Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T18:54:27.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Challenges of the integrative product and production system development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Jan-Philipp Disselkamp ,
Ben Schütte  and
Roman Dumitrescu
Jan-Philipp Disselkamp*
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer IEM, Germany
Ben Schütte
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer IEM, Germany
Roman Dumitrescu
Affiliation:
Paderborn University, Germany
*
[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Shorter product lifecycles and a shift from mechatronic to cyber-physical systems are leading to greater product complexity. This complexity can be addressed by more intensive cooperation between product and production system development. Despite intensive development in recent years, these process models have not been able to establish themselves in corporate practice. Therefore, this paper analyses the existing integrative product and production methods to identify the reasons for their lack of use in practice. The analysis has shown that there are nine barriers.

Keywords

integrative developmentproduction designproduct development
Type
Design Methods and Tools
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 553 - 562
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Abele, E. and Reinhart, G. (2011), Zukunft der Produktion: Herausforderungen, Forschungsfelder, Chancen, Carl Hanser Verlag, München. https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446428058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albers, A., Lanza, G., Klippert, M., Schäfer, L., Frey, A., Hellweg, F., Müller-Welt, P., Schöck, M., Krahe, C., Nowoseltschenko, K. and Rapp, S. (2022), “Product-Production-CoDesign: An Approach on Integrated Product and Production Engineering Across Generations and Life Cycles”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 109, pp. 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.05.231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albers, A., Stürmlinger, T., Mandel, C., Wang, J., Frutos, M.B. de and Behrendt, M. (2019), “Identification of potentials in the context of Design for Industry 4.0 and modelling of interdependencies between product and production processes”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 84, pp. 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albrecht, K. and Anderl, R. (2016), “Information Model for the Integration of Manufacturing Restrictions into the Algorithm Based Product Development Process”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 50, pp. 819–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beibl, J., Lee, J., Krause, D. and Moon, S.K. (2023), “Flexibility - Grand Challenge for Product Design and Production: Review and Status”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 119, pp. 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, B. and Gericke, K. (2016), “Entwicklungsprozesse”, in Lindemann, U. (Ed.), Handbuch Produktentwicklung, Hanser eLibrary, Carl Hanser Verlag, München, pp. 399–424. https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446445819.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, B. and Gericke, K. (Eds.) (2021), Pahl/Beitz Konstruktionslehre: Methoden und Anwendung erfolgreicher Produktentwicklung, 9. Aufl. 2021, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57303-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blessing, L.T.M. and Chakrabarti, A. (2009), DRM, a design research methodology, Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-587-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boothroyd, G., Dewhurst, P. and Knight, W.A. (2010), Product design for manufacture and assembly, Manufacturing Engineering and Materials Processing, Vol. 74, 3. Auflage, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420089288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandis, R. (2014), “Systematik für die integrative Konzipierung der Montage auf Basis der Prinziplösung mechatronischer Systeme”, Dissertation, Universität, Paderborn, 2014.Google Scholar
Bullinger, H.-J., Kugel, R., Ohlhausen, P. and Stanke, A. (1995), Integrierte Produktentwicklung: Zehn erfolgreiche Praxisbeispiele, Springer eBook Collection Business and Economics, Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-82712-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, D.S., Arinez, J.F., Duda, J.W. and Linck, J. (2001), “A decomposition approach for manufacturing system design”, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 20 No. 6, pp. 371–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6125(01)80058-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Disselkamp, J.-P., Cieply, J., Dyck, F., Grothe, R., Anacker, H. and Dumitrescu, R. (2023), “Integrated product and production development - a systematic literature review”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 119, pp. 716–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.06.198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumitrescu, R., Albers, A., Riedel, O., Stark, R. and Gausemeier, J. (2021), Engineering in Deutschland - Status quo in Wirtschaft und Wissenschaft: Ein Beitrag zum Advanced Systems Engineering, Paderborn, available at: https://www.advanced-systems-engineering.de/documents/20210414_ASE_Engineering_in_Deutschland.pdf (accessed 29 June 2023).Google Scholar
Ehrlenspiel, K. and Meerkamm, H. (2017), Integrierte Produktentwicklung, Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, München. https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446449084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eigner, M., Koch, W. and Muggeo, C. (2017), Modellbasierter Entwicklungsprozess cybertronischer Systeme: Der PLM-unterstützte Referenzentwicklungsprozess für Produkte und Produktionssysteme, Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eigner, M. and Stelzer, R.H. (2009), Product-lifecycle-Management: Ein Leitfaden für Product Development und Life-cycle-Management, VDI, 2. Aufl., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68401-5.Google Scholar
Eversheim, W., Schuh, G. and Assmus, D. (2005), “Integrierte Produkt- und Prozessgestaltung”, in Eversheim, W. and Schuh, G. (Eds.), Integrierte Produkt- und Prozessgestaltung, VDI, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26946-0_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francalanza, E., Borg, J., Vella, P., Farrugia, P. and Constantinescu, C. (2018), “An ‘Industry 4.0’ digital model fostering integrated product development”, in 2018 IEEE 9th International Conference on Mechanical and Intelligent Manufacturing Technologies (ICMIMT 2018), 2/10/2018 - 2/13/2018, Cape Town, South Africa, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 95–99. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMIMT.2018.8340428.Google Scholar
Gausemeier, J., Dumitrescu, R., Echterfeld, J., Pfänder, T., Steffen, D. and Thielemann, F. (2019), Innovationen für die Märkte von morgen: Strategische Planung von Produkten, Dienstleistungen und Geschäftsmodellen, Hanser, München.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gausemeier, J., Dumitrescu, R., Kahl, S. and Nordsiek, D. (2011), “Integrative development of product and production system for mechatronic products”, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 772–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2011.02.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gausemeier, J., Lanza, G. and Lindemann, U. (2012), Produkte und Produktionssysteme integrativ konzipieren, Carl Hanser Verlag, München. https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446429857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gausemeier, J. and Plass, C. (2014), Zukunftsorientierte Unternehmensgestaltung, Carl Hanser Verlag, München. https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446438422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gericke, K., Bender, B., Feldhusen, J. and Grote, K.-H. (2021a), “Entwickeln von Wirkstrukturen”, in Bender, B. and Gericke, K. (Eds.), Pahl/Beitz Konstruktionslehre: Methoden und Anwendung erfolgreicher Produktentwicklung, 9. Aufl. 2021, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 255–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57303-7_10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gericke, K., Bender, B., Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J. and Grote, K.-H. (2021b), “Der Produktentwicklungsprozess”, in Bender, B. and Gericke, K. (Eds.), Pahl/Beitz Konstruktionslehre: Methoden und Anwendung erfolgreicher Produktentwicklung, 9. Aufl. 2021, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 57–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57303-7_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gericke, K., Bender, B., Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J. and Grote, K.-H. (2021c), “Grundlagen methodischen Vorgehens in der Produktentwicklung”, in Bender, B. and Gericke, K. (Eds.), Pahl/Beitz Konstruktionslehre: Methoden und Anwendung erfolgreicher Produktentwicklung, 9. Aufl. 2021, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 27–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57303-7_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graner, M. (2015), Methodeneinsatz in der Produktentwicklung: Bessere Produkte, schnellere Entwicklung, höhere Gewinnmargen, Essentials, Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08582-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gräßler, I., Pöhler, A. and Hentze, J. (2017), “Decoupling of Product and Production Development in Flexible Production Environments”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 60, pp. 548–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.01.040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gräßler, I., Wiechel, D., Roesmann, D. and Thiele, H. (2021), “V-model based development of cyber-physical systems and cyber-physical production systems”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 100, pp. 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gräßler, I. and Yang, X. (2016), “Interdisciplinary Development of Production Systems Using Systems Engineering”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 50, pp. 653–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.05.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinen, T., Rimpau, C. and Wörn, A. (2008), “Wandlungsfähigkeit als Ziel der Produktionssystemgestaltung”, in Nyhuis, P., Reinhart, G. and Abele, E. (Eds.), Wandlungsfähige Produktionssysteme: Heute die Industrie von morgen gestalten, PZH Produktionstechnisches Zentrum, Garbsen, pp. 19–32.Google Scholar
Helbing, K., Mund, H. and Reichel, M. (2018), Handbuch Fabrikprojektierung, SpringerLink Bücher, 2. Auflage, Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55551-4.Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization (2015), Systems and software engineering: System life cycle processes No. 15288.Google Scholar
Jacob, A., Windhuber, K., Ranke, D. and Lanza, G. (2018), “Planning, Evaluation and Optimization of Product Design and Manufacturing Technology Chains for New Product and Production Technologies on the Example of Additive Manufacturing”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 70, pp. 108–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.02.049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jürgenhake, C. (2017), “Systematik für eine prototypenbasierte Entwicklung mechatronischer Systeme in der Technologie MID (Molded Interconnect Devices)”, Dissertation, Universität Paderborn, Paderborn, 2017. https://doi.org/10.17619/UNIPB/1-225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kampker, A., Schuh, G., Burggräf, P., Nowacki, C. and Swist, M. (2012), “Cost innovations by integrative product and production development”, CIRP Annals, Vol. 61 No. 1, pp. 431–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, F. (1985), “Integrerad Produktutveckling. Arbetsmodell”, Series 21 Produktutveckling.Google Scholar
Petersen, M., Bandak, S., Gausemeier, J., Iwanek, P. and Schneider, M. (2014), “Methodik zur Berücksichtigung von Wechselwirkungen zwischen Produkt und Produktionssytem in den frühen Phasen der Produktentwicklung - ein Praxisbeispiel”, in Schenk, M. (Ed.), Digitales Engineering zum Planen, Testen und Betreiben technischer Systeme, 24. - 26. Juni 2014, Magdeburg, Fraunhofer IFF, pp. 13–21.Google Scholar
Schäfer, L., Günther, M., Martin, A., Lüpfert, M., Mandel, C., Rapp, S., Lanza, G., Anacker, H., Albers, A. and Köchling, D. (2023), “Systematics for an Integrative Modelling of Product and Production System”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 118, pp. 104–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.06.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinnwell, C. (2020), “Methode zur Produktionssystemkonzipierung auf Basis früher Produktinformationen”, Dissertation, Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, 02/2020.Google Scholar
Steimer, C. and Aurich, J.C. (2016), “Analysis of Information Interdependencies Between Product Development and Manufacturing System Planning in Early Design Phases”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 50, pp. 460–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoffels, P., Kaspar, J., Baehre, D. and Vielhaber, M. (2017), “Holistic Material Selection Approach for More Sustainable Products”, Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 8, pp. 401–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoffels, P., Kaspar, J. and Vielhaber, M. (2021), “Product vs. Production Development II - Integrated Product, Production, Material and Joint Definition”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 1, pp. 2471–2480. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoffels, P. and Vielhaber, M. (2015), “Methodical Support for Concurrent Engineering across Product and Production (System) Development”, in Weber, C., Husung, S., Cantamessa, M., Cascini, G., Marjanovic, D. and Graziosi, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED15) Vol 4: Design for X, Design to X, Milan, Italy, 27-30.07.15, Design Society, Glasgow, pp. 155–162.Google Scholar
Stoffels, P. and Vielhaber, M. (2016), “Integrated development process of products and production systems”, in Boks, C., Sigurjonsson, J., Steinert, M., Vis, C. and Wulvik, A. (Eds.), NordDesign 2016: Trondheim, August 10-12, The Design Society, Bristol, United Kingdom, pp. 370–380.Google Scholar
Stoffels, P.D. (2017), “Integrierte Definition von Produkt, Produktion und Material zur Steigerung der Ressourceneffizienz”, Dissertation, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, 2017. https://doi.org/10.22028/D291-26985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M.K., Juel Jespersen, I.K. and Kjærgaard, T. (2018), “Design for manufacturing and assembly key performance indicators to support high-speed product development”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 70, pp. 114–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.02.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verein Deutscher Ingenieure e.V. (2004), VDI-Richtlinie 2206:2004 - Entwicklungsmethodik für mechatronische Systeme No. VDI2206b.Google Scholar
Verein Deutscher Ingenieure e.V. (2011), VDI-Richtlinie 5200 Blatt 1: Fabrikplanung - Planungsvorgehen No. VDI5200-1.Google Scholar
Verein Deutscher Ingenieure e.V. (2019), VDI-Richtlinie 2221 Blatt 1: Entwicklung technischer Produkte und Systeme - Modell der Produktentwicklung No. VDI2221-1.Google Scholar
Verein Deutscher Ingenieure e.V. (2021), VDI-Richtlinie 2206:2021: Entwicklung mechatronischer und cyber-physischer Systeme No. VDI2206a.Google Scholar
Vielhaber, M. and Stoffels, P. (2014), “Product Development vs. Production Development”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 21, pp. 252–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, J. and Watson, R.T. (2002), “Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. xiii–xxiii.Google Scholar