.1108/IJMPB-09-2017-0107.Google Scholar
Project Management Institute (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge. (PMBOK® guide). Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, Project Management Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Sarasvathy, Saras D. (2008). Effectuation. Elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Cheltenham, Elgar.Google Scholar
Sydow, Jörg Braun, Timo (2018). Projects as temporary organizations: An agenda for further theorizing the interorganizational dimension. International Journal of Project Management 36 (1), 4–11. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.012.Google Scholar
Thoma, Jules (2018). Zur Kultur von Netzwerken - Wie die neue Form der Wertschöpfung in Netzwerken gelingen kann. In: Tobias Redlich/Manuel Moritz/Jens Peter Wulfsberg (Eds.). Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven zur Zukunft der Wertschöpfung. Wiesbaden, Springer Gabler, 33–50.Google Scholar
vom Brocke, Jan Lippe, Sonia (2015). Managing collaborative research projects: A synthesis of project management literature and directives for future research. International Journal of Project Management 33 (5), 1022–1039. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.02.001.Google Scholar